Ok. Lets start with Mc.
It eas very close to deadline. Mc had four votes, eevee had three.
The only ones online were MC,shy,me. Mc asked that we stay online and try to work out some way to save him. I said I thought the case eas too weak on Mc and pulled my vote off him (saving him) however, there eas still s question about eevee and with the three on him (I believe jimm eas one or not voting__need to Doublecheck). You ssaid you thought eevee was town so I didn't put my vote on eevee even though I was still a little Leary of your tunneling me. Mc was saves but we lost eevee. UN my mind you were integral to making that happen. Next, whenwe ewere considering Robz, I wasn't quite on board with his lunch so I asked you for the case on him. Since you knew his play s lit better then me, I trusted your case and joined that train. Shortly after, I asked for help putting together who was off train day one to see if there was correlation with anyone off train on day 2. This seemed lime the logical step: see who was not helpful both days. From what I put together it looked like to me there eas really only one good choice: jimmm (or not trusting you). I didn't plan on jimm finally showing up and tunneling me like mad, mostly by resorting to lying and distorting my request for help into: intentionally quickhammering robz (he still eveuidentky opposes the robz lynch, even after he flipped scum)
That's basically the case in him: off wagon/MIA st critical times,.and making really scummy cases on me. I bekeive both you and seversl others had good cas on him prior to the robz vote. But I need to read back again.