What evidence is there to suggest Robz is MU?
you mean beside the fact that he is the only player to have actively deflected an impending lynch away from scum in mcmc.
I mean... look. Here is the scenario. Mcmc is about to get lynched. He is at L-2. That team has already lost Galz N1 and to lose another player would be devestating. Basically game over I think. Robz knows this and thinks fast. He realizes he can claim tracker. He can say that because Galz was rolecop and since he tracked mcmc and didn't see him target anyone, that mcmc can't have been the person performing the NK, therefore he is less likely to be scum. It doesn't matter whether or not mcmc actually performed the NK or not because Robz can just claim this and in so doing both mcmc and robz become somewhat unlynchable. mcmc because he was less likely to be scum. Robz because he did a townie thing in saving a townie! and it worked great! mcmc was never in danger of being lynched until yesterday. Robz has never been near being lynched either.
It seems that the only reason that goes against this train of thought is because supposedly robz wouldn't have killed ash in the night. But I have already explained this and have already explained the above as well.... Apparently no one reads my posts!!!
Robz knows that because mcmc flipped MU, he will be more highly suspicious because of his involvement with him tracking. As such he needs to get the focus off him... A good way to do that is to get the focus of there being a MU. The best way to do that, kill someone that only a maquis would want to kill... the maquis cop in ash! Not to mention that there is the built in feature of "Robz would never kill ash, ash was too buddy buddy with him and had a town read on him."
But I have said this already. If you really want to know what I think about things, go read my posts.