So, while making dinner and thinking, I realized I didn't include everyone in my previous scattershot analysis. In particular I realized that I hadn't mentioned DSell, then I realized that I had gone until I had 11 people and then for some reason believed I'd hit everyone other than myself. So, I tried to determine which 3 people I hadn't mentioned and I remembered Glooble. But I couldn't figure out who else I left out. Now that I sit to post this though I realize it's Jimmmmm. Okay, so the 3 I left out:
DSell: medium town-read from the station-aligned question. It could be a scum-ploy for town-cred, but it strikes me as too genuine.
Glooble: He seems to be the regular "lurking" Glooble. I noticed he'd posted since my last post, but I was kind of skimming, to see if anyone had figured out who I left out of my list. Null read for the moment.
Jimmmmm: well, I did mention him in my previous post, he just didn't get a bullet-point. Anyways, yeah, I'm leaning town here. Though it could be scum pushing what he thought was a legitimate case (reference previous multi-ball note).
Final comment: @raerae, why are you uncomfortable to be linked with shraeye? I mean you guys post over the same time frame (which is reasonable), and have some level of conversation between yourselves. You've also taken the same (or very similar stances) regarding, for example, the contradiction case, and Ashersky's lack of case. So, at the moment you both kind of blend.