These are the combination of posts that left me with a scum read on Frisk. I've been holding off posting until we got more chatter going on in here. My D2 reasons stand as stated, but these had already stood out to me:
<crickets>
We've used 1/3 of our bankable days. We need to lynch. Someone. I find Eevee scummy, but I'm willing to put that off for another day.
Vote: Lekkit
I'm certainly willing to move my vote elsewhere. I've got no absolute reads, but if nothing else Lekkit's reaction to being called out for lurking is scummy - And the "I've got nothing to say, it's D1" is very unhelpful at best. I get it, D1 sucks. We all push to get through it though and make the best out of nothing. If nobody does anything, nothing happens.
I'm still suffering from mafia catchup overload, but I'm not sure I understand your reasoning here. At the time of your vote - eevee lynch looks more viable, and yet you choose lekkit, and your reasoning is that he says he's bad at day 1 - which ignores eevee being scummy as recently as the last page:
Self meta arguments are meh, but no one else is saying this so... This is NOT AT ALL like scumEevee n RMM3.
The low post count is (as you point out) very out of character for you as town as well.
Not unheard of though. I'm often like this in day 1.
Lynching lurker lekkit lights my lovehandles too, but I'm just not sure I understand why you prefer one to the other. Eevee's low involvement is semi out of character. Lekkit's isn't.
And why is nobody with me on RobZ?
In the above quote he really tries to redirect to any of the other wagons. He even gives me a "if all you cared about was viability" line which I find very fake. Of course that's not the case. In the second post below (same page, fwiw), he's suddenly willing to "consider" putting Lekkit at L-1... But that vote was NEVER forthcoming.
I still prefer RobZ, but in the interest of moving this forward, I would say that a reread of Lekkit's posts does seem plausible as scum-lurking.
Are we comfortable putting him at L-1?
Instead, we get the following quote, "prove to me this will work with evidence from previous games".
Man, I support the Lekkit lynch for LaLL and his reaction to being called out by the IC...
But I also can't get over f.DS leaving "Lynch Mafia, not Scum" somewhere in our history books.
I'm gonna stay on him for now, because I think we need a lynch to go through - and I'll probably be painted as a crazy hedger but whatever - but I really don't know.
Robz IS right when he said earlier that this matches Town!Lekkit Meta.
Equally however, Cayvie is right that Town!Meta Lekkit should not be difficult to mimic as Scum!Lekkit.
Blargh.
Still, LaLL stands, I think. It's something we don't actually follow through with frequently enough, and goodness how often it would hit scum if we did! So I'm happy (as happy as I can be) with my vote here.
Do we have data that suggests that the worst lurker has historically been scum?
Lastly, I switch my vote to Eevee in #556... And Frisk jumps all over it, without a moments pause. 13 posts later he takes my L-2 vote to L-1:
Ok - we did talk about an end of day tuesday thing right?
Vote: Eevee I don't recall seeing him as his normal buddy buddy which drives me bonkers, but he's definitely posting less than normal.
Per Galz - this is L-1.
I was honestly left with the feeling that Frisk was really dragging the Lekkit lynch. Concerned about missing out if it was going to go down, but really, really wanting anybody but. Even when Lekkit was at L-2, he asked if we were ready for him to be L-1, then never put him there - but with Eevee, there was no hesitation and no questioning.
Dunno, but of everybody "off" the eventual Lekkit lynch, Frisk stands our the most hands down.