Heh, unvote you, why for exactly?
You are still my #1. First you push PR lynches, won't consider actually possible things and going with theories where there are 2 scum both lying about their roles and basically digging their grave if one dies, and than when thing settles on that front you go along with even worse "let's just lynch any VT claim, doesn't matter, almost all are scum".
That, coupled with a closed claim that first stirred up more trouble by messing with numbers and now puts you, coincidentally, on the safe side of the "lynch VT" policy you are pushing.
I could be swayed to theo or sparky, but I'd like you the most. Jo I still don't suspect, I get his attacks on you but I think that they are wrong, Ins is a tad scummier cuz of PR L-1ing but I still don't think I'd lynch him. Frisk has done a stupid thing IMO with massclaim thing, but his claim is one that I trust as I don't see double doc/JK claim, especially as he could just claimed VT as scum and got me lynched immediately, so, no to Frisk lynch at all.
O is a mystery to me still, theo and sparky scummiest of VT claims (theo for O tunnel and constant theory), Cuzz I kinda forgot about but I am like 60/40 torn on lying/not lying.
PPE: 11 replies. JEEEEEZ.
@Cuz - sparky has 1.