D3:
Voted raptor, basically stayed there, although again made one argument for Dylan over raptor. They quickly switched course when that looked bad (I think) and came up with fairly solid reasons for raptor first in the 1v1. I'd say those reasons evened out the one scummy post defending raptor.
Then there is a scummy lob right at the end of the day before the flip, calling out WCD. The content isn't scummy so much as the odd way it is tossed out in a non sequitur way. I call it "planting the seed of suspicion" and it is a scum tactic. Town can do it, too, on purpose or not, but it is a legit tactic.
That's my takeaway from D3.
(I will note that my ISO style is read all/only posts by the ISO person first, then re-read all/only posts that mention the ISO person. I'm on the first part, obviously.)
I mean after we got Joseph regardless of who the third skum was the plan had to be to bus the shit out of raptor if the day started the way they thought it would right? You think more vote or more bus with scola sit/vote?
Your abbreviations are confusing.
I think a vast majority of the time, once Joseph went down the plan would be to hard~bus raptor due to the missed hammer looking scummy. There are other options -- soft~bus while seeding doubt by using technically legit arguments like "hey town forgets too" or "man it doesn't make sense for scum to do that." You could just straight up refuse to bus, which would be a reverse-psychology too scummy to be scum move, which is popular in some sets.
If scola is scum, they went soft~bus at first, saw the error of those ways, then switched gears. I'm not sure that's what happened, but there's a narrative there that could fit.
I don't know what "more vote or more bus" means, but I hope that answers your question.