You did not defend EFHW.
I had her as a town read
from day 1 onward, and I pointed out how she feels different from the previous game (where she was scum) and how classical scumtells shouldn't be valued normally wrt her multiple times (for example
here). I never advocated lynching her even before her claim.
But more importantly, you're just lying about the setup thing being obvious. No-one pointed it out except me, and literally no-one ever agreed with it. That includes you. Which is strange as I've pointed out before (one of my reasons to scumread you) because I expected that you would agree with it. But I remember you saying EFHW's claim looked scummy because there was too much town power floating around.
Regardless, a point is objectively nonobvious if no-one else makes it or agrees with it. There's also no reason why it should be obvious since it's based on something that would only even make senses to mods.
Saying that shraey was the reason she wasn't lynched and I wasn't the reason is also pretty silly. If 19 people do a majority vote and one option wins 10-9, then everyone voting for that option would have changed the outcome by voting differently. Being "the reason" is not a well-defined concept. The question is whether there is a chance that EFHW would have been lynched if I had supported that lynch, and I think the answer is a clear yes, since she was very much on the table despite my saying repeatedly that I don't want to lynch her. if I had said the opposite, of course that could have changed something. If shraey had pushed her lynch, that would also have changed something. Probably more since his voice had more weight.