iguana will you do a reread of just twm and if you want me as well and then post your conclusions.
Innocent Child? We don't appear to have one? How worried should we be about mafia with a 2-shot vig?
This has been much talked about as a scummy post. But I don't think scum is this blatant.
Gkrieg gets it. unvote
Get's what everyone else already gets?
vote: mcmcsalot
This is a weird almost naked vote. Later he seems overly defensive for getting a few early votes on him.
mcmc did something townie. I don't remember what it was. Oh wait. I liked that he said we should take notes (maybe if I had taken notes I would have remembered that easier). Sure anyone can suggest it for towncred, I acknowledge that but he gets towncred anyway.
So, vote: sudgy
I'll sheep faust
Scummy self awareness. I write this kind of over-drafted hedging as scum a lot.
Later when he goes back to McMc with no reason given, that is the opposite though. If he's self-aware of how others will perceive his posts, I'd think he would try to produce a reason again. If he's just following his gut, though, he might not.
He switches to Awaclus, he switches to McMc, he switches to J Reggie. His votes are a little over the place, which is townie, but he also seems to be hopping on whatever is the biggest current wagon that isn't him, which could be scummy, although not very sophisticated.
The main reason I haven't voted TWM is because someone (I think Gkrieg) pointed out that he's been basically lynchbait in previous games, and since then I've been reading his play as lynchbait play, not scum. Plus, if he's scum, that should mean he'll be easy to catch later. All the setup talk is super lynch-baity. Like, who thinks that scum is really going to try to trick people into PR-slipping by having a setup discussion?