Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ashersky]

Sudgy and Jimmmmm are in the game

But are not disturbances in the force.  Whatever that is.

[J Reggie]

Wine Merchant, how many games have you played?

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Wine Merchant, how many games have you played?

This will be my fifth. Three are completed M91, M96 and NM10, one is still ongoing.

[pingpongsam]

Sudgy and Jimmmmm are in the game

But are not disturbances in the force.  Whatever that is.

Jimmmm will be felt. Sudgy? When was the last time i saw Ms Komen in a Mafia game?

[iguanaiguana]

Ok I skimmed. I like Vote: Ash for third party hunting.

[iguanaiguana]

Is that a Wagons! ?

[2.71828.....]

And for the love of all we must lynch the survivor, if they claim.  Every game ever stands as proof.

This

[2.71828.....]

Ash, no plan? Or are you waiting for D3

[mcmcsalot]

Ok I skimmed. I like Vote: Ash for third party hunting.

I didn't get that from what ash has done. I think he's just been helpful.

[Dylan32]

Ok I skimmed. I like Vote: Ash for third party hunting.

I didn't get that from what ash has done. I think he's just been helpful.

I agree. There's a difference between hunting and pointing out a potential slip.

[Robz888]

Vote Count 1.3

LaLight (1): SpaceAnemone,
mcmcsalot (2): 2.71828..., The_Wine_Merchant
2.71828 (1): AndrewisFTTW
pingpongsam (1): gkrieg
ashersky (2): LaLight, iguanaiguana
Cuzz (1): Eevee
JaketheBaseballGod22 (1): Dylan32
J Reggie (1): JaketheBaseballGod22
The_Wine_Merchant (3): J Reggie, ashersky, mcmcsalot
RoadRunner (2): O, Cuzz

Not Voting (8.): Galzria, Calamitas, faust, Awaclus, pingpongsam, RoadRunner, Jimmmm, sudgy,

With 23 alive it takes just 10 to lynch. Day 1 ends on Tuesday, May 23, at 10:00 AM Forum Time.

[Dylan32]

Vote: TWM. I'd rather my vote be somewhere potentially useful.

[Roadrunner7671]

Not reading a bunch of fluff might be anti fun, and it could even be anti town. My point is that posting a lot of stuff, regardless of what that stuff is, is scummy because gumming up the thread is an easy tactic to use here, and it's fairly effective.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Vote: TWM. I'd rather my vote be somewhere potentially useful.

Yay another vote without any substantial or even insignificant explanation for a vote.

And I am basically at five because this type of situation is basically votebait for Awaclus.

[Dylan32]

Vote: TWM. I'd rather my vote be somewhere potentially useful.

Yay another vote without any substantial or even insignificant explanation for a vote.

And I am basically at five because this type of situation is basically votebait for Awaclus.

You are also the closest thing I have to a scumread right now, anyway. Should have made that clear.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

To summarize the votes on me:

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Innocent Child? We don't appear to have one? How worried should we be about mafia with a 2-shot vig?

vote: twm

Innocent Child? We don't appear to have one? How worried should we be about mafia with a 2-shot vig?

vote: twm

Sheep vote:twm

Vote: TWM. I'd rather my vote be somewhere potentially useful.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Vote: TWM. I'd rather my vote be somewhere potentially useful.

Yay another vote without any substantial or even insignificant explanation for a vote.

And I am basically at five because this type of situation is basically votebait for Awaclus.

You are also the closest thing I have to a scumread right now, anyway. Should have made that clear.

Good thing for you I have done soooo many scummy things then, right?

[Dylan32]

Post #304

oops disconnected and botched reply.

Reply: In my opinion, massclaim = bad. But the discussion might overall be protown independently, and is definitely not just RVS discussion which is inherently nice.

This O guy might not be town, but he probably is. But he is basically thinking all the things I am! So I like him!

Post #321

Good God people. You don't need to take a stand on whether we are going to mass claim. We aren't. You don't need to chime in on it. What we should talk about is what other roles out there might be worth claiming in isolation now or later and how we can best use them to our advantage. Or maybe we shouldn't talk about that. But we can at least talk about talking about it.

Seriously no one has ever suggested mass claiming (except PPS I guess off-offhandedly) so it shouldn't warrant dozens of posts about it and no one should be getting towncred for being against it.

Somewhere in the space of 17 posts TWM went from agreeing with and townreading someone based on their stand on a massclaim to denouncing the entire conversation.  That kind of flip seems too manufactured to be genuine from town.

[gkrieg13]

This seems like scummy TWM, which means that he is town.  Just like look at his newbie game.  He has a CRAZY different tone when he is scum compared to town.

[Cuzz]

Not reading a bunch of fluff might be anti fun, and it could even be anti town. My point is that posting a lot of stuff, regardless of what that stuff is, is scummy because gumming up the thread is an easy tactic to use here, and it's fairly effective.

This is so empirically anti-town I want us to lynch RR now.

[gkrieg13]

Not reading a bunch of fluff might be anti fun, and it could even be anti town. My point is that posting a lot of stuff, regardless of what that stuff is, is scummy because gumming up the thread is an easy tactic to use here, and it's fairly effective.

This is so empirically anti-town I want us to lynch RR now.

You will hit an anti-town player, but I don't think you'll be hitting scum.

[2.71828.....]

Not reading a bunch of fluff might be anti fun, and it could even be anti town. My point is that posting a lot of stuff, regardless of what that stuff is, is scummy because gumming up the thread is an easy tactic to use here, and it's fairly effective.

I think you can probably get away with not reading everything D1, but you can bet that what you post on D1 will be (or should be) referenced back to on say D6.

Basically, I disagree that a large number of posts=gumming up the thread

[The_Wine_Merchant]

My post wasn't in response to O alone, but to the half dozen to a dozen people who were all saying the same things. And if you actually look at my post, I still agree with O and never denounced him. I think a discussion about roles could be a good thing.

Dylan, your read is the one that looks manufactured to conveniently be part of the largest wagon.

[Dylan32]

Good God people. You don't need to take a stand on whether we are going to mass claim. We aren't. You don't need to chime in on it. What we should talk about is what other roles out there might be worth claiming in isolation now or later and how we can best use them to our advantage. Or maybe we shouldn't talk about that. But we can at least talk about talking about it.

Seriously no one has ever suggested mass claiming (except PPS I guess off-offhandedly) so it shouldn't warrant dozens of posts about it and no one should be getting towncred for being against it.

These roles should claim immediately: investigation immune, JOAT, godfatherer, Ninja, convert SK to werewolf.

You are so, oh so, very helpful. If I were a vig. I would vig you.

In the words of O, this is at least anti-fun.

PPE 4

[gkrieg13]

I agree with e.  I think that there won't be that many people left later on, and ISOing people (just reading the posts of one person) is just as easy to do with 23 people as it is with 9 people.