Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[LaLight]

to make my point more clearly:

vote:LaLight


reasoning:

we have no Innocent child. Investigation Immune and 2-shot Vig are both higher utility for the Scumteam than the town. LaLight is the most likely in my eyes to have the #1 draft slot and claim the #1 role, having read every mafia game. 

I'm fully open to arguments that we shouldn't be lynching a likely vig, that LaLight doesn't understand you all very well, or just general scumminess arguments later on.

So your argument is that if I would be #1 to choose a role I should've chosen IC at all costs? I don't think this argument is legit

I don't think that's exactly O's point

I don't get why i am more likely to bid on #1 box actually

[Dylan32]

What is a poe?

Process of Elimination

[LaLight]

Oh and this game is really unmanageable. Though quickly skipping over the pages I am still cool where my vote is

[Dylan32]

I'm feeling townie on Cuzz

[O]

Absolutely not. I think both town and scum would pick 2-shot vig. I just think both of those roles are more utility to scum than town.

The #1 box is both the strongest, and listed first! Do you deny your human nature? 

[The_Wine_Merchant]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

[J Reggie]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

RVS. Or if they're scum.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

[J Reggie]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

Because you're scum.

[mcmcsalot]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

Doesn't the same logic apply to saying not OMGUSing that wasn't suspicious but you hope people think it is and are using poor logic, scummy all around.

[pingpongsam]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

I don't agree that gkrieg is wholly scummy but it is hard to argue with ash's vote on TWM, no?

[LaLight]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

Because you're scum.

Awaclus changeg nickname and avatar? Oo

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

Because you're scum.

False. And what I think you meant to say was that you (and two others) find me scummy. Quite the difference.

Is J Reggie usually this obstinate and difficult?

[The_Wine_Merchant]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

Doesn't the same logic apply to saying not OMGUSing that wasn't suspicious but you hope people think it is and are using poor logic, scummy all around.

I am not sure what your sentence said. Could you rephrase?

[J Reggie]

Also, I had previously said I would be basing my reads off of something superficial. That's done.

[LaLight]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

Because you're scum.

False. And what I think you meant to say was that you (and two others) find me scummy. Quite the difference.

Is J Reggie usually this obstinate and difficult?

Not really

[The_Wine_Merchant]

And Goddamn, why is scrolling not working?

[The_Wine_Merchant]

Three votes on me. Don't know why.

I don't agree that gkrieg is wholly scummy but it is hard to argue with ash's vote on TWM, no?

Innocent Child? We don't appear to have one? How worried should we be about mafia with a 2-shot vig?

vote: twm

This vote? You are right. I can't argue with it. There is nothing there.

[mcmcsalot]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

Doesn't the same logic apply to saying not OMGUSing that wasn't suspicious but you hope people think it is and are using poor logic, scummy all around.

I am not sure what your sentence said. Could you rephrase?

You said not omgusing but why have to specify a serious vote. I am saying why have to specify you are not omgusing. Also I don't think specifying a vote is serious is suspicious.

[The_Wine_Merchant]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

Doesn't the same logic apply to saying not OMGUSing that wasn't suspicious but you hope people think it is and are using poor logic, scummy all around.

I am not sure what your sentence said. Could you rephrase?

You said not omgusing but why have to specify a serious vote. I am saying why have to specify you are not omgusing. Also I don't think specifying a vote is serious is suspicious.

Gotcha. I mean, I am not voting for J Reggie even though I want to because I only have one vote and want to keep it where it is. So I am not going to OMGUS him.

[pingpongsam]

Still haven't seen Awaclus, Andrew, or faust. That's 3 major disturbances to the force that haven't registered yet.

[O]

vote: The_Wine_Merchant

Serious vote.

Is anybody else no longer able to automatically bold on mobile?

Not OMGUSing. But when people have to specify if it is a serious vote, that is suspicious. Why would anyone think this wasn't a serious vote?

Doesn't the same logic apply to saying not OMGUSing that wasn't suspicious but you hope people think it is and are using poor logic, scummy all around.

I am not sure what your sentence said. Could you rephrase?

You said not omgusing but why have to specify a serious vote. I am saying why have to specify you are not omgusing. Also I don't think specifying a vote is serious is suspicious.

Gotcha. I mean, I am not voting for J Reggie even though I want to because I only have one vote and want to keep it where it is. So I am not going to OMGUS him.

the entirety of this conversation is so circular and useless that I am fully willing to lynch anyone that continues it.

[Cuzz]

Still haven't seen Awaclus, Andrew, or faust. That's 3 major disturbances to the force that haven't registered yet.

Andrew showed up just to vote e.

iguana also has been essentially absent.

[LaLight]

Sudgy and Jimmmmm are in the game

[pingpongsam]

Sudgy and Jimmmmm are in the game

I thought I saw a sudgy but good call on Logan.