Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[SpaceAnemone]

(at least scum dayvigs are... uncommon).

This reminds me that I need to run a game that mirrors the set-up of the Werewolf I used to play IRL. It had dayvigs of both alignments almost every game, precisely because it got boring when vigs could clear themselves just by killing someone.

We also had punishment for looking like you were vigging someone if you didn't have that power: Fate (the mod) was allowed to smite you dead :-)

[schadd]

yeah, schadd, that was bad. dayvig: schadd

vote: Robz, he's scum.

I'm actually not, this time! It's weird and makes me care less. But i will try anyway

i think that i am just going to lynch you if you do more of this. it's really not interesting

It probably does not matter a lot, but claiming "Not dayvig" through silly jokes isn't the best idea ever.

i don't really agree

vote: WW

Also vengekill: schadd

Please stop.

if that's to the top part, i agree, having been a mod the one time. also, because there are things to do at rvs that are 700x more interesting, as demonstrated
if it's to the bottom part i agree for different reasons

Dylan is my top townread now. Congrats Dylan!

really? he has seemed a bit over-newbie to me. is that town, though, hm

hey fun fact, "mafia goon" is an anagram of "goof mania"

hm, actually this looks like you looked into your role pm after the start of the game. vot: schadd, I am serious.

Is this legit?

yeah, this sucks. especially because, contextually, it was pretty obviously directed at faust

[UmbrageOfSnow]

                                     Vote Count 1.2


schadd (3): LaLight, Roadrunner7671, faust
LaLight (2): IDontPlayThisGame, SpaceAnemone
Faust (1): schadd

Not Voting (7): Calamitas, Awaclus, Dylan32, gkrieg13, Robz888, JaketheBaseballGod22, mcmcsalot

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Day 1 ends Monday February 13 at 10 PM U.S. Eastern Time.

[Robz888]

Why all the talk about day-vigging

[LaLight]

two wagons already!

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Vote: schadd Why not.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

yeah, schadd, that was bad. dayvig: schadd

vote: Robz, he's scum.

I'm actually not, this time! It's weird and makes me care less. But i will try anyway

i think that i am just going to lynch you if you do more of this. it's really not interesting

It probably does not matter a lot, but claiming "Not dayvig" through silly jokes isn't the best idea ever.

i don't really agree

vote: WW

Also vengekill: schadd

Please stop.

if that's to the top part, i agree, having been a mod the one time. also, because there are things to do at rvs that are 700x more interesting, as demonstrated
if it's to the bottom part i agree for different reasons

Dylan is my top townread now. Congrats Dylan!

really? he has seemed a bit over-newbie to me. is that town, though, hm

hey fun fact, "mafia goon" is an anagram of "goof mania"

hm, actually this looks like you looked into your role pm after the start of the game. vot: schadd, I am serious.

Is this legit?

yeah, this sucks. especially because, contextually, it was pretty obviously directed at faust

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

[mcmcsalot]

Hey everyone! I agree with what people are saying about schaad, the dayvig stuff is super anti town to say.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Hey everyone! I agree with what people are saying about schaad, the dayvig stuff is super anti town to say.

I don't know if it's super anti town but it's ridiculous which in turn is anti town.

[LaLight]

That's typical schadd's joke, but i appreciate moving out of rvs.

[faust]

Hey everyone! I agree with what people are saying about schaad, the dayvig stuff is super anti town to say.

Who has been saying that?

[faust]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

[faust]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

But if it's the same "If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0" then how can you gain more info? Just saying it's a bit early to calling anyone being  "a bit over-newbie to me" or talking about post counts where as there's much more substantive things like what people have said like the dayvig stuff.

[IDontPlayThisGame]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

But if it's the same "If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0" then how can you gain more info? Just saying it's a bit early to calling anyone being  "a bit over-newbie to me" or talking about post counts where as there's much more substantive things like what people have said like the dayvig stuff.

What? Also, you brought up post counts.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

But if it's the same "If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0" then how can you gain more info? Just saying it's a bit early to calling anyone being  "a bit over-newbie to me" or talking about post counts where as there's much more substantive things like what people have said like the dayvig stuff.

What? Also, you brought up post counts.

the post counts were in reference to the same amount of info after 200 posts as 4 posts thing.

[IDontPlayThisGame]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

The first mention of post counts.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

The first mention of post counts.

But my point was in reference to fausts post where the whole post including the post counts didn't make much sense whereas the post count in my question was to reference a time table for the context. I can change it to two pages if you would like.

[Calamitas]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

But if it's the same "If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0" then how can you gain more info? Just saying it's a bit early to calling anyone being  "a bit over-newbie to me" or talking about post counts where as there's much more substantive things like what people have said like the dayvig stuff.

What? Also, you brought up post counts.

the post counts were in reference to the same amount of info after 200 posts as 4 posts thing.

For the record, faust never said anything like that.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

[faust]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

But if it's the same "If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0" then how can you gain more info? Just saying it's a bit early to calling anyone being  "a bit over-newbie to me" or talking about post counts where as there's much more substantive things like what people have said like the dayvig stuff.

Let X be the amount of information gained from 4 posts. Then the amount of information gained from 200 posts should be roughly 50*X. (blah blah simplified; let's assume no night in between)

You're saying that X=0. But then 50*X=0 as well. I posit that after 200 posts, you will have some information on a player's alignment. So 50*X>0. From this follows that X>0. But of course all the same it holds that 50*X > X.

[Roadrunner7671]

Where's calamitas?

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How can you tell that after 4 posts?

If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0. Thus even 4 posts on average contain a positive amount of information on alignment.

Then why do people always rip on early reads lists if that's true?

Because there is still more information after 200 posts.

But if it's the same "If the amount of information gained from 4 posts would be 0, then the information gained from 200 posts would also be 0" then how can you gain more info? Just saying it's a bit early to calling anyone being  "a bit over-newbie to me" or talking about post counts where as there's much more substantive things like what people have said like the dayvig stuff.

Let X be the amount of information gained from 4 posts. Then the amount of information gained from 200 posts should be roughly 50*X. (blah blah simplified; let's assume no night in between)

You're saying that X=0. But then 50*X=0 as well. I posit that after 200 posts, you will have some information on a player's alignment. So 50*X>0. From this follows that X>0. But of course all the same it holds that 50*X > X.

Yes thank you for clearing that up but I just want schadd to answer my question.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Where's calamitas?

What do you mean?