Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[IDontPlayThisGame]

vote: Jake

Any reasons?

Don't you kind of want to vote Jake as well?

I am interested to listen to IDPTG's reasons

His first post says he's back and votes RR out of the blue. His second post is calling out Alec for lurking, telling him to post so he doesn't get lynched. We then get nothing from Jake. It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

vote: Jake

Any reasons?

Don't you kind of want to vote Jake as well?

I am interested to listen to IDPTG's reasons

His first post says he's back and votes RR out of the blue. His second post is calling out Alec for lurking, telling him to post so he doesn't get lynched. We then get nothing from Jake. It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification.

I always vote RR at the start of the game and As I was reread I noticed Alec is lurking which is why I called him out. It was also 1am in the morning when I posted so then I went to bed. Also that's really bad reasoning anyway.

[LaLight]

Overdefencing.

Vote: Jake

[faust]

Overdefencing.

Vote: Jake

What would have been the correct amount of defencing in your opinion?

[LaLight]

Overdefencing.

Vote: Jake

What would have been the correct amount of defencing in your opinion?

In my opinion when someone votes for you telling openly that the vote is RVSish, there's no need to defend yourself at all, you can just commit more reads. Am I not right?

[LaLight]

Therefore, scum, especially more or less newb!scum is afraid of any vote and tries to take all the suspicion out of themselves. I did so in M86, I remember how i paniked when got RVS post and answered with overdefenseness.

[Haddock]

Vote Count 1.4

faust (2): Calamitas, Joseph
Calamitas (1): faust
Roadrunner7671 (1): JaketheBaseballGod22
Jake (2): IDontPlayThisGame, Lalight

Not Voting (3): NotTheRealAlec, Roadrunner7671, gkrieg13

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch. Day 1 ends Wednesday 7th December at 2pm forum time.

[Roadrunner7671]

Therefore, scum, especially more or less newb!scum is afraid of any vote and tries to take all the suspicion out of themselves. I did so in M86, I remember how i paniked when got RVS post and answered with overdefenseness.

Eh, I,don't think this is strong enough for me. Pushing a Jake lynch is (in my opinion) a little scummy because it's just so easy!

[gkrieg13]

Therefore, scum, especially more or less newb!scum is afraid of any vote and tries to take all the suspicion out of themselves. I did so in M86, I remember how i paniked when got RVS post and answered with overdefenseness.

Eh, I,don't think this is strong enough for me. Pushing a Jake lynch is (in my opinion) a little scummy because it's just so easy!

But it always feels so good!

[faust]

Overdefencing.

Vote: Jake

What would have been the correct amount of defencing in your opinion?

In my opinion when someone votes for you telling openly that the vote is RVSish, there's no need to defend yourself at all, you can just commit more reads. Am I not right?

No. Defending yourself, even against weak accusations, is always good because it garners reactions and keeps the game moving. It is therefore a pro-town move. I think scum are generally more likely to ignore votes on them.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Overdefencing.

Vote: Jake

What would have been the correct amount of defencing in your opinion?

In my opinion when someone votes for you telling openly that the vote is RVSish, there's no need to defend yourself at all, you can just commit more reads. Am I not right?

Well one he never said it was RVS and two I already have a lot of votes on me so I felt the need to defend myself.

[Roadrunner7671]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

[IDontPlayThisGame]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

If he is scum and it's hitting too close to home

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

"It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification."

This is not RVS it's a actual case despite being a bad one. Also Alec really needs to post way more just saying that he is major lurking.

[Roadrunner7671]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

"It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification."

This is not RVS it's a actual case despite being a bad one. Also Alec really needs to post way more just saying that he is major lurking.

That's the definition of RVS. Voting for someone simply because it's early in the game.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

"It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification."

This is not RVS it's a actual case despite being a bad one. Also Alec really needs to post way more just saying that he is major lurking.

That's the definition of RVS. Voting for someone simply because it's early in the game.

He created a actual case which I felt the need to defuse and also I always defuse any case against me. It's part of how I play. If I haven't played with you look back at my previous games and you will see this is true

[faust]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

"It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification."

This is not RVS it's a actual case despite being a bad one. Also Alec really needs to post way more just saying that he is major lurking.

That's the definition of RVS. Voting for someone simply because it's early in the game.

That's plainly wrong. Go back and read Idon's post.

[Roadrunner7671]

How could that possibly have not been RVS?

"It's early enough in the game that I'm comfortable putting my vote on him for now with only that as justification."

This is not RVS it's a actual case despite being a bad one. Also Alec really needs to post way more just saying that he is major lurking.

That's the definition of RVS. Voting for someone simply because it's early in the game.

That's plainly wrong. Go back and read Idon's post.

I misread Jake's post, I thought he said his vote on me wasn't RVS.

[faust]

Also, I saw that Joseph is VLA, but where is Alec?

Prod: Alec

We need a little more input from you!

[Roadrunner7671]

Is it allowed to ask him IRL to post more? Because sending a message to his PMs probably won't do anything, it's not like he's doing other stuff on the forums and just forgot about this game.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Is it allowed to ask him IRL to post more? Because sending a message to his PMs probably won't do anything, it's not like he's doing other stuff on the forums and just forgot about this game.

Your not allowed to speak scum lord

[faust]

Is it allowed to ask him IRL to post more? Because sending a message to his PMs probably won't do anything, it's not like he's doing other stuff on the forums and just forgot about this game.

Don't PMs usually notify our email though? Unless you deactivate that option.

I don't know about asking him IRL. It's uh a thin line. Would wait for mod decision before taking any action.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Is it allowed to ask him IRL to post more? Because sending a message to his PMs probably won't do anything, it's not like he's doing other stuff on the forums and just forgot about this game.

Don't PMs usually notify our email though? Unless you deactivate that option.

I don't know about asking him IRL. It's uh a thin line. Would wait for mod decision before taking any action.

They don't do that for me.

[faust]

Has Jake been scum before? Because this reads like town!Jake to me, but I'd like to check against a scum game.

[JaketheBaseballGod22]

Has Jake been scum before? Because this reads like town!Jake to me, but I'd like to check against a scum game.

Look at my signature