Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 58  All

Author Topic: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Game Over - Mafia Win!  (Read 129166 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

iguanaiguana

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 600
  • Shuffle iT Username: iguana iguana
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #850 on: June 14, 2016, 01:41:53 pm »

Poor Joseph is trying to just read a book, and Roadrunner won't leave him alone.
Logged
Point iguana. Not that points really matter with a result, but still.
Igu is town or trying the hardest he ever has as scum.

ced

  • Salvager
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #851 on: June 14, 2016, 02:56:39 pm »

unvote

As per faust's logic, because Jimmmm and Seprix were partners and Jimmmm was mafia, Seprix should be IC right?

Are spec chats here spoiler-free as a rule?

I'm kinda with Joseph here.  Why would scum pass up the opportunity to either kill a doctor or kill two townies simultaneously?  Makes it fairly likely to my mind that one of RR and Joseph is scum.  I would guess RR, I think?  But this we can find out.

On play, I'd instinctively say that RR is town and Joseph is scum - RR for reasons I mentioned yesterday, and Joseph because I feel he was scummy to begin with and did end up lurking through the Jimmm lynch. But they did between them basically get the Jimmm lynch going, and Joseph even left his vote on Jimmm right to then end. Is there even a dichotomy here?

But also: gkrieg said some scummy stuff in our QT last night. The main thing is that he asked who I was requesting, which I found odd, but he also said something that I wouldn't exactly call a scumslip but seemed to imply he was speaking from a scum perspective. It's enough to make me want to vote: gkrieg

I did note that gkrieg (in 642), suggests the before-the-fact request claim, but I didn't like the way he framed the suggestion as originally being from me.
What is the other thing he said?

I wrote this amazing long post, but I accidentally closed the window like a complete idiot. I don't want to write all of that stuff again right now, so here's the tl;dr: Basically, I confirmed that Awaclus and Haddock are town, that Silverspawn is likely town, and thus the alternatives are Ced, gkreig and Iguana as scum partners.

I'd like to hear more details on this, if you could. In particular, why did you say you "think you know the next scum" in 807?
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #852 on: June 14, 2016, 03:26:16 pm »

I'd like to hear more details on this, if you could. In particular, why did you say you "think you know the next scum" in 807?

Yes, I guess I'll have to get back to writing that thing all over again.
Logged
DM me for ideas on a new article, either here or on Discord (I check Discord way more often)

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #853 on: June 14, 2016, 05:08:47 pm »

But also: gkrieg said some scummy stuff in our QT last night. The main thing is that he asked who I was requesting, which I found odd, but he also said something that I wouldn't exactly call a scumslip but seemed to imply he was speaking from a scum perspective. It's enough to make me want to vote: gkrieg

I did note that gkrieg (in 642), suggests the before-the-fact request claim, but I didn't like the way he framed the suggestion as originally being from me.
What is the other thing he said?

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #854 on: June 14, 2016, 05:09:09 pm »

I mean it's not the greatest case and I'm open to other ideas but it was something I thought was worth telling people about.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 725
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Doc Cod
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #855 on: June 14, 2016, 05:17:29 pm »

I'd also be totally up for a gkrieg lynch. 

The people who I think are lynchable right now, are
gkrieg, Seprix, and Joseph/RR (would have to reread to know which, but my instinct is to think RR is scummier).
I need to reread to see if these change and/or put them in an order. 

Iguana could also be a candidate, maybe.
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (3-1, 75%): 42, 47, 49 - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - 42.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #856 on: June 14, 2016, 05:26:22 pm »

I still think it would be a good idea to claim who we all requested. 

I don't think the way I said it in the qt constitutesa scum slip at all
Logged

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #857 on: June 14, 2016, 05:27:48 pm »

I guess it's a theory debate about whether or not it is best to pick your biggest scum read or not
Logged

Joseph2302

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 858
  • Shuffle iT Username: Joseph2302
  • "Better to be lucky than good"
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #858 on: June 14, 2016, 05:38:40 pm »

I still think it would be a good idea to claim who we all requested. 
I'm in favour of that.
More information is always a good way to try & catch scum out.
Logged
Mafia Stats: (correct as of 2017)
Town: 22 games, 8 wins
Scum: 5 games, 3 wins

silverspawn

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5342
  • Shuffle iT Username: sty.silver
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #859 on: June 14, 2016, 05:45:01 pm »

vote: gkrieg

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #860 on: June 14, 2016, 05:48:14 pm »

Where is that alleged scumslip again? I'll reread gkrieg soon, he is part of my list of candidates. I'll reread everyone on that list eventually.
Logged
DM me for ideas on a new article, either here or on Discord (I check Discord way more often)

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #861 on: June 14, 2016, 05:51:04 pm »

Where is that alleged scumslip again? I'll reread gkrieg soon, he is part of my list of candidates. I'll reread everyone on that list eventually.

It is unfortunately in his and my QT from D1 (it happened N1) so it's not available for anyone else to read. My post up there is my attempt to describe it as well as I can without directly quoting.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #862 on: June 14, 2016, 05:51:57 pm »

And I might be ok with after the fact claiming (like, we could do it right now), but asking while the process was still ongoing struck me as odd.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #863 on: June 14, 2016, 06:00:19 pm »

And I might be ok with after the fact claiming (like, we could do it right now), but asking while the process was still ongoing struck me as odd.

Honestly I would've asked earlier, but you weren't very present in our QT.
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #864 on: June 14, 2016, 06:29:18 pm »

I asked for ADK, as he seems the most townie player, just so you all know.
Logged
DM me for ideas on a new article, either here or on Discord (I check Discord way more often)

Roadrunner7671

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1845
  • Shuffle iT Username: Roadrunner7672
  • Forum Mafia Record: 18-33-2
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #865 on: June 14, 2016, 06:41:47 pm »

I requested Haddock because I thought he'd be fun to talk to.
Logged
Oh God someone delete this before Roadrunner sees it.

Haddock

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 725
  • Shuffle iT Username: Haddock
  • Doc Cod
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #866 on: June 14, 2016, 06:53:33 pm »

I'm fine with claiming who we requested.

I requested Joseph.  I picked someone I thought was towny, for better vote-control.  I'm aware there are arguments to the contrary, but eh.
Logged
The best reason to lynch Haddock is the meltdown we get to witness on the wagon runup. I mean, we should totally wagon him every day just for the lulz.

M Town Wins-Losses (6-2, 75%): 71, 72, 76, 81, 83, 87 - 79, 82.  M Scum Wins-Losses (2-1, 67%): 80, 101 - 70.
RMM Town Wins-Losses (3-1, 75%): 42, 47, 49 - 31.  RMM Scum Wins-Losses (3-3, 50%): 33, 37, 43 - 29, 32, 35.
Modded: M75, M84, RMM38.     Mislynched (M-RMM): None - 42.     Correctly lynched (M-RMM): 101 - 33, 33, 35.       MVPs: RMM37, M87

ced

  • Salvager
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #867 on: June 14, 2016, 07:05:03 pm »

I didn't really know, so I no-requested.
Logged

A Drowned Kernel

  • 2015 World Champion
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1067
  • They/Them
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #868 on: June 14, 2016, 07:22:58 pm »

I requested RR because I had a mild scumread on him and thought he would be interesting to talk to.
Logged
The perfect engine
But it will never go off
Three piles are empty

gkrieg13

  • Board Moderator
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 509
  • Shuffle iT Username: gkrieg
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #869 on: June 14, 2016, 08:01:30 pm »

I requested seprix because I thought he was scummy and would be good to talk to
Logged

Seprix

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5607
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #870 on: June 14, 2016, 08:09:35 pm »

I requested seprix because I thought he was scummy and would be good to talk to

lol
Logged
DM me for ideas on a new article, either here or on Discord (I check Discord way more often)

Joseph2302

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 858
  • Shuffle iT Username: Joseph2302
  • "Better to be lucky than good"
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #871 on: June 15, 2016, 02:20:14 am »

I requested Haddock because I thought he'd be fun to talk to.
Wait, you told me you were picking your top scum read.
Logged
Mafia Stats: (correct as of 2017)
Town: 22 games, 8 wins
Scum: 5 games, 3 wins

Joseph2302

  • Jester
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 858
  • Shuffle iT Username: Joseph2302
  • "Better to be lucky than good"
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #872 on: June 15, 2016, 02:20:50 am »

I'm fine with claiming who we requested.

I requested Joseph.  I picked someone I thought was towny, for better vote-control.  I'm aware there are arguments to the contrary, but eh.
I picked Haddock because I thought he was towny.
Logged
Mafia Stats: (correct as of 2017)
Town: 22 games, 8 wins
Scum: 5 games, 3 wins

iguanaiguana

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 600
  • Shuffle iT Username: iguana iguana
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #873 on: June 15, 2016, 05:59:56 am »

At the very end of the night, EFHW told me, play this game or die. I didn't want to be that guy who gets mod-killed,

so I picked Faust.

Because secretly, I actually like Faust.

Then he got killed at night because of bad meta that I don't understand.
Logged
Point iguana. Not that points really matter with a result, but still.
Igu is town or trying the hardest he ever has as scum.

Awaclus

  • Adventurer
  • ******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11824
  • Shuffle iT Username: Awaclus
  • (´。• ω •。`)
    • View Profile
    • Birds of Necama
Re: Mafia 82: Speed-Dating Mafia - Day 2
« Reply #874 on: June 15, 2016, 06:52:06 am »

I requested faust because I had a scum read on him so it would have been pretty good to become lovers with him, also I didn't want to lose my ability to vote for Seprix who was an even bigger scum read.
Logged
Bomb, Cannon, and many of the Gunpowder cards can strongly effect gameplay, particularly in a destructive way

The YouTube channel where I make musicDownload my band's Creative Commons albums for free
Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 58  All
 

Page created in 0.069 seconds with 20 queries.