@Haddock let me see if I can respond something productive
silverspawn's very early post has some day actions in bold. I wonder whether he was trying to put down a vote for them without people realising? Bit of a stretch.
I didn't know just posting them in bold is voting for them.
ss does a random unexplained WW vote and then revotes me in the same post! Sup with that?
Just a way of stating that I find you both scummy
86]
So was I the only player who mistakenly thought he had received a scum role because of the explanatory red text in the second QT post only to notice the green town role after the first post...
Do you guys buy this? I don't know about you, but I find the green very visible among the maroon - not red - that made up the first two posts of my QT. Even if I had not seen the green, I think I'd have been more busy being surprised that you can use colors in QT's - I think ash has a premium account - to think that I got scum.
That one's weak on its own.[/quote]
It's an odd way of attacking someone by saying an early day 1 case looks weak, because of course he does. I think it's non-irrelevant, which is why I brought it up. That's really the only example you bring.
86]SirMartin's post "You can call me scummy, etc.." looks towny to me.
And then SS calls him scummy for it. OK.
This post?
And you can call me scummy, but all this talk about our group actions is really scummy. They probably have a marginal impact on the game, this isn't what mafia is about. We need to ignore all the shiny distractions and lynch the scums.
This post is scummy no doubt. It's a way of appearing as though you really want the game to move forward by using an argument that doesn't make sense, because it's RMM of course we should discuss the setup. Why do you think that post is towny?