Silverspawn's very early post has some day actions in bold. I wonder whether he was trying to put down a vote for them without people realising? Bit of a stretch.
RR makes a post indicating some extra knowledge of how Split Up works fairly early on. I don't like it.
Faust's vote thing is weird. But I believe him. There's no real scum motivation for it.
I agree with SS that chairs's thing saying we want to get it to an odd number of players is a bit dodgy.
WW and RR both rolefishing, me no likey.
SS does a random unexplained WW vote and then revotes me in the same post! Sup with that?
I don't like ADK advocating that we split up. I screwed this one up I think, not thinking it through properly. But I don't see ADK making that mistake.
(He votes me not long after - love that my record of being found scummy D1 in every mafia game ever is still ongoing.)
I like yuma's comments throughout. Towny.
SS suspecting yuma looks bad. I actually have a few posts of SS's that I don't like. Eg:
So was I the only player who mistakenly thought he had received a scum role because of the explanatory red text in the second QT post only to notice the green town role after the first post...
Do you guys buy this? I don't know about you, but I find the green very visible among the maroon - not red - that made up the first two posts of my QT. Even if I had not seen the green, I think I'd have been more busy being surprised that you can use colors in QT's - I think ash has a premium account - to think that I got scum.
That one's weak on its own. But there's a few weird/scummy posts.
RR has some weirdness claiming there's no scum faction and is STILL rolefishing. Oh and then he votes yuma for no good reason.
e makes a towny post about setup not long after. I don't like finding e towny, that's quite rare for me.
I do not like WW's vote on chairs. chairs makes a perfectly legitimate comment about RR's push for us to split up - and WW baldy votes him.
Wait, then SS and ADK do the same thing! Huh, ok. This is good. I am not liking SS or RR here. And ADK slightly iffy too.
SirMartin's post "You can call me scummy, etc.." looks towny to me.
And then SS calls him scummy for it. OK.
In this rather biased light (of finding RR and SS scummy), RR's fight with SS about whether or not to split up starts looking a bit forced. (ie this:
DO NOT SPLIT UP
It has very likely zero benefit according to the description, since we are already checking the peremiter. I am pretty sure we should do one of the two, not both. We don't know what disadvantages it can have. Don't cast any more votes on it.
)
Huh, faust's case on chairs is actually not bad. But it goes against all the stuff that I'd thought. That makes things hard.
I think I come down on the side of backing myself. If it's SS+RR vs chairs I prefer to find SS and RR scummy.
I think the case on e is weak. There are many things he could have done that caused his votelessness. There's not necessarily any reason to connect it to yuma.
I DO NOT LIKE RR's talk about "putting down" yuma and then artificially "trying to find a solution".
ADK accusing EFHW of lurking - not sure that's legit - there must be other lurkier people.
yuma's claim is very convincing.
ADK's timing thing is a bit scummy. And then he votes gkrieg for following him onto e? Weird.
That's my stream of consciousness reread. It comes to a
vote: silverspawnWould happily do ADK or RR instead.
PPE 2.
Author
Topic: RMM32: The Walking Dead (Game Over.) (Read 157030 times)