Apart from people that are completely absent, WW and silver are the guys I have the least of a read on, so let's check out what they did so far.
silver:
QT talk early, then a vote for Awalcus
Complains about noone doing RVS. Well he isn't doing RVS. That's a tad weird. Then he says he has 15 posts in his QT, "no reason to spam the thread with them". Huh. What are these posts about one wonders, considering silver has not yet added something substantial to the game. Now substantial stuff happens: he defends yuma and thinks all the wagons we have are bad (including the Awaclus wagon, which he is a part of). Votes for Hydrad. Believes in Teproc's town slip. Immediately afterwards he questions Teproc's Hydrad vote... what? He votes RR because he does not believe RR's early vote on me was RVS (Like what? Why lie about that?), and because of "tunneling" me (he has made exactly one post stating that he thinks I'm scum). Then switches to Hydrad again, for what reason I cannot fathom. Then joins on the yuma wagon, which was supposed to be bad earlier. Thinks Lekkit is scummy because of the Teproc case. But why? Because he disagrees. Bad. Continues to read me as town, how convenient.
WW:
Also starts with QT talk. Joke. Theory. Joke. Joke. He believes ADK's claim quickly. Votes Egor out of the blue. Boom! Suddenly a long post. Gives reads and such. Makes a lot of sense actually. Does not feel like lynching Awaclus, good. Disagrees with Lekkit's Teproc case, but still finds him townie - also good. Votes for gkrieg, I don't know about that, maybe.
Sorry about the style, I just watched a Sherlock episode, it gets to you.
Anyway, I think after the reread that WW is quite townie and silver is quite scummy. silver's play is just so all over the place and it doesn't feel natural. It feels like bad reasoning and inconsistency for the sake of it.
Vote: silverPPE: 5