EgorK: Not much from him. His posts don't look very good though. I would say null - scummy
chairs: Actually making sense even though he is sick. Get well soon! null - townie
Lekkit: I like the case and then defense of the case on Teproc. Seems very genuine and like scum hunting. townie
Hydrad: Most of his posts are fluff, but he has a couple posts in there that look like he is playing the game at least. null
ADK: IC, with no counterclaim, I totally believe this
RR: Being very weird this game. He is lurking much more than usual, he is not defending himself (I don't remember if this is normal for him), and he has voted once and left his vote on the same person this whole game. null -but I'll be keeping my eye on him
Awaclus - He's being anti-town, but in his townie way. I think people always get into arguments with him and he tends to hold his ground better as town. Anyway, I don't really believe that he would've /outted in any situation, so I don't let that play into my read of him. null - townie.
WW: He has votes that are kind of strange. This could be town trying to push people to think of different options than the current wagons, or scum doing the same thing. They are both on lurkers, which is a very safe vote D1. He defends Teproc, who I have a gut scum read on. null
silverspawn: ss's need to post in RVS seems strange to me. In his last few town games he was extremely absent, here he seems to be more active. He goes back and forth on yuma, saying that paranoid yuma is town!yuma, then voting him for that reason. Throws votes around a lot, but for good reasons. null - scummy (but only slightly)
yuma: I don't agree with his assesment of whether the counterclaim should occur today or not. I think a counterclaim should occur today because 1v1 D1 is definitely worth it. His being emotional is a null tell, but it feels different than in the game where he was scum and got emotional last (switch mafia I think). While I don't approve of his tunneling on Awaclus, I don't feel like he is overdoing it yet. I don't think that emotional!yuma is very productive at all, which means town members should give him a break for a little bit to let him simmer down. You should stay in the game if you can though. It's always fun playing with you for me!
Teproc: I will start out saying I have a gut scum read on Teproc. I actually agree with his theory posts. His post that nothing is happening means scum must be lurking seemed odd to me. I don't think that inactivity absolutely means inactive scum. I think it just means that there isn't anything to talk about. For me it was just that I wasn't really interested in the discussion you faust and yuma were having. I think my gut scum read on you comes from you sticking with the yuma argument for longer than I think was necessary. Your read of faust not going to all this trouble as scum is troubling to me. I don't buy it. I don't think Awaclus has been anti town enough to warrant us lynching him today and not using night actions. That seems like a horrible idea. I also don't really like your defense of yourself. scum
faust: has a lot of good theory talk. I like his claim/counterclaim scenarios. I don't like his argument with yuma. I don't agree so much with his reread of yuma. It seems very scum tainted, which I think is more likely to come from town!faust. He is very sure of himself as town and I have been caught on the bad end of his tunneling before. Out of all of this, I get a town read on faust, but I hope everyone stops arguing over the non-mafia related things.