What do you mean?
I mean the post makes literally no sense. I just told everyone "don't trust Egor regardless of what you think about me" and you reply saying "Why doesn't Tables care about keeping me off mission." Like, I literally just said the exact opposite thing. I don't think I've even mentioned once about keeping Ghost off of missions, especially considering my read on Ghost is somewhat liberal.
Not only that but apparently I'm making a "ridiculous amount of scumslips?" Like, if I were a fascist I would agree, because zero scumslips is pretty ridiculous. But you know, it's easy to not scumslip, when you aren't scum.
Basically, what this is boiling down to is, Egor is not making any sense any more. He knows he's backed into a corner, and seems to be getting desperate to try and make me look bad, but since there's nothing there to actually latch on to, is just throwing out wild accusations, such as implying I'm scumslipping but choosing not to demonstrate it to everyone (why? Because he can't, but wants to raise suspicion on me as much as possible).
Only plausible case is Tables is fascist, I am liberal, and he tries to safeguard against being outed somehow later in he game/cast some shadow in my direction
Or if you're fascist, I'm liberal, and I want to remind everyone that even if they suspect me, they should still never trust you. Which it is, since
if one cares to look back at when it was posted, you'll see I was directly quoting someone who was suggesting it being a case of A or B, while ignoring the possibility of C. And so I pointed out the logical error. Which, as one will note, is something I've done on more than one occasion, regardless of whether it benefits me.
Honestly, you seem really intent to blow this one comment completely away from it's context, then blow it completely out of proportion. It was a two sentence reply just making note of a possibility ghost had overlooked. It even contained the phrase "I know this is kinda splitting hairs," so it's not even like I was trying to make a big deal of it. I wanted to point out the error and also make sure that even if people think I'm likely scum, they don't go thinking Arch and you are cleared as a result.
Why are you cincerned about egirk looking worse ib the process? And how much worse can he look to you when hecis confirmed fascist to you
Go home, Grujah, you're drunk. But hopefully I've made this clear above already. I'm quite happy to point out the dirt around Egor, since it makes it less likely a fascist will be elected. If he says something that doesn't make sense, I'm going to call it out, for this reason, and also so I can actually respond to whatever point was being tried to be made.
I'm going to nominate faust. If you're liberal, you'll yes on vote this.
Nominate: faust
I don't like that closing statement there, but... yeah, I think this is the best possible proposal.
You really think EgorK is more likely to be fascist than Tables? I definitely agree that ghost is conf!fascist. His reads list seems very fabricated. He says that I have a fine voting record and that Hydrad has a poor voting record, when we have voted the same every time.
I haven't really been suspicious of ghost, I still has a slight liberal read on him, but regardless I really struggle to see how he's anything close to confirmed fascist.
Author
Topic: Secret Hitler I [Round 12] (Read 73322 times)