Who else is voting for me ?
Ampharos... well he's going back to his gut read, fine I guess.
WW is wrong and he's been right too much to back down, annoying.
faust might be scum, otherwise... why am I scum again ? Ah yes, my claim. I guess so. I don't know what I can do about that... I claimed when I did because I thought I had caught scum. I hadn't, but I think I would have been forced to claim by a massclaim anyway (though I'd have opposed it). I don't know what more I can say... I think you'll find if you reread me that my play is that of a townie who doesn't want to be NKed and ended up going a bit too far into the other direction.
iguana I can work with, because this feels like OMGUS more than anything else. I guess I didn't answer on the vagueness thing : I understand there's a town!narrative for that, but the way it ended up put you in a very comfortable position if you're scum, because you got to react to stuff. Not muchyou can doabout that, sure, but there it is. As for Vanillaiser, I can eeasily see a scenario where a scum Vanillaiser exists and you claim that because he's only targeted VTs... actually I can't easily see that, why wouldn't you vanillaise faust ?
Yeah, why wouldn't you vanillaise faust if there's a vanillaiser out there ? Like, how does that make any sense at all. I think this must mean one of {iguana, faust} is scum at least right ?
Because either
a) they're both scum, great, let's lynch one of them
b) iguana is town and there is a Vanillaiser, in which case faust is scum because there's no way he doesn't get Vanillaised. Not getting killed makes sense (yuma was never getting lynched, faust might), but Vanillaising some random unclaimed townie instead ?
c) iguana is making the Vanillaiser up and faust is town. Maybe. Pretty creative, but maybe. Goes against my scum narrative for iguana's claim too.
d) They're both town. That doesn't work, because faust should have been vanillaised.
WHy aren't we lynching faust ?