No, the interaction itself isn't scummy. It is the fact that silverspawn was the NK. When in doubt, as scum, I have always tended to kill someone who I see as obviously townie. Someone that I won't be able to set up for a mislynch later on down the road. Someone like faust or witherweaver or....silverspawn.
I think you are more likely to kill silverspawn. Especially because you are the one who immediately comes out and does NK analysis. Something no one else really did because we had a faust claim fairly early.
Also, "straight-up lying" is straight-up lying. I am not going to quote everything you say. The bit about EgorK: I actually went back and double checked that. I was hoping to find you 100% saying EgorK is town on D1 then I was going to nail you as scummy for your vote D2. I didn't find that. And I also reflected that you had a developing read on EgorK D1. I linked where you defended him and where you voted him.
As far as I go, sure, you didn't always have me as your #1 lynch, but you were basically the lone voice in the wilderness talking about lynching me and putting up cases against me. I am not talking about every second of every day, but I consistently pop up as a lynch candidate. EgorK doesn't pop up as much, and yeah, someone like Hydrad might pop up more. But EgorK is enough of a read that you have voted him D1 and D2. You have voted me D1 and D2.
Consistency. Voting records, not lies.
On a side note, RR. This is why voting is so important. It shows your current reads. Call me "lazy" for not reading the context of each vote. But if I see a vote for a person, I will assume your current read is "scum."