I guess that could be a difference between our playstyles - I like direct evidence better than reads. Of course I understand that for you the WW situation is also more difficult than more me because you have to consider the possibility that I am scum.
It isn't that I don't like direct evidence. It is superior to reads quite often. But I think we have an opportunity here to gather more direct evidence, or rather evidence of whether or not the evidence that you are providing is actually direct or not.
If this were an open game with a tracker and you had tracked WW as killing the person who died in the night and there was a complete absence of any redirection role in the game we would be lynching him. But it isn't. I would like more evidence that your evidence is substantial. Or at least I would like to give an opportunity to see if we can learn if your evidence can be substantiated.