WW as scum had created a very weak breadcrumb which he could fall back on in any scenario where he was suspected.
Can we please stop making this argument? It's just straightup bad.
Haven't seen a good explanation for why it's a bad argument. You easily could have done exactly what I propose.
To clarify, is this the "WW is a Mafia Motion Detector with Daredevil as a fakeclaim" argument, or something else ?
It's the "WW looked at his past posts and made up a breadcrumb" argument... I think...
But why the fuck did I make the post in the first place?
You don't make "hey let me throw this post out there in case I need to make up a fake story later and pretend it's a breadcrumb" posts. As scum, you are afraid of your posts falling under scrutiny. You don't just post a bunch of shit and hope that one of them a mgically falls perfectly into place later.
This argument *could* have some merit if you think scum planned to push a massclaim today, so I already figured out my fakeclaim last night and planned to do it all along. Or if Faust and I are partners in some dumb gambit.
But the argument as it is is just terrible.
Ok, so this is a misrepresentation of the original argument that I gave.
This is what I think is at least possible.
On D1, scum!you breadcrumbed daredevil because it was on the list of fakeclaims and you wanted to have your fakeclaim breadcrumbed for D1. This is a trivial argument. Any person who says they have breadcrumbed their flavor could have done this. All this means is that saying "I breadcrumbed my flavor!" and being able to back it up shouldn't give someone a lot of town points.
This is my argument as related to your flavor breadcrumb. In short, I believe it was an authentic breadcrumb, but that doesn't give you town points. Any scum could breadcrumb a fake role from a list. What does give you the most town cred here is that motion detector fits daredevil very well.
What I am arguing in regards to your saying "I don't like a Hydrad lynch today" is that this is too vague of a statement to constitute proven breadcrumbing. You could have made that statement for any number of reasons. And you could have looked back at that statement after you made it and thought "this is what I will latch onto and call my early D2 breadcrumbing of my role's result." It is not a strong enough indication to me that you actually targeted Hydrad and got the result that you claimed to have gotten.
Does all of this somehow make your claim weaker than Faust's? No. Faust's claim is the weaker claim of the two. But neither of them is particularly weak, and neither of them is completely fullproof either. So someone is PROBABLY lying. I just don't know who.