Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Seprix]

UoS wants to know why you are voting Hydrad instead of Mail-mi.

Well, I voted Hydrad not so seriously because he joked about scum partners. I don't see why Mail-Mi would be lynch material, I'd have to go look at what he said.

[Seprix]

Wait a second here.

WHAT!?

I read Mail-Mi's post as if Hydrad posted that. Yeah, I meant to vote for Mail-Mi. Wow.

[Seprix]

unvote

I don't think I'll vote for Mail-Mi over that now, anyways.

[Witherweaver]

You voted for Mail-Mi first...

[Seprix]

Ugh. I'm confused. I'm sorry.

[skip wooznum]

It's also worth noting that if anyone is a cop, vig, or mason, then that person knows the strongman is not a 1-shot

This could be important.

It's useless for town purposes at the moment.  It's true, but we shouldn't talk about it.  One shot of strongman is enough to get by any claiming-protection schemes.  Drop it.

@Skip: If you had to, gun to your head, vote for one of me, Seprix, and Mail-mi right now, who would you vote for and why?

seprix. Because I think he'd be least helpful as town.

PPE: everything since that question

[silverspawn]

Vote Count 1.1

Seprix (5): Hydrad, UmbrageOfSnow, Teproc, pacovf, Awaclus
mail-mi (1): chairs
Hydrad (1): mail-mi
chairs (1): skip wooznum
Teproc (1): Witherweaver

Not Voting (3): Joseph2302, A Drowned Kernel, Seprix

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Day 1 ends on June 28, 3 PM forum time.

[skip wooznum]

My vote on you is no longer random, for example.

this kind of justifying a previous rvs, I don't like.

Again, PPE

[pacovf]

Silver, you break my heart by misspelling my username so 

[skip wooznum]

Well, I don't see any real way out of this. I don't see any better lynches, except maybe Hydrad. The only thing I can say is this: Why am I even a good lynch? Because I'm asking questions?

I don't know how to quote two posts, but this and the next one are weird. Way out of what, the game just started?  What did hydrad do?

[skip wooznum]

I will revert back to Hydrad.

vote: Hydrad

when were you on hydrad?

[Seprix]

I will revert back to Hydrad.

vote: Hydrad

when were you on hydrad?

I confused Mail-Mi with Hydrad. I'm in college right now, with only 3 hours of sleep.

[Witherweaver]

My vote on you is no longer random, for example.

this kind of justifying a previous rvs, I don't like.

Again, PPE

I concur; I've actually only ever seen  scum do this, I think.

[Witherweaver]

Tentative town on Seprix.  Scum usually doesn't forget who they're voting for, even in RVS.

[Teproc]

My vote on you is no longer random, for example.

this kind of justifying a previous rvs, I don't like.

Again, PPE

I concur; I've actually only ever seen  scum do this, I think.

Really ? It seems pretty normal to me : you RVS someone, then you get a real (thgouh weak because early, but still) reason that would push you to vote so you just say that... why would scum even want to do this particularly ?

[Hydrad]

Vote: WW

because I want to see him lynched day 1 once.

[Teproc]

Vote: WW

because I want to see him lynched day 1 once.

Didn't you notice we were out of RVS ? There's actual stuff you could be commenting on.

[silverspawn]

silver, you break my heart by misspelling my username so 

sorry! fixed.

[Hydrad]

Vote: WW

because I want to see him lynched day 1 once.

Didn't you notice we were out of RVS ? There's actual stuff you could be commenting on.

dang it but I enjoy a bit of RVS!

anyways on seprix I guess slight town for him confusing those posts around.

On Umbrage I am liking him sofar also but don't have any sort of read yet.

[mail-mi]

unvote

Hydrad seems like good old Hydrad.

[skip wooznum]

My vote on you is no longer random, for example.

this kind of justifying a previous rvs, I don't like.

Again, PPE

I concur; I've actually only ever seen  scum do this, I think.

Really ? It seems pretty normal to me : you RVS someone, then you get a real (thgouh weak because early, but still) reason that would push you to vote so you just say that... why would scum even want to do this particularly ?

obviously there is also a town narrative, I wasn't claiming otherwise. But I can totally see scum feeling like they have to justify an rvs, or planning an rvs on someone they can easily 'find scummy'

[A Drowned Kernel]

Vote: Seprix

Is this seriously intended?

for RVS its pretty intended.

It's okay, Hydrady! We're all friends! ...Even when we brutally murder each other in social fear of retribution, our hands covered in deep red blood of the innocent and guilty alike...

Small text is against the rules.

[A Drowned Kernel]

Vote: Seprix

Gotta protect my good buddy Liam, I've actually played with him before I think.  More importantly, that flavor was lovely, stop whining about it and give us a kiss Seprix sweetums.

Now, time for setup talk: there's one important thing we know for sure now, scum is a Godfather, a Roleblocker, and either a Strongman or a 1-shot Strongman.  So keeping this in mind, claiming or trying to narrow down other setup options in any way is a bad idea.  We have nothing else to learn beyond whether the Strongman is 1-shot or not, which hardly matters, either way we don't want to rely on any schemes involving a doctor claiming who they are protecting, and scum has quite a bit worth learning.

We might want to consider a mason/non-mason claim or other things like that later on IFF we've got a suspected fakeclaim, but it's too easy for scum to dodge and exploit in general I think.  Claiming schemes are unlikely to work here.

Doesn't everyone have a pony they can claim as their own though?

And Silverspawn is a total fanfiction writer, so it makes sense he'd show off his Rule 34 stuff.


PPE: 1

Oh, and I meant to also say: This should be an end to all setup talk.

Beyond knowing for sure that there is a mafia roleblocker and an at-least-1-shot strongman we have nothing else to gain.  So back to regularly scheduled RVS which should hopefully become a lot less random soon with these two lovely wagons.

Wait, town advocating openly to not talk about set up?

vote: Professor Umbridge

Maybe this is a stretch, but I see no reason to not talk about set-up, even if it is obvious.

This setup is pretty unbreakable, and he's just pointing that out. I see nothing suspicious about that.

[A Drowned Kernel]

Vote: Teproc for standing me up in Paris and leaving me standing alone in the rue with my baguette in my hand.

Innuendo intentional?

Baguettes are a big thing in Paris.

...Innuendo intentional?

[A Drowned Kernel]

I have no clue what scum!Seprix would look like.  He could not possibly be scummier than town!Seprix.

Yeah, pretty much this.