Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Awaclus]

Sorry, I'm a bit tired right now, what I was trying to say is: Why wouldn't scum-who-didn't-anticipate!chairs claim to have looked at silverspawn?

[chairs]

I think joseph is heading to the "well, scum!chairs wants to make sure he claims SS before anybody else so he comes off not-as-scummy for it".  That's an argument I simply don't agree with, as I think scum!anybody really ought to be claiming someone else - maybe their partner, but probably just some random townie that isn't SS (because since they killed SS, it seems reasonable to believe that the folks who claim watching SS will come under unusually high suspicion).

[Hydrad]

Hmm I could see chairs?

Actually I wonder if its WW...

ok so thought process time.

Lets say chairs is town and WW is scum. How willing would WW be to jump on chairs there? I think its a slightly higher chance that scum WW jumps on chairs like that then town.

sure lets try itVote: WW!

[Witherweaver]

Hmm I could see chairs?

Actually I wonder if its WW...

ok so thought process time.

Lets say chairs is town and WW is scum. How willing would WW be to jump on chairs there? I think its a slightly higher chance that scum WW jumps on chairs like that then town.

sure lets try itVote: WW!

Huh?  What if Chairs is scum?

[Hydrad]

Hmm I could see chairs?

Actually I wonder if its WW...

ok so thought process time.

Lets say chairs is town and WW is scum. How willing would WW be to jump on chairs there? I think its a slightly higher chance that scum WW jumps on chairs like that then town.

sure lets try itVote: WW!

Huh?  What if Chairs is scum?

Then your probably town. I just have a slight thought that chairs might be town though.

Also I know that post doesn't really make sense but sometimes that how I try to figure out who scum is and this time I posted a bit of my thought process.

[Witherweaver]

I'm probably settled on one of Joseph or Chairs for today.

Though honestly I don't really remember what my reads were .. hm, I had thought Rubby was town.

I probably need to go reread.

[Rubby]

For now I will again vote: Joseph, although I'm feeling odder about Chairs' posts today, and as I said it would seem bizarre for both scum to claim first and say silverspawn. Don't want to put anyone at L-1 yet. And let's please not self hammer if we are town at L-1.

[Awaclus]

But if you're scum at L-1, then please self hammer.

[chairs]

Ooo, so we can just put everybody at L-1, and if they're scum they'll self-hammer, so guaranteed scum lynch!

[chairs]

(/s)

[Witherweaver]

Ooo, so we can just put everybody at L-1, and if they're scum they'll self-hammer, so guaranteed scum lynch!

I think if you vote for yourself, you'll be at L-1.  Go for it!

[chairs]

Ooo, so we can just put everybody at L-1, and if they're scum they'll self-hammer, so guaranteed scum lynch!

I think if you vote for yourself, you'll be at L-1.  Go for it!

That won't work, how would I show whether I'm self-hammering or not!

[Joseph2302]

Been busy all day, phone post here. Will reread when I get home (2-3 hours).

[Joseph2302]

I think joseph is heading to the "well, scum!chairs wants to make sure he claims SS before anybody else so he comes off not-as-scummy for it".  That's an argument I simply don't agree with, as I think scum!anybody really ought to be claiming someone else - maybe their partner, but probably just some random townie that isn't SS (because since they killed SS, it seems reasonable to believe that the folks who claim watching SS will come under unusually high suspicion).

This was the way I was going, I agree it isn't actually a good argument. I think early claims were towny.

I'm probably settled on one of Joseph or Chairs for today.

Really, because I'm not convinced either of us is. I know for sure I'm not.

[faust]

Vote Count 2.2

chairs (2): Awaclus, Witherweaver
Awaclus (1): chairs
Witherweaver (1): Hydrad
Joseph2302 (1): Rubby

Not Voting (2): EgorK, Joseph2302

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch. Day 2 ends March 16 at 10 am forum time.

[chairs]

vote: WW.

I think "settling on" Joseph or myself is the kind of easy out scum wants to suggest to Town.  Still mostly neutral on Joseph.

[Rubby]

I think "settling on" Joseph or myself is the kind of easy out scum wants to suggest to Town.

What do you mean? What makes it an "easy out"?

[chairs]

Well, let's assume for the moment that Joseph is Town (and for the rest of you, since you don't get to see my PM, that I am as well).  There's at least one potential easy mislynch there based on "one of them HAS to be lying!" and possibly two if you can keep that ball rolling into the next Day.  It's a lynch that people could sheep on based on a surface-sensible argument, one that goes just deep enough for lazy Town (of which I have been guilty in prior games myself) to just vote it and move on.  If I were scum, and I thought I'd get a shot to easy-mode two mislynches, I'd run with it.

[Awaclus]

Well, let's assume for the moment that Joseph is Town (and for the rest of you, since you don't get to see my PM, that I am as well).  There's at least one potential easy mislynch there based on "one of them HAS to be lying!" and possibly two if you can keep that ball rolling into the next Day.  It's a lynch that people could sheep on based on a surface-sensible argument, one that goes just deep enough for lazy Town (of which I have been guilty in prior games myself) to just vote it and move on.  If I were scum, and I thought I'd get a shot to easy-mode two mislynches, I'd run with it.

Well, that's only if both of you are town. I very much doubt that it is the case.

[chairs]

Well, let's assume for the moment that Joseph is Town (and for the rest of you, since you don't get to see my PM, that I am as well).  There's at least one potential easy mislynch there based on "one of them HAS to be lying!" and possibly two if you can keep that ball rolling into the next Day.  It's a lynch that people could sheep on based on a surface-sensible argument, one that goes just deep enough for lazy Town (of which I have been guilty in prior games myself) to just vote it and move on.  If I were scum, and I thought I'd get a shot to easy-mode two mislynches, I'd run with it.

Well, that's only if both of you are town. I very much doubt that it is the case.

Why? Statistically, we're more likely to be Town than scum (I bet I can worfram alpha the numbers on this, given enough patience to figure out the proper context).

[Witherweaver]

You're not more likely to both be town than for one of you to not be town.

[Awaclus]

Well, let's assume for the moment that Joseph is Town (and for the rest of you, since you don't get to see my PM, that I am as well).  There's at least one potential easy mislynch there based on "one of them HAS to be lying!" and possibly two if you can keep that ball rolling into the next Day.  It's a lynch that people could sheep on based on a surface-sensible argument, one that goes just deep enough for lazy Town (of which I have been guilty in prior games myself) to just vote it and move on.  If I were scum, and I thought I'd get a shot to easy-mode two mislynches, I'd run with it.

Well, that's only if both of you are town. I very much doubt that it is the case.

Why? Statistically, we're more likely to be Town than scum (I bet I can worfram alpha the numbers on this, given enough patience to figure out the proper context).

Because you're super scummy.

[chairs]

Well, let's assume for the moment that Joseph is Town (and for the rest of you, since you don't get to see my PM, that I am as well).  There's at least one potential easy mislynch there based on "one of them HAS to be lying!" and possibly two if you can keep that ball rolling into the next Day.  It's a lynch that people could sheep on based on a surface-sensible argument, one that goes just deep enough for lazy Town (of which I have been guilty in prior games myself) to just vote it and move on.  If I were scum, and I thought I'd get a shot to easy-mode two mislynches, I'd run with it.

Well, that's only if both of you are town. I very much doubt that it is the case.

Why? Statistically, we're more likely to be Town than scum (I bet I can worfram alpha the numbers on this, given enough patience to figure out the proper context).

Because you're super scummy.

Why?

[Awaclus]

Well, let's assume for the moment that Joseph is Town (and for the rest of you, since you don't get to see my PM, that I am as well).  There's at least one potential easy mislynch there based on "one of them HAS to be lying!" and possibly two if you can keep that ball rolling into the next Day.  It's a lynch that people could sheep on based on a surface-sensible argument, one that goes just deep enough for lazy Town (of which I have been guilty in prior games myself) to just vote it and move on.  If I were scum, and I thought I'd get a shot to easy-mode two mislynches, I'd run with it.

Well, that's only if both of you are town. I very much doubt that it is the case.

Why? Statistically, we're more likely to be Town than scum (I bet I can worfram alpha the numbers on this, given enough patience to figure out the proper context).

Because you're super scummy.

Why?

Probably because you're scum.

[chairs]

Well, you've certainly convinced me. /s