OK. After thinking about this more and sleeping on it, I think florrat and Jack Rudd are right. Because I suspended the "one rule change per turn" rule, you can cast different votes on each of these proposals. That also means that Jack Rudd is right, only 347, 348, and 349 need all eligible voters (which is everyone before 60 hours) to pass.
So I see 3 ways we can go:
- the non-voters speaks up and say they would have voted yes, meaning everybody is fine with the result. I made a mistake, but it didn't break the game. We continue with heron's turn
- the non-voters vote yes right now, bringing the current situation in line with what should have happened
- wait for 60 hours to elapse (which would be 5 AM FT on Saturday morning) at which point the non-voters are ineligible and it actually becomes heron's turn. Probably have to call Judgement (and hope the judge rules this way) to make it clear what's going on
I think 3 is the most correct option, which would require Judgement to go back. If anyone thinks we need to use Judgement to sort this out, I certainly won't mind. I do now agree with florrat and Jack Rudd, as I've said. Just a note that we only have 24 hours since I incorrectly ended the turn to call Judgement on that action if we want to - that's later today at 6:45 PM FT.