18826
Variants and Fan Cards / Re: Solving The Big Money Problem
« on: August 10, 2014, 04:10:31 pm »
does anyone here actually think the fact that we play BM from time to time is a problem, or why are we discussing this?
Shouldn't it say, "[You may] put your deck into your discard pile?", like Chancellor/Scavenger, so as to avoid triggering Tunnel? Or is that a feature rather than a bug?
+2$
Look through your discard pile. Put up to two cards from your hand or discard pile aside. Discard them immediately after the next time you shuffle your deck.
+2$
Look through your discard pile. Put two cards from it aside. Discard them immediately after the next time you shuffle your deck.
Hmm, it definitely makes sense for successive games to not be independent. For example, I play against bots, and if I lose a game because I did something stupid, got unlucky, or just made a stupid misclick/interface mistake, I'm much more likely to play poorly the next game. I'm on "tilt" and kind of want to just make up for the previous game. The effect is probably greater than against human components, because you take a lot more time to think things through against real players. (I play kind of speed games against bots.) I'm sure the effect is still there to some degree, though.
Now you can do a runs test and see if there really are streaks.
WS: 143
WL: 54
LS: 42
LL: 86
WD: 4
LD: 1
others:
LB
LB
Crossroads, JackOfAllTrades, Pirate Ship, Spy, Butcher, Embassy, Inn, Rebuild, Goons, Hoard
im gonna hammer.
Yes, absolutely and emphatically. I want to lynch him because he is scum. I've played enough times with ash to know the difference between legitimately crazy ash and "playing crazy" ash. This is the latter. His self-vote, which came off at the first sign of trouble? Scum, absolutely scum move. He also furiously tried to buddy me, and then when that didn't work, reversed his opinion of me.
A lynch of ash is both called for--to punish self-voting and accidental hammer opportunity causers--and most likely to result in a lynch of scum.
Okay... ash has convinced me. I think scum ash would have saved himself by now (by claiming).
zero. but still, three won't be here for the deadline, so that leaves 10. only one (or two) of those have expressed any sort of suspicion towards SP. do you really think it's possible that the other 5 switch to SP out of nowhere?
Not everyone voices all the suspicions they have. And, yes, it is possible. And also, you're not so much in a position to say "it isn't happening".
If you really want Ash to happen, make a good argument for it. It comes off like you're trying to brow beat us into lynching Ash. Which is really scummy, actually
I think I prefer Jimmmm above SP. SP's jumping on Ash's wagon does seem opportunistic, but I don't think he's really been scummy otherwise.
Don't just say "it's not happening". If you think SP is the right lynch, vote and see what happens.
Okay... ash has convinced me. I think scum ash would have saved himself by now (by claiming).
Vote: Teproc
Oh noes, we're partners and you caught us ! Whataver, if ash is lynched and flips scum you can scream for my lynch all you want, in the meantime it's counterproductive to try to identify scumteams (that only becomes useful once one scum has actually flipped.
what a coincidence.Ok well, I will hammer ash for self-preservation in about twenty minutes. I'd rather lynch a townread than me.
20 min have long passed
Well yeah, I explicitely changed my mind. Also, ash has switched so I'm way farther from being lynched.