Looking over various day 1 stuff, and Dent’s contributions pop out.
We'll Vote: Tyler Durden for an RVS L-1.
Apologies for the late arrival, but you'll have to excuse my face.
We still stand by that L-1 vote, it was helpful, it got town talking, finally this game had some momentum. We’re perfectly ok with having sparked some of that.
But then his other head immediately unvotes, having the opposite read that it was simply aggressive play and not mafia-play. Something that’s somewhat interesting here is in between Dent’s vote and unvote, S/U votes for Quirrell because Quirrell called the wagon on lurking Dent RVS. In the post directly above S/U’s vote Harvey Dent called the L-1 vote we gave an RVS L-1, but S/U never mentions this and only focuses on Quirrell’s statement.
Then Dent makes a joke vote on Zaphod for being associated with the Infinite Improbability Drive, and a joke vote on S/U for trying to figure out the identities of Smeagol.
Next vote he casts isn’t a joke, he’s got a serious reason, and (surprise) it’s for Tyler Durden.
Yes, we are in agreement on the posts we make. It's a bad idea to post first, and then argue with your other head. This gives scum the chance to say any "contradictions" were just a disagreement between heads. So our heads are in agreement on the L-1 vote of a lurker and in agreement over the thoughts regarding how fast a lynch can form. There is no cognitive dissonance, our experience with the Harvey Dent vote and the thoughts on Smeagol culminated in the realization of the tendencies of hydra votes.
Huh?
Vote: Tyler Durden
Deliberately creating need of the babelfish to translate from your native language to your native language is an anti-town trait.
vote: Tyler Durden too, for this reason. No one should care that much about how they look.
But here again, he has an interesting interaction with S/U. The post that Dent quotes is from Zaphod, and talks about using a babelfish to translate from native language to native language being anti-town (im not sure what this flavourful analogy means exactly, actually). But it’s
Sakon/Ukon who talked about us caring how we look. So he’s sheeping S/U’s reason, but quotes Zaphod instead.
The other half of Dent immediately unvotes, this is the 2nd time that they’ve almost immediately flipped positions on us. It seems to us like one head is feeling very upset that we put them to L-1, and is trying to find survivalist reasons to lynch us, while the other head is trying really hard to avoid looking like those are just OMGUS votes, which it seems like they are. So far, Dent has made 4 votes, two on Tyler Durden with reasons given, and 2 joke votes on other people. So Dent is pretty hardcore focused on getting us lynched it seems. And then the OMGUSing head revotes Tyler Durden.
Later, closer to the deadline Dent is the first to vote Aggron over lurkiness (after S/U posts the most recent counts), and again the cooler of the two heads unvotes, this time with a joke, possibly to dispel suspicion around this crazy voting pattern.
unvote we're going to get lynched D1 at this rate. Don't be so trigger happy about finding anyone who disagrees with you scummy.
That joke isn’t even accurate. Until reread, we hadn’t found Dent particularly scummy and didn’t disagree with him, and Aggron most certainly wasn’t “disagreeing” with Dent.
Then finally at deadline is the “oh I guess if I haaaave to”-hammer.
vote: aggron if needed
Also,
Many people, including my hothead partner, decided to hammer immediately because well, why not?
I think we should policy lynch a hammerer (yes, even Harvey Dent is up for option here, though I don't think my partner hammered) for lynching without waiting for a claim.
At least one of Dent’s heads most certainly hammered. What exactly is meant by “don't think my partner hammered”? Literally in the same post Dent admits to his partner hammering.
Author
Topic: Mafia XIII: Hydras, Hydras everywhere! Day 1 Started. (Read 66652 times)