I think that's why some of us don't want to talk though.
Is it better for a committee to decide that you get 0 points or only 1 point, or is it better to take your chances?
Actually, I have a proposal for those of us who haven't claimed, although I haven't thought this through all that well.
Jimmmmm, gkrieg13, sudgy, LaLight, pacovf:
What if we take our chances after all, but pledge some kind of a ceiling, or to not use as many points.
Like let's say we all agree to only spend 4 points among the remaining (worse) options. Then those of us who stick by it have more money to work with tomorrow, someone can betray for profit at a cost to their chances tomorrow, but we all still have better odds of winning these low-value targets without spending as much?
Thoughts?