Rereading Swan, without knowing or remembering why others are voting for him. Nothing of note from Day 1.
DatSwan joins joth's argument against raerae. If I understand correctly, the case boils down to 1) raerae put MiX on L-1, claiming it was L-2 and 2) raerae "DEFENDS" shraeye against a MiX vengekill.
I think claiming that she defended him is a stretch. MiX was seemingly emotional and about to make a kneejerk reaction. I also think there's a big difference between wanting to advocate someone's lynch and wanting them to be the second kill of a Day with no extra information, moreso in an RMM.
He also states "There is of course also the narrative where they both could be skum I suppose, but as people have already touched on it, I am not gonna get into it." I'm pretty sure the raerae scum narrative had been touched on as well, so why the need to mention shraeye without commenting?
Nothing else really jumps out at me from Swan. Seems like an okay lynch, and his "I suppose shraeye could be scum" makes him seem a reasonable candidate for a partner of shraeye's.
I quickly looked over the votes for Swan and reread Galz (who I'm a tad suspicious of, but that's work for another day) to find out why he's been voted for, and found very little. Those voting for him - why?
I'm off to bed now. I'll be on for an hour or so before deadline.