~case~
Ok, two points about that
"This probably isn't a scumslip... but it could be!"
Well... yeah. That's, like, obviously true.
I'm picking this out because it's similar to a bunch of things you accuse me of, which boil down to saying that things are kind of gray. And you're making that sound scummy.
But isn't what I said about the slip just obviously true from the PoV of anyone who's town and not skumpy? "It's probably not a slip but it could be" – well, duh. What else could you think about it?
So yeah, I don't think being nuanced is a bad thing.
Two:
"Let's get and EFHW wagon going!..."
"That was a scummy wagon on EFHW. I need to make sure to spin this to other people before it comes back to me for jumping on it with Iguana"
You could easily interpret this in the opposite way. In fact, it seems to me like this is more plausibly interpreted in the opposite way. You're accusing me of being non-commital and throwing suspicion. I voted for EFHW, started a wagon, then changed my mind even though EFHW looked like a plausible lynch at that point. Isn't that the opposite of what you're describing?
The fact that you're pretending like this fits your theory doesn't speak well of the case I think. The strength of a theory is in what it can't predict. If anything I do fits your theory, it has no predictive power. An honest reading of my posts should have realized that what I did with EFHW doesn't actually fit at all.
Also, do you think EFHW is in fact town? Then why did I abandon the lynch? Didn't I put myself in more danger?