I just read through Swowl and Math's D3.
I felt like swowl immediately believed my claim and jumped onto iguana after me. Which one of the biggest reasons someone might unequivocally believe me is because they knew that iguana was, in fact, scum. They also went through and were one of my most ardent defenders all day, and it is easy to defend a position that you know is true (because you are scum).
It seemed like math was just commenting on stuff that happened for activity and then eventually votes for me. I don't know, didn't really feel genuine town read to me, more of a last ditch hope that people would go ahead and exile me rather than iguana.
I didn't go back to D1/D2 to look at how they interact with each other and if it makes sense that they are partners with iguana, but I think just based on D3 I would lean toward exiling math first then swowl next. Definitely see a narrative for an iguana/math/swowl team.
This is very convenient assumptions.
Swowl believed your claim because he "new that iguana was, in fact, scum". Or he believed your claim because when a cop finds a scum, we vote the scum out.
And I "commented on stuff that happened for activity and then eventually vote for you", as a "last ditch hope that people would go ahead and exile you rather than iguana". My reaction to your claim was similar to faust's, in that the way you claimed (timing, vagueness, etc.) was scummy. I did feel (and still do) that if you were a 1-shot cop that found scum, you would have opened the day with that - your role has no further purpose, and you did the maximum you could do... you found scum, and once we vote them out, you are VT. You wouldn't have started with a strong vote on him, keeping things vague, and only when it wasn't quite going as planned, pull out the claim of "I investigated him and found scum". And your reason was "I was considering lying" doesn't cut it for me.
I know in my chum-to-scum, I had you fair high toward chum, because you claimed cop and we did correctly exile iguana (contrary to my beliefs and vote yesterday)... but now that I'm working through this, I've changed my mind.
As far as I can see, you are likely still lying. Maybe you are scum, and did fake claim 1-shot cop, and were hedging initially to see how it would be taken (and how the claims would play out). Or maybe you are a full cop, lied and said 1-shot so you wouldn't seem like a threat anymore (and draw the night kill), and have 2 more investigation results. If you are town, full cop, I don't see what your move is... you obviously have 1 or 2 more town results (1 if scum RB'ed you), but don't want to share them because then it's admitting you lied, and it messes up all our setup discussions... and you don't have a scum result, or you would have told us already, even despite the fact that it would show you were lying.
So 1-shot cop doesn't make sense, based on how you presented results yesterday. Full cop makes very little sense. Scum makes more sense. Kill a partner early, get town-cred for the rest of the game, but it just didn't work out the way you were hoping.