Ok:
just to summarize for myself:
the main points on lio are:
38 posts
- "has a lot of posts that are theory, RVS, jokes or nothing:" I counted #71, 73, 74, 76, 80, 85, 96, 106, 127, 144, 205, 207, 211, 233, 241, 384, 389, 392, 415, 417, 448. so 21/38 posts.
his posts that have good content are: 123, 189, 202, 410, 476, 472. So six posts.
- "he shifts his opinions on sudgy" his initial vote on him was RVS but for what I consider a serious reason (my vote shortly after wasn't RVS, neither was axxle's). He then unvotes once he gets to L-3. Expresses a townread on sudgy/yuma because of our conversation. Maintains his townish read on sudgy. I have to say here that for scum here it would be very tempting to create a scum read on sudgy and put him at l-1, especially when you are the other potential lynch. (there is the cavat that if sudgy and lio are on the same team, it could be an attempt to deflect away from their team, but I continue to maintain that it is too early to try and analyze scumteams w/o anything to go off). So I read that as a town maneuver. So I maintain that this point is invalid. I don't think he has changed his stance on sudgy. In the early game he RVS voted him and since then has only expressed a town read on him.
- "wants to vote for a lurker, but votes for WS instead of a true lurker." At the time, WS was second lowest only to box, as lio mentions. Oh, TA mentioned this as well. So this is an invalid point.
- all of the above was from TA, I couldn't find any other rationale for voting lio by other players except:
- sheeping the IC by nearly everyone
- a sudgy/lio scum team is a possibility from wero
- eevee's vote which only talks about robz and WS.
If there are any other reasons please let me know. Right now I do not think there is enough justification to vote lio. What is being suggested appears to be faulty evidence.
Let's compare to WS
The main points on WS are:
22 posts
Fluff posts: #67, 103, 111, 114, 119, 180, 311, 382, 477 so 9/22. Comparable to lio
Good content posts: # 216, 217, 307, 478, 479, 486. So six posts, slightly higher than lio.
- he has been the main proponent and pusher of the idea of a sudgy/lio scum team. Which is good because if both of these players are town, then it puts the focus on them and not on him and his scumteam.
- he used a false pretense in casting suspicion on lio. The sudgy wagon was not crumbling when lio voted for WS. Like I said before the sudgy wagon was at L-2. If lio had joined it would be at L-1. That isn't a wagon about to fall apart and deflect back to him.
- However, I do believe that his vote on eevee was a deflection. TwistedArcher, you say that you were also going to vote for eevee, but you realized that it would be a lost cause? Well why didn't WS realize the same thing. Maybe because he had realized that someone created a pretty good case on him, realized he was lurking and needed a safe place to make a case and put a vote?
- has been lurking, second most to BoxofDog and when he was called out for lurking he immediately posted a lot! This to me is a classic scum signal. See Grujah in MXI, Lekkit in MXVII and a few other examples. Scum will lurk and then they get called out and be suspicious and then they will start posting a lot in an attempt to say, "Uh-huh, I am posting a lot! See!?"
Neither are slam dunk cases. Day1 cases rarely are. But I think the case against WS has a lot more to it than lio. Furthermore, WS is playing the type of game I expect scum to try and play. Whereas lio isn't. Lio is being the lio I remember from MXIX where he was town, just playing the game. I think lio as scum would be playing differently.
MCMC - I just rememered that you said somewhere that lio could be following some advice that you gave about defending a townie for town points? This is a valid point to an extent, but do you think it is one that you can build a case off? I mean, would town lio be just as likely to defend someone he thought was townie as scum lio? I know I am town, and I am defending lio right now. So does that make me scummy? I think this sort of logic is extremely faulty and is being used backwards.
So quick summary: I think WS is the better lynch. I think sudgy is the better lynch over lio. I think there are other players (eevee, axxle2) who are better lynches than lio. I won't criticize TA for his case. It was well built, but does have some holes in it. But what is more concerning is that everyone else that has voted for lio has done so based off sheeping or for reasons that dont' make much sense at all. This looks like a classic day1 mislynch.