As a reminder:
here is the case on Archetype that I made Wednesday, and I would like to point out that archetype has not responded to it in any way at all since that time.
Alright, the case on Archetype:
the sparky era:
37 posts
- first 11 posts are all RVS and theory talk (fair enough, it is early).
- calls ashersky's style annoying, says I am hard to read, calls out insomniac for not posting much
- 6 more theory/fluff posts
- would vote insomniac, but hesitant because he has so many votes, at that point he had 4.
- calls out kooshie for a scum slip; first time mentioning kooshie, says the case is worth a reread (at this point kooshie is at 4 votes I think (note that here is the time when I mention that scum would and should at least note a scum partner. The wagon is growing, they need to either start to defend or getting in line to buss if it comes to that... this is exactly what sparky was doing. And exactly what I didn't do at the same time, because I wasn't worried about a scummate!)
- asks kooshie some questions, more suspicious
- puts support behind lynch, still doesn't vote
- asks mcmc for his thoughts on mail-mi, expresses a scum read, perhaps considering getting an alternate wagon going to deflect from kooshie?
- eevee calls out kooshie for being scummy saying, "sparky's general attitude towards the impending kooshie lynch seem scummy to me. Looks like he is looking for a safe way to get this lynch through."
- sparky responds saying he wouldn't put someone to L-1 w/o a consensus. This screams to me of scum trying to play it safe; being willing to join in on a buss, but not wanting to do so.
- says it is because he learned to be cautious from playing scum a lot.
day2:
- inclined to look on wagon for bussers
- says xeiron swiped his vote
- townie read on lio
- scummy read on insmoniac, reiterates his reason for not putting kooshie to l-1.
- some more talk about the kooshie wagon and insomniac
- says he can be easily frustrated as scum
The archetype era:
18 posts:
day 2:
- first four posts are promising a reread, (fair he is just coming in and that day2 was starting to get dense)
- big points from his reread are: map claim is bad (theory), town reads on (ash, raerae, Ozle) scum reads on (jimmm, jorbles and mail-mi). But his reasons are... flawed. his reason for ash is "not sure why." go see for yourselves, after a reread, he doesn't give much.
- quotes cases on jimmmm "saying" This, but then says he isn't sold on the Jimmmm case
- explains why he has a scum read on Jimmm further and explains some things that he said incorrectly
- backs off his scum read on Jimmm pretty significantly, ends up voting for mail-mi for basically being "sheepy"
- again talking about mail-mi, but doesn't really say why
- talks about a soft deadline
- reverts back to a Jimmm vote, again quite a change from where he was previously
- calls hedging a scum tell (lio)
- back to mail-mi again, says we should analyze jimmm today (has archetype done that... I am going to guess no...)
- end of day interaction with mail-mi
Day3
- opens up with a ? Lekkit vote? I am pretty sure that came out of no where. He had never mentioned Lekkit before. But! in the post above Jorbles posts a vote for archetype, within it is a list of scumminess that Jorbles makes that says "raerae, Insomniac, Archetype and especially Lekkit... especially Lekkit. Made an unacceptably small contribution to discussion yesterday. d2 was really long and they made 7 posts or less. That combined with my previous wagon analysis makes me vote: Archetype." So archetype see this vote on him, goes AH! reads that Jorbles has a scum read on Lekkit, and decides to deflect. Also says that Jorbles and Lekkit are his prefered lynches for today. What happened to Jimmm, Archetype?
- I post a case on him on how I think the above is deflecting. He never responds.
- says he is VLA. Something I didn't know about, but I'll take his word for it.
In summary:
- heavy lurker. Definitely toward the bottom in terms of both posts and content.
- easily could have been setting up a potential buss day1 on kooshie, but was too hesitant.
- reacted to the beginning of a wagon on a scumbuddy exactly how I would expect scum to react.
- reads that looked very artificial,
- changing reads on jimmm, not following through on jimmmm today
- his deflection vote on lekkit that came out of no where.
add in his non-participation today (some of it was V/LA yes) and his inability to respond to the case above.
I can't really explain the sparky part because I'm not him, but I can talk about some things in you 'in summary' section:
Generally I do lurk, yes. I'm not going to try and spin this to a lurking Arch=town!Arch debate, because that's not true. I lurk as both town and scum. You've played enough games with me, Yuma, and you know my meta so I'm wondering why this is new to you.
I don't really care if you think my reads are artificial. They're my reads that I choose to share with people, no matter how translucent they may appear at a glance.
The Lekkit vote wasn't strictly deflecting. I did a brief reread on him when it was night and found him VERY scummy, so that's why I opened with a vote on him. I would have elaborated more then, but I had just started my V/LA.
Overall, I don't mind too much if you lynch me (just don't quick hammer), but be wary of Yuma leading Town. That guy is a master scum player.
Author
Topic: Mafia XXII: Bankers Beware -- GAME OVER, SCUM WIN (Read 224137 times)