I smell a conspiracy. I have a feeling that scum are controlling this game a lot more the people seem to be giving them credit for. Let's look at the Kooshie lynch:
Vote Count 1.11
mail-mi (1) -- mcmcsalot
liopoil (1) -- yuma
raerae (1) -- Jimm
Kooshie (9) -- liopoil, Eevee, Jorbles, sudgy, Lekkit, mail-mi, ashersky, raerae, xeiron
sudgy (1) -- Insomniac
Eevee (1) -- Ozle
Not Voting (2) -- sparky5856, Kooshie
We all know that easy lynches are usually Town, but this seems to have been one. Where was the opposition to this lynch? Where was the scum-driven alternative?
What were the other three scum doing while Kooshie was getting herself lynched? There were no other significant wagons. Looking at the vote counts, a few people got to three votes at different times, but as far as I can tell there was never a viable alternative to the Kooshie lynch, and at day's end,
no one else had more than one vote. So all three of the other scum were either contributing to the lynch or sitting idly by letting it happen and allowing themselves to be among the "off-wagoners". If you read Kooshie,
she didn't even argue particularly strongly against her lynch.
Now think about a four-person scumteam. There's no SK or other team, so all four of them must be lynched or otherwise killed by Town for them to lose. They have some room to take risks. So what do they discuss before the game? "Let's bus Day 1. Town will be so thrilled about hitting scum so early that we can line up all the people off the wagon and take them out one by one." Trading one of the team of four for Towncred would sound a good deal to me.
So let's not automatically assume that we should lynch off-wagon. Instead, consider that scum might actually be playing this game to win rather than sitting on the sidelines letting things happen. I will eat WinterSpartan's hat if there wasn't scum on the Kooshie wagon, and I wouldn't be surprised if there were two or three of them. And being called crazy for that doesn't change my mind in the slightest.