Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 ... 101 102 [103] 104 105 ... 125  All

Author Topic: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 7)  (Read 312049 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2550 on: February 18, 2013, 10:12:24 am »

oh hey, I'm not dead! :D

I feel the scum is either yuma or robz. Here's why I don't think it's Jimmmm:

if Jimmmmm is scum yuma is town. If yuma is town then he was roleblocked/jailed. If he was roleblocked/jailed it was by scum. If scum roleblocked/jailed yuma and Jimmmmm is scum then Jimmmmm jailed/roleblocked Yuma. This means that if jimmmmm is scum he is a roleblocker/jailkeeper. this means that he decided to breadcrumb PR/beloved princess early D1, and needlessly added that Joth gave him another power when he claimed. I don't think that Jimmmmm would do this. I also think it very unlikely that we are going to lynch Jimmmmm this game. For that to happen we would have to come up with an actual case on him that is better than the huge cases on Yuma and Robz888, plus the reasons to believe he is town above, and yuma, robz and I all agree on it. Since I don't think we are going to lynch Jimmmmm, this means that he essentially wins if he is scum. Therefore I think we should treat him as an IC. Yuma or Robz, did I miss something? do we have a good reason to consider lynching Jimmmmm?

Do we want to consider No lynching? assuming we aren't lynching Jimmmmm, all it would do is kill off an IC, making it so that one of Jimmmmm or I pretty much decide the game. right now Jimmmmm and I need to agree on who to lynch, which I think is probably best, assuming Jimmmmm is town.

If we aren't going to No lynch then I think Jimmmmm should Fullclaim (how many shots, who he's saved, etc.). this is because if we don't No lynch then the game is going to be decided today, and any shots he might have left are useless. If we were going to No lynch he should probably Full claim anyway...
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2551 on: February 18, 2013, 10:22:21 am »

I thought of no lynching, and normally with 1 scum 3 Town that'd be the way to go. But we have an IC so I don't think there's much point. Also, either way we need everyone but the lynchee to agree to get a lynch through.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2552 on: February 18, 2013, 10:25:04 am »

I need to do a giant reread. I read your post lio and overall I agree with it about jimmmm but I do want to make sure about it and make sure all the bases are covered before giving him that status.

I am pretty much vla today but will be getting to everything soon.
Logged

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2553 on: February 18, 2013, 10:34:04 am »

yeah, I think the whole idea of No lynching is to rule out a suspect. So, Jimmmmmm, fullclaim!
Logged

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2554 on: February 18, 2013, 10:35:08 am »

just thought of something. If Jimmmmm and I do our big reread and stuff of robz and yuma and dissagree about who to lynch we may be forced to No lynch, in which case scum has an interesting choice...
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2555 on: February 18, 2013, 10:36:10 am »

Very little time right now to post. Will have more later. But a few quick thoughts:

Don't give Jim obv town status please. Lets take our time and think through the possibility that he could be scum. I don't think it's likely though just because I don't think there's another scum role blocker, which would have to be the case for jim to be scum instead of Yuma.

We are I assume looking for another maquis. That's why he shot the maquis cop instead of the IC.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2556 on: February 18, 2013, 10:37:14 am »

I was a 1-shot Doctor which I used Night 1 on theorel because I thought I was going to be Nightkilled. I hoped the possibility of having a Doctor around might mess up scum kills and maybe make them not want to kill the Cops because they might be protected.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2557 on: February 18, 2013, 10:42:39 am »

Why theorel instead of someone else? obviously that was a good choice, but at that point he hadn't claimed or anything.

I don't think it is neccessarily maquis. yes I think it is more likely that there is maquis than MU, but is by no means certain. It's more likely that there's an MU than Jimmmmm being scum I think. scum might have killed ash because he thought Jimmmmm might save me. ashersky would likely target jimmmmm, and the scum in yuma/robz wouldn't want him to be an IC.
Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2558 on: February 18, 2013, 10:48:04 am »

Why theorel instead of someone else? obviously that was a good choice, but at that point he hadn't claimed or anything.

My biggest Townread at that stage was obviously Dsell. I actually thought he might have known my role (on the Beloved Princess wiki page it says that often the game comes with something that makes it such that Town deserves to be punished if they lynch the BP, and one example of this was a "Guard" who knew who the BP was). But I thought that Dsell had so much Towncred that he was unlikely to be killed by either team, for the possibility of Doctors or clashing with the other team. I figured a good place to go would be the second Towniest person, and for me that was theorel.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 2)
« Reply #2559 on: February 18, 2013, 11:19:32 am »

I re-read yuma, paying particular attention to interactions with Glooble and Munch. The take-home message is that yuma tunnelled Glooble big-time. In isolation, that would make me lean towards yuma not being on Glooble's team. If he is, then major bussing to the extent of actively trying to get Glooble lynched was yuma's plan, seemingly from close to the start.

The following players have received votes:

...

themunch/sparky - themunch's reaction to Eevee's vote is interesting because it is meta based. Which I suppose is appropriate because eevee's case is rather meta based. Along with however was a defense of Eevee's vote on him in response to ash. I feel like this could be buddying, but is so obvious that I don't want to think that it is. What was it you say about obvious play Robz?

now that is the sort of Day 1 case that I understand and can get behind. It isn't trying to make something out of nothing. (well it is because it is making a case out of lack of posts, but you know what I mean...) vote: glooble

Trying to do better than LaLL is sort of what led to D1 in casino game. I don't mean there was an obvious lurker lynch there, but from my perspective it seemed like town was dying to find airtight cases and be stubborn about who they would refuse to vote for or refuse to give up a case on. By the end of the day everyone had a wagon on them, reads were muddled, town mislynched shraeye at town!Robz's insistence after like 60 pages and behavior was hard to analyze on D2.

I guess my point is that LaLL is at least as good as any other reasoning D1. At least once there's been some degree of healthy discussion as there has been here.

Does anyone else have the feeling that town does better when they kinda just get D1 over with kinda quickly even if they mislynch?

this is how I feel. I don't know if rushed is the right way to put it... and town doesn't always tend to do well when it has an obvious day1 lynch... MXII for example in pps...

But really to say that voting Glooble isn't enough is kinda silly, because it is something real and provable. Whereas the other cases, while some have more merit than others, are based off interpretation, metas and (day 1 more often than not) misunderstandings. These cases have a role, but they shouldn't be counted higher than other day1 methods.

blah... well I am kinda disappointed in the reaction to glooble's reaction. It was just too easy.... I personally want to hear more from Glooble

This is interesting since if yuma is Maquis then it involves the whole Maquis team:

What struck me as the most odd from the Glooble wagon is this post from Yuma:
now that is the sort of Day 1 case that I understand and can get behind. It isn't trying to make something out of nothing. (well it is because it is making a case out of lack of posts, but you know what I mean...) vote: glooble
I dont know what to make of it yet but I dont like it.

let me know when you figure it out and I'll respond to it if necessary. For now I will acknowledge that you think it is... something... and leave it at that.

Question.  Did you actually mean "case"?  And if yes, what case are you referring to?

Yes I meant case. As in the case on Glooble is that he is lurking and lurking in a somewhat scummy manner. This is contrasted to early cases that I had criticized that I thought were trying to be bigger and more important than they really should have been.

And I still say that glooble is a valid lynch option that was abandoned far too quickly. In fact it wasn't even given a chance to produce the real results that I was looking for... to see if Glooble would start posting more under pressure--there now I gave away my scum hunting trick--like Lekkit and Grujah did when we lynched them. But all he had to do was post twice and the pressure was off, just like that. What was that all about?

just found this quote from Glooble:

Quote
I have fairly strong townreads on Galz and shraeye at the moment (and obviously myself.) Of course, if you (this is refering to Cuzz) flip town, I will be suspicious of them. But first we need to see a flip."

after Cuzz was lynched, but before thread lock and flip...

This is interesting. (because I am more interested in finding Galz's partner, I am paying more attention to the galz part of this, but the fact that Glooble included shraeye in this is interesting)

1. Assuming here that Glooble is scum and on the scum team with Galz.
2. Neither Glooble nor Galz would know what the alignment of Cuzz was--he very well could have been opposing scum.
3. Glooble expresses a town read on Galz if Cuzz flips scum, but a potential scum read on Galz if Cuzz flips scum.
4. This is a win/win for Glooble!partner with Galz. Because if Cuzz is scum, he can now safely have a town read on his partner that won't be especially scrutinized. But if Cuzz is town, he can start a bussread on his partner, again w/o much scrutiny...

So I guess the question is this: would scum!Glooble express a strong town read on his partner? Now I guess he is actually expressing more of a scum read than a town read. Because from scum!Glooble's perspective, Cuzz was more likely to flip town--as scum!Glooble would know that Cuzz wasn't on a scum team with him, so even though he didn't know Cuzz's alignment, he suspected that Cuzz was perhaps more likely to flip town, so his read while potentially strong town was actually more setup to be a scum read...

I think Galzparner!Glooble could write something like this.

Yuma, I don't understand your argument for why I'm Galz's scumbuddy at all.

is there anything in particular you don't understand? Let me see if I can clarify a bit.

I am not saying that you are Galz's scumbuddy. I don't know if you are or not. I analyzed Galz's interactions with everyone, and you were one person that stood out to me that could potentially be his scumbuddy. I then looked back a bit and saw your post about Galz. From there I tried to see if your post would make sense from a player that could be scumbuddy with Galz. I think it does. It doesn't mean that you are, but it means that that post doesn't exclude you from being... Does that make sense?  Does that make sense to everyone?

I am not saying that Glooble is Galz's scum partner. I need to go back and look at things more and try and look at other players as well before I make that decision. But that post did jump out to me and could certainly be from scum!Glooble about his partner Galz.

I am much more comfortable in thinking that there is scum within the three of mcmc/Jimmm/shraeye then I am in thinking that there is scum in raerae/shraeye/munch. Galz's trio actually has something of substance to base it off. It isn't surefire, but it is a lot better than raerae/shraeye/munch... But again has the same danger... For example: say if we lynch mcmc and say town!Jimmmm dies in the night that doesn't guarantee shraeye is scum... and could easily result in 2 mislynches before we finally realize that there wasn't scum in the mix... But I do think it is a better bet than heading down the other route.

TheMunch: talks to raerae about the lack of theory conversation.... puts a vote down on eevee (the one that shraeye criticized)... has an "off read" on ash... says "raerae is raerae" theorizes she could be sk... and doesn't think shraeye was worth mentioning at this point... admits feeling not as confident after the switch mafia... finds shraeye's case on Cuzz as "meh" but feels that Cuzz's response was worth a vote... agrees with 100% on shraeye's read on glooble, expresses a dislike for the long day1... doesn't like an eevee POE suspicion on raerae... really pushes for the Cuzz lynch, like hard... has a strong town read on shraeye in response to Cuzz....

...

So I don't think there is any greater chance of finding scum between shraeye and themunch than any other two players. I think this has been a road of faulty logic that we as town have gone down. Now the question is such: who is more likely to create this type of myth? Town or scum?

Robz is probably my number one townread, so his endorsement of the shraeye lynch definitely holds weight with me. But something still seems off to me. Sorry I can't offer anything more constructive right now.

why is he a town read?

I think right now I am leaning toward an mcmc vote or a glooble vote... Although I first want to have glooble answer some outstanding questions and I am curious about Robz's extra information that he is withholding...

Now Glooble:

finds Jimmm scummy and as a result the eevee case not very compelling.... and then votes Jimmm for both the eevee case and the PR claim thing.... votes ashersky, because ash asked why he didn't vote him when glooble called out a defense by ash...

I will note that glooble has a lot of posts, or part of posts that reference his availability or lack thereof... I know scum can become paranoid about how town views their availability in regard to their posting... or it could just be that glooble knows that he is a lurker and is a nice guy and wants to acknowledge that and let us know why...

under a bit of pressure for lurking reveals that he was going to /out of the game... Now as I said before this irked me... well not glooble's response, because I am not one to purposefully question someones IRL obligations and responsibilities... but I was irked that this resonated so quickly with nearly everyone on his wagon. I mentioned before the glooble wagon started that I was interested in reactions and in analyzing reactions... I was particularily interested in glooble's reaction to a wagon on him, but I was more interested in it in the long term... With both the day1 scum/lurker lynches we had in the past the thing that set them up wasn't really their lurking, it was that they both subsequently started to increase the amount of posts after the pressure. I was hoping to see if Glooble would do that, but the immediate let off on pressure didn't really give me a chance. I guess I can analyze it a bit... in that since then glooble has not increased the amounts of posting (sorry for the long tangent there, but I was really hoping that line of thought would pay off and you would all think me a genius and crown me mafia champion...)

similar to mcmc, glooble unvotes ash because it was an ancient read...  Glooble starts the investigation into cuzz for his "redirect to glooble" actually shraeye brings it up, but Glooble agrees with and a lot of the rest of the case, and eventually votes for Cuzz... defends some of the points from shraeye's case against theorel's analysis...

Again the post I mentioned before where glooble has a strong town read on Galz and shraeye if Cuzz flips scum, but reverse that if Cuzz flips town... (this still is really scummy to me, especially in light of Galz's alignment

and then is absent for the rest of day 1.

Day 2;

still has a townread on shraeye... But Cuzz flipped town!!! in contradiction to that posted above and wanted to analyze the fast wagon on shraeye... gives some merit to munch's case on ash... is undecided/leaning no in answer to scum between munch/shraeye

well my beef with glooble is as such:

1. lurking, but didn't change lurking habits after receiving pressure, but pressure wasnt' there very long
2. has a lot of availability posts, but like I said... could be paranoid scum or just a nice guy... has glooble done this in the past, tell us his availability a lot, I haven't played much with him.
3. was on the Cuzz wagon, and heavily agreed with shraeye and defended some of shraeye's points (this isn't necessarily scummy, but I disagreed with the case and the defenses)
4. his post about Galz/shraeye in light of the cuzz flip and the fact that he still has a town read on shraeye despite that.

And I can't remember again what Galz had to say about him... Galz said he would be willing to lynch him, but didn't really have a scum read.

So at this point I have a scummier read on mcmc than on Glooble. All of my thoughts on Glooble seem to have a this was scummy, but.... attached onto it.

I can't believe how quickly this deadline is coming up. I see some merit on each of the wagons though I really wish others were interested in lynching Munch. I will review and get in some more content soon...ish.

is there any particular reason we should be focusing on TheMunch that you would like to point out for us. If you really wish for something to happen, perhaps you could do something to make it happen? I don't know. Themunch is somewhere in the middle of the pack for me, but if you put something together I would certainly be willing to look at it. But again, I am leaning more toward mcmc or glooble than anyone else. Although I also think lio could take an extra look as well.

So I am going to go back to my second scumread and vote: glooble. It appears that everyone is reverting back to shraeye, who I could see lynching, but not as much as I would prefer glooble. Also, and this is secondary to my scumread on glooble, but I am worried that with such a short deadline people are going to start jumping on shraeye because "he is the only viable lynch possible" and we will end up in a similar situation as we did yesterday with the Cuzz wagon...

sorry:

vote: glooble

But I am happy that someone else is finally acknowledging Glooble. I am much more in support of his lynch over ashersky or lio (who I reread yesterday and did not find to be exceptionally scummy at all!)

vote: Glooble

Well, I will have to think more about that.... But beyond that I think there is likely scum 1. within the Cuzz wagon (Glooble, ash, Robz, TheMunch, lio); and 2. people on only 1 wagon (mcmc, theorel, Glooble), although here theorel could be considered to be on the 1shraeye wagon and being willing to hammer eevee. and look at that Glooble is on both.

However, I also felt like there was some buddying from liopoil towards Glooble (didn't notice it the other way).  Here are a couple posts that stood out...here and here.  But on reread I may have read too much into this, as there were only a couple other interactions which seemed less buddying on reread.  But, it did stand out as odd to me, especially because for a lot of that, most the rest of his attention seemed focused on Jimmmmm's claim-thing.  I mean he has the one post of an everyone-read, but other than that he's casting suspicions on Jimmmmm and buddying Glooble.

Based on that alone, I'd rather lynch liopoil.  But I need to look back at a couple other things also: who voted for liopoil yesterday?  Who has expressed interest in lynching Glooble today?  Those are important things to be considered in all of this.  For now, I'm going to Vote: liopoil and see where things go.

I hadn't noticed those posts in regard to Glooble, or perhaps I noticed them because I remembered them but didn't see their significance... and to be honest I still kinda don't. I think that part of this is that I have a pretty strong scum read on Glooble, whereas you have a town read on Glooble. And for that reason I find it hard--although I do need to remember that there is more than one scum team--to see a player buddying up to scum. Normally it is a scum buddying up to town.

I would also say that he has had some "buddying" like posts with other players as well... He really liked shraeye's analysis. He just gave me townie points a few posts up, he and themunch are apparently like this.... (imagine two of my fingers crossed together)...  and I am sure there are more out there... so I am not sure what your point is with Glooble specifically. Lio seems like he likes to compliment other players for their work and their reads. Maybe this is scummy, but it is kinda hard to tell w/o meta analysis.

My previous read on lio (from late day2) changed a gut scum read into a non-scum read. I still lean toward town on him.

I am kinda waiting for people to finish up rereads on Glooble... There are a couple that are supposedly in progress or waiting to be done.

I'll respond to your posts, but I am not super inclined to have a huge back and forth like Day1 saw as those tend to monopolize the discussion and really to me aren't very readable. But I do want to make sure you understand me and that I understand you.

1. Yes, lurking alone isn't enough. I agree, which if that were all, it wouldn't be enough.

2. This was resolved after you later explained your rationale for why you do it. I don't think it is scummy, I think it is polite and shouldn't be considered as part of my current case on you. Previously it was something that I found interesting during my reread of you and wanted to hear more from you about.

3. the Cuzz wagon isn't just the way that you participated, it was the way that you participated. You added little original thought to it. I know this isn't a super great argument because shraeye did put together a pretty large case that left little room for original thought. But it was as if you basically followed shraeye using him as a shield if things went wrong. This is in contrast to others such as ashersky and Robz who did add their own insights into the Cuzz case. I think this is exemplified by your post that I quoted that said you would find--and from this I read that you would expect others to find shraeye scummy if Cuzz turned up scum.

4. Again point 4 was from the point of view when shraeye was still alive and shraeye's alignment wasn't known. But again the issue is what I address in point 3 and will address below.

My thought process behind the one out of three being scum from the group that was only on one wagon is that I think scum often likes to not be on a lot of wagons. They kind of like to vote sparingly, try to stay out of the limelight, avoid wagons... At least in my experience at least one member of scum tends to do that... so you three kinda fit the bill. But you are correct that the eevee wagon started more or less while you were gone... I hadn't realized that. You did express a townread on him shortly before it started... so this analysis is a little more muddled (and I guess you weren't really online during the shraeye quick wagon day1 either...)

As for the last point... I know my quote is convuluted and isn't really clear, I was just thinking out loud. I will try to be more clear here.... What I am thinking behind that post really had more to do with Galz than with shraeye.

Here is the quote again for context:

Quote
I have fairly strong townreads on Galz and shraeye at the moment (and obviously myself.) Of course, if you flip town, I will be suspicious of them. But first we need to see a flip.

This was posted after the lynch, but before the flip and I find it an interesting post because if you posted it as scum partners with Galz it is a win/win scenario for you. If Cuzz flips scum, you are totally justified in having a town read on your partner Galz. However, if Cuzz flips town, you are then totally justified in having a scum read on your partner Galz, who is likely to come under some pressure Day2, for some easy, suspicion free, bussing. Again, this isn't so much evidence against you as it is me wanting to make sure that the person I am voting for has a viable chance of being partners with Galz--as I think analyzing him and his interactions with other players presents our best chance at finding scum at this point. I found this post of yours to be a viable post from scum!glooble who is partners with Galz.

And there was a typo in the post below, where it says you had a non-genuine defense of eevee, it should be a non-genuine defense of shraeye. This corresponds to point 3 above.

I understand that while you said you would be more suspicious of shraeye if Cuzz flipped town, that doesn't necessarily mean that you would read him as surefire scum afterward, but you dont' even seem to change your read on him. It was kind of like you picked in the early game which players you would have town reads on and stuck with them the rest of the game.

for example this line in particular stood out to me:
Quote
The fact is, I'm far from ready to lynch shraeye with the info we have now. It's like, it seems good on paper, but he just reads very town to me. But maybe part of that is that if I admit that his arguments for lynching Cuzz were manipulative, then I'm owning up to how easy I was to manipulate.
is talking more about yourself than shraeye.

I am also going to throw out one more thing I just noticed... the promises to do things, but not doing them. you were going to look at the shraeye, quick wagon, you were going to look at me, you were going to put together a "willing to lynch" list... and so on. I think that tends to be a scum trait. Because putting together that kind of work and reads and making them look real can be really difficult as scum.

That ended up being longer than I wanted, sorry. What do other people think. Does my case hold water? Am I just tunneling. I don't feel like I am.

I am confident one of the two of Mcmc/Ash is scum though.

If he flips town... I was just thinking about that as I was writing my last post... The point of the case on Robz is that scumRobz is definitely capablle of throwing down strong town reads on his partners.  If hes town I dont think that effects my read on either Ash or Mcmc.  This is not the first time I've run into a situation where I am forced to choose between clever-scum-robz and bad-play-town-robz.

I'm sorry but I just don't understand this post in the context of your vote on Robz... I mean I could see you voting Robz if we were getting close to lynch deadline and he was a viable wagon and we needed to get a lynch through. But right now? With other options available, including one of the people you are "confident is scum", voting Robz doesn't make sense to me.... I guess what is the point of trying to get Robz lynched if you think scum is elsewhere? Am I missing something?

Big things that struck out to me was Jimmmm diminishing posts (I mean just about everyone is diminishing in posts (partially because the day is not yet over), but he has dramatically decreased as the days have gone by. Glooble is similar, but on a smaller scale because he posts less. And Dsell actually is about up to speed % wise, but lagging far far behind in total. Whereas Robz and ash aren't quite up to speed % wise, but still have a greater than average total posts in all days.

So big take away FOS: Jimmmm and Glooble (hey look I am already voting there) as I continue to think that it becomes increasingly harder for scum to writer posts, especially posts that are meaningful and not likely to create suspicion, as the game goes on.

We've got just under a week to deadline, and yuma's working to derail our only promising lynch.

Odds that Glooble actually provides any content now that the pressure is lifting?  Close to nil.

Big FOS yuma for his 180 after Glooble commits to providing a response but before we are able to see if he actually comes through.  Glooble's just been given permission to continue not to worry.

I don't get this... We have a week. That is as in a whole week, not only a week. It isn't like we are in crunch time here.

Second, I am not derailing anything. I am trying to lynch scum. I don't know if glooble is scum. I think he is likely scum, but I am not sure if he is more likely scum than Jimmm, that is what I am trying to find out.

Third, Glooble isn't our only promising lynch. That sort of mindset is exactly what got Cuzz lynched Day1 and has been the bane of this game so far. People get deadset on their bad reads, stick to them, dont' look at anyone else and then we lynch town! Ugh!

Fourth, Glooble already responded to me and as I said in the post I above I still expect Glooble to provide content. If he doesn't, well... like I said, I have no problem going back to him.

Glooble should still worry if he is town. He should worry about a mislynch. If he is scum... well then. I don't care... he can just not post and we will lynch him.

But I do really want to take a look at Jimmmm. Do you agree that his downward trend in posting is scummy?

it looks like only dsell and ash think my case on Jimmmm has any merit at all. I still want to hear from themunch about it... I would assume that Glooble would think it has more merit than the case on him, but I don't really trust him at this point regardless...

As for lio. I have reread him... multiple times in fact. And I just don't think that the compelling case is there for him the same way that it is for Glooble or Jimmmm. The only things that anyone has really said about lio is that he has sheeped some votes and had some weird buddy interaction with Glooble. Is there anything we should look at in particular Robz?

I will revert back to vote: glooble as it appears votes on Jimmmm won't be forthcoming. Glooble remains a strong scum read and I support his lynch, but still think Jimmmm is a strong candidate as well.

pretty sure that is L-2 for glooble FYI

So yeah.  Before I back my vote off Ash/Mcmc/Robz I feel like I need someone to set me straight on the actual events of the last few pages.  My lack of participation is hurting me and my reads I feel.

Do you have anything specific that you want addressed? I mean the posts back there probably speak more clearly than I could attempt in a summary, unless some of the posts themselves are confusing?

If you have any specific questions I would be happy to answer them, but if you just want a generalization of what happened, I would just suggest rereading the posts again... because that is exactly what I would be doing in trying to explain to the events of the last few days...


So yuma's insistence on lynching Glooble seem to make it unlikely that they are together on a team. On the other hand, maybe you can take it as yuma trying too hard to bus and distance himself from his partner. Seems a tad unlikely. But then it looks like we're going to have to choose between seemingly unlikely scenarios, so I don't know.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2560 on: February 18, 2013, 11:24:51 am »

I don't think it is neccessarily maquis. yes I think it is more likely that there is maquis than MU, but is by no means certain. It's more likely that there's an MU than Jimmmmm being scum I think. scum might have killed ash because he thought Jimmmmm might save me. ashersky would likely target jimmmmm, and the scum in yuma/robz wouldn't want him to be an IC.

Liopoil, you're not thinking this through. If scum thought there was any chance Jimm still had a shot, scum would have shot Jimm. Whoever he is, he couldn't afford a no-kill night.

But what he really couldn't afford was ash surviving and investigating. He has a one third chance of ash investigating him. And even if ash investigated one of the two others, it narrows down ash's guessing to 50%. Not shooting ash is just like way too dangerous for a maquis.

Now, for an MU, shooting ash is the WRONG call, because ash could be an MU! You want to leave as many possible MUs alive, and ash was never cleared of this. So you want to shoot either liopoil, the IC, or Jimm, who cannot actually be an MU (he was cleared by theorel). If you're really afraid of Jimm doctoring, just shoot Jimm. He can't doctor himself.

Shooting ash is the strictly best move for maquis. Really, it's the necessary move for maquis.

Shooting jimm or liopoil is the strictly best move for MU. Shooting ash doesn't necessarily hurt you though, I guess. But it limits the number of suspects for the town to decide between.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2561 on: February 18, 2013, 11:29:53 am »

Also saw this. Might be nothing though, but possible scumslip?

... whether or not they are members of "station" or "marquies"

yuma seems to be saying that players are either Station or Maquis, a belief that surely only be come to by a member of the Maquis, since anyone else seeing Maquis would see MU and Changeling right next to them. So maybe yuma was under the impression that Maquis was the only scumteam? Possibly backed up by this:

3. theorel however, brings up an interesting point about eevee and one that can be extrapolated to everyone in that scum metas aren't going to be either "town" or "scum." But this is compelling specifically about eevee. I guess I am hesitant, however, to establish this idea until it is confirmed--through night kills, lynches, investigations, that we have multiple scum teams. I am not saying I won't lynch eevee until this can be proved, but I am hesitant to use this philosophy as part of a rationale for voting.

yuma here seems to be saying "Maybe we have only one scumteam, so maybe standard scumtells do apply". Which backs up the notion that maybe yuma was getting his idea of what scum was from his own scum experience rather than from the OP.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2562 on: February 18, 2013, 11:32:59 am »

Also saw this. Might be nothing though, but possible scumslip?

... whether or not they are members of "station" or "marquies"

yuma seems to be saying that players are either Station or Maquis, a belief that surely only be come to by a member of the Maquis, since anyone else seeing Maquis would see MU and Changeling right next to them. So maybe yuma was under the impression that Maquis was the only scumteam? Possibly backed up by this:

3. theorel however, brings up an interesting point about eevee and one that can be extrapolated to everyone in that scum metas aren't going to be either "town" or "scum." But this is compelling specifically about eevee. I guess I am hesitant, however, to establish this idea until it is confirmed--through night kills, lynches, investigations, that we have multiple scum teams. I am not saying I won't lynch eevee until this can be proved, but I am hesitant to use this philosophy as part of a rationale for voting.

yuma here seems to be saying "Maybe we have only one scumteam, so maybe standard scumtells do apply". Which backs up the notion that maybe yuma was getting his idea of what scum was from his own scum experience rather than from the OP.

The second thing, no. I think he just means, whether we are dealing with 2 teams, or a team and an SK.

But the first thing, man. That actually does look fairly bad, even when you click the post for the full context.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2563 on: February 18, 2013, 11:37:42 am »

The second thing, no. I think he just means, whether we are dealing with 2 teams, or a team and an SK.

Yeah I thought of that. I think the issue was whether or not scum can genuinely scumhunt, which in this setup they can, especially on day 1. Even if there is a SK, the other scumteam doesn't know there's a SK.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2564 on: February 18, 2013, 10:17:01 pm »

Also saw this. Might be nothing though, but possible scumslip?

... whether or not they are members of "station" or "marquies"

yuma seems to be saying that players are either Station or Maquis, a belief that surely only be come to by a member of the Maquis, since anyone else seeing Maquis would see MU and Changeling right next to them. So maybe yuma was under the impression that Maquis was the only scumteam? Possibly backed up by this:

that is obviously not what I am saying. For this to be true it would require me to be a complete idiot and to not realize that there are multiple scum teams. Something that was fully discussed day1 and in the opening thread.

It is funny because the post you quote was in response to another supposed "scum-slip" by me. To that I will quote Cuzz to what he said to the possibility of that.

I will policy vote the next person who accuses someone of a scumslip.
Logged

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2565 on: February 18, 2013, 10:31:29 pm »

So let's start with Jimmmm:

my main case on Jimmmm was on day3... this was the summary:

Quote
1. lots of interaction with galz. especially defensively or pro-actively before suspicion is given. Trying to lead town in a direction to find scum that wouldn't implicate himself after Galz is NK... Town reads on Galz throughout day1 for really no reason.
2. the weird day1 claiming thing. Setting up a very obvious breadcrumb. I have often said before that town shouldn't need to breadcrumb and I think it isn't a very pro-town thing to do and is more of a scum trait than anything else. Scum thinks no one will believe their claim. Town can't believe it when no one believes their claim. so scum sets up the breadcrumb. Town is just incredulous when they are lynched
3. the eevee case was kinda weird, especially all the jokes in the middle. Joking isn't necessarily a scum trait, but I do wonder if Jimmm was trying not to push too hard? I don't know how good of a point this is, but I will include it for completeness' sake.
4. announcing intent to hammer Cuzz, but never does it (disclaimer: this can be explained by my "interruption" but still he never did hammer even when it became obvious that Cuzz was going to be lynched and not shraeye.
5. His post about Galz's four suspects I think has great potential. And I agree with his analysis. That Galz was likely to talk about one of his partners in that post... so that eliminates Cuzz and shraeye, leaving mcmc and Jimmm. I have already stated that mcmc isn't a great option for today... leaving Jimmm as the only one left from the foursome.
6. His increasing lurkiness as the game goes on. He has explained this as having a hard time doing rereads--yes they are hard, but I just did one in a relativly short amount of time and got a lot out of it--not having a lot of free time--this is valid, life is busy--had more to comment during the early game than now--I strongly question this, I mean there is sooooo much to talk about now, whereas day1 didn't have nearly as much--and that his former strong reads are dead--all of which were wrong, this sounds mean, but it is true... Scummy reads on Cuzz, shraeye, eevee, townie read on Galz... I dont' remember his read on raerae.
7. trying to paint robz/mcmc as certainly on the same team... I guess this isn't so much a reason for scumminess, but simply a disagreement on how to interpret the events...

Let's see how all this holds up with the possibility of him being Marquis, as it isn't possible for him to be MU.

Point 1: is gone as he can't be partners with Galz.
Point 2: The weird claiming thing makes sense if his beloved princess role holds to be true.
Point 3: Still potentially a valid point, but I think was one of the more minor points I brought up in this post
Point 4: Still think it was weird, but he did have more of a scum read on shraeye at that time and worked hard and pushed people to get it to that point.
Point 5: no longer valid--but I was right about one of the four Galz lists as being his partner in mcmc!
Point 6: his lurking was an issue and was what first caught my attention. He did bring up the point that my mean comment about his reads being wrong was true and was partially why he was... I don't know... lacking in confidence a bit?
Point 7: like I said above this was more a disagreement about how to interpret events... and one in which I still could be in the wrong.

As for newer events such this...

He did have express a townread on Glooble. at this point Glooble was at L-2 and instead joined the lio wagon. He expressed that he thought his lurkiness was potentially caused by just being genuinely busy.

Day 4:

After Glooble's lynch Jimmm is much more active and a leader of town and is ultimately the only player not voting for dsell or lio at one point but doesn't vote for either as dsell gets lynched

Day 5: he is then very early on the mcmc wagon.

I haven't reread Robz at this point, but I think I would be hesitant to vote for Jimmmm. My main concerns with him earlier revolved around him potentially being partners with Galz. But as that is no longer possible much of my suspicion has eroded. But I do still feel justified that my guess that one of the four Galz listed was a scum partner in mcmc.

Logged

Jimmmmm

  • Torturer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1766
  • Shuffle iT Username: Jimmmmm
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2566 on: February 18, 2013, 10:47:02 pm »

4: The Cuzz thing was weird. I had a major Townread on Cuzz for most of the day, and then I really didn't like how he was responding to his imminent lynch. My intent to hammer, IIRC, was primarily to try to get him to start cooperating, but at the same time I would have hammered if he continued doing what I saw as stalling. His Dsell/me Mason thing actually made some sense to me (I'd noticed Dsell's continued Townread on me and thought he might be a "Guard", as I mentioned above), and I was still thinking about it when he was lynched.
6: I'm just glad I was right about mcmc: I can finally say that I've made a positive contribution to the game.
7: With the Robz/mcmc thing, I just didn't consider the possibility that scum could kill and use their other night action on the same night, which if Robz was telling the truth, it now appears that Galz did. After more thought, it now seems fairly obvious to me that scum can do this, since it was possible for someone to be both SK and Cop.
Logged
f.ds QuickTopic Archive - 119,313 posts from 1,886 QTs, mostly from old Forum Games, available for your perusal!

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2567 on: February 18, 2013, 11:00:47 pm »

Robz:

So I think my main concern with Robz at this point is that he is the only player to have seriously deflected away from known scum in mcmc on Day2. This is something that is very hard to overlook.

Quote
Okay, I do think the Mcmc lynch is a mistake. I am a 1-shot Tracker. Last night, I tracked mcmcsalot. He took no action. I think this makes him significantly less likely to be scum, given what we know already.

FWIW, I have some (disastrous) experience as a Tracker (in M-XII, where I epic fail at it), but I still think my psychology for picking who to track was pretty much on in that game, so I stuck with it. I don't want to track the obvious people, because the obvious people aren't going to kill anyone (because they expect the tracker to be watching them). This is mafia 101, even in games without a tracker for some reason the less suspicious partner does the kill (Galz always did the kill in M-II; I was more suspicious, even though it didn't matter). So I was not going to track the people who came under heavy suspicion yesterday, which includes shraeye, Jimm, and Eevee basically. I was never going to track Galzria because he's just too obvious a person anyway, and there's always that likelihood he gets nightkilled just for being Galzria--which I bet is what happened here; I doubt a scum faction really thought they were shooting scum in Galz. So I wanted to pick someone who I thought could be scum, but who didn't know that I thought they could be scum. Like, Glooble and Dsell I really didn't think were scum, so I wasn't picking them. Also, just from what I know about my brother, he's like a really gung-ho guy (he posted his phone number in blitz whatever for goodness sake, so people could tell him when the lynch was happening), and it seemed reasonable if he was on a scumfaction he'd be likely to be the one taking the shot, just because he wanted to, in addition to everything else.

Well, he didn't do anything. I've thought about this a lot; this means he's probably not scum, right? If he were scum, and he were on Galzria's team, well, Galz is the rolecop, and it's pretty likely Galz can't take the shot AND rolecop someone, so unless it's a three person team, Mcmc takes the shot there. If Mcmc were SK, he has to take the shot. Of course there's a perfectly plausible scenario where Mcmc is on some other team, and for whatever reason was not the person who took the shot.

But anyway, I think we'd have to be PRETTY SURE to lynch him, since mathematically it seems to me like his odds of scum are much, much lower, right? I wouldn't bring this up if I thought it was a slamdunk case, but it's not a slamdunk case and from where I am standing it is the least likely lynch to hit scum.

here is the post that he made. At this point mcmc was at L-2. And what Robz is basically saying is that mcmc is less likely to be scum because 1. he didn't target anyone that night and 2. because Galz (if that is his partner, which it ended up being) wouldn't have performed the night kill because galz would have used the rolecop.

So the question here then is this:

If Galz didn't perform the Night Kill. Who did? Mcmc? Robz says that is impossible because he was tracked. Another member of the MU scum team? Robz? We know someone did it. Now I have made the argument before that it is possible that scum could use a power and NK on the same night... but I made that argument primarily based on the idea that scum typically can do both if they are the only remaining player alive... but this was night1 and both Galz and mcmc were still alive. even Robz thinks it rather unlikely....

Now there is the question of why would Robz do this? Or rather why would MU!Robz do this... pretend to be a tracker to save his teammate. I think the answer is potentially clear. He was panicked. One partner had already died in the night, the next was at L-2. He had to do something that would save his partner and also give himself some town credibility. The tracker claim worked beautifully. It really did! Mcmc was off the hook for basically the rest of the game until yesterday. Robz was also absent of some very major pressure.

Add in this as well as that very early into this day, Robz attempt to force the idea that there has to be a marquis scum team alive because ash was lynched--albeit this was in response to lio.  Here is the quote:

Liopoil, you're not thinking this through. If scum thought there was any chance Jimm still had a shot, scum would have shot Jimm. Whoever he is, he couldn't afford a no-kill night.

But what he really couldn't afford was ash surviving and investigating. He has a one third chance of ash investigating him. And even if ash investigated one of the two others, it narrows down ash's guessing to 50%. Not shooting ash is just like way too dangerous for a maquis.

Now, for an MU, shooting ash is the WRONG call, because ash could be an MU! You want to leave as many possible MUs alive, and ash was never cleared of this. So you want to shoot either liopoil, the IC, or Jimm, who cannot actually be an MU (he was cleared by theorel). If you're really afraid of Jimm doctoring, just shoot Jimm. He can't doctor himself.

Shooting ash is the strictly best move for maquis. Really, it's the necessary move for maquis.

Shooting jimm or liopoil is the strictly best move for MU. Shooting ash doesn't necessarily hurt you though, I guess. But it limits the number of suspects for the town to decide between.

Here Robz attempts to explain that a MU wouldn't shoot ash because ash has the potential to be an MU. It is a decent argument. But... there is one thing. It is the perfect argument for Robz as MU to be making. Look at these sequences of events.

1. Mcmc flips as MU. Once this happens, Robz knows that he is going to get it hard in regard to his interaction with mcmc. See my above texts for an example of this.
2. Because of this Robz needs to find a way to avoid this suspicion as being fingered as the last remaining MU.
3. A good way of avoiding this is to make it look like there is no longer a MU scum team, but rather a Marquis one.
4. The best way to do this is to NK the Marquis cop!
5. Then very early in the day plant the idea in our heads that there can't be MU, because why would they kill off the Marquis cop!

Now there is one potential problem with this.... and that is why did Robz join onto the mcmc wagon and lynch his partner? Why not just wait it out and see if someone would change their vote to yuma instead! The answer is actually pretty simple. Robz knew that ash was going to be willing to move his vote onto mcmc, leaving Robz as the only remaining player not voting for MU scum. This would further implicate him as potentially being mcmc's partner... although the fact that he was the last player on the lynch wagon serves to implicate him as well.

Finally I have one last comment. We now know that Jimmm didn't use his doc ability last night. As a result we know that two nights ago a kill was not prevented by a doc. We also apparently know that theorel wasn't double NKed because of the lack of flavour like there was with shraeye. So to follow Robz's logic there were two scum teams alive two nights ago in MU and marquis. MU apparently killed theorel (which makes sense as he is their cop), but Marquis decided to let ashersky live and not shoot and risk being investigated by him? I think not. I think it is better explained that there was only 1 scum team left alive two nights ago, but with 2 players still alive. One night killed theorel. The other roleblocked or JKed me to prevent the LR from activating. And last night the remaining player killed ashersky. That player has to be Robz.

I won't even spend time looking at the possibility of him being a marquis with Glooble and themunch. Which I guess is possible.... But even w/o looking at that evidence--and I am happy to do so if people want me to--I am ready to vote for Robz. He has much more scumminess and evidence pointing in his direction than does Jimmm. I would be amazed to discover that Jimmm is scum over Robz.

Now because Robz will bring it up we should look at the balance question. If I am right... and I think I am right... the scum teams would basically be thus:

MU: Rolecop, Bomb, Roleblocker/JK
Marquis: Neighbor, Roleblocker

It isn't a perfect balance, but in my mind the Bomb is basically useless. It might hit the vig and it might hit the other scum team. Neighbor I think is even more powerful than it. I think it is balanced enough for me to feel comfortable with it.

Lio are we at a point where I can vote. Or should I wait for a bit?
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2568 on: February 18, 2013, 11:37:46 pm »

Your wrong, but most of your points are SO off base, but oh that last one is big time.

Now because Robz will bring it up we should look at the balance question. If I am right... and I think I am right... the scum teams would basically be thus:

MU: Rolecop, Bomb, Roleblocker/JK
Marquis: Neighbor, Roleblocker

It isn't a perfect balance, but in my mind the Bomb is basically useless. It might hit the vig and it might hit the other scum team. Neighbor I think is even more powerful than it. I think it is balanced enough for me to feel comfortable with it.

This is where you give yourself away as scum--there's no way you could actually think that was an acceptable balance from Jo's perspective (Jo, who we have heard from Jimm, was so committed to balance he was willing to add powers mid-game).

Bomb is basically useless?? Not at all. It's much better than Neighbor! Neighbor doesn't even do anything super helpful. Bomb is actually a great way to balance a smaller scum team against a larger one, though, because it assures that the 2 person team is going to get in a venge kill against the bigger team if the bigger team shoots them. Bomb is actually the perfect role to give to a 2-perosn team, given the presence of a 3-person team.

You've also misstated (deliberately?) the Maquis team. Glooble was a 1-shot Roleblocker, not a roleblocker. So basically you are saying the MUs have a full Rolecop, Bomb, and some sort of Blocker... to compete with the Maquis' Neighbor and 1-shot Roleblocker. Frankly, this is impossible. Wouldn't Glooble have at least been made a full Roleblocker, to make these teams remotely fair? No, there's no way the third person is a roleblocking MU.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2569 on: February 18, 2013, 11:44:23 pm »

As for the rest of your case, I agree that my actions resemble someone who was allied with mcmcsalot. The alternative answer is simply that scum can both use a power and perform the night kill, and that Galz did the kill. Is it what I expected? No. But it's not the most farfetched thing in the world. It's certainly less farfetched than the scum teams you proposed.

As to who killed ash and why, of course it's WIFOM. Still, I hardly think killing ash would put me in a better position than killing lio, if I was scum. Ash has been my biggest defender, unwilling to vote me, and 100% convinced of my towniness at every step of the game. Lio, on the other hand, has repeatedly clashed with me and voted for me, and is himself completely immune from suspicion as an IC (whereas ash was not). But, again, it's WIFOM... you'll say I want to do the thing that doesn't make sense so I can argue against it, blah.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2570 on: February 18, 2013, 11:49:19 pm »

Really the only thing giving me pause about you, though, is the lack of an extra kill two nights ago. I admit that doesn't make much sense. Surely you would want to kill ash then? I mean, maybe it's just that you didn't think he was going to investigate you, he was going to investigate liopoil. So by not killing, you get to enjoy a day where we are MU hunting instead of maquis, because for all we knew all the maquis were dead. of course you weren't cleared from being MU...
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.

yuma

  • Minion
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2571 on: February 19, 2013, 08:50:40 am »

Look, I agree it isn't a perfect balance. But I don't think it is as far off as you seem to think it is. But regardless, you do bring back the point of scum being Marquis rather than MU. Like I mentioned in the post above I think you fit the MU role and haven't looked very closely at the possibility of you being Marquis.

That would make the teams:

MU: Rolecop, Bomb
Marquis: Neighbor, 1-shot Roleblocker, x-shot JK

This doesn't seem anymore balanced than the alternative though. A little off, but close enough.

Or if you think I am still lying.

MU: Rolecop, Bomb
Marquis: Neighbor 1-shot Roleblocker, X-role.

Again, doesn't seem anymore balanced than the alternative. A little off, but close enough.

I guess I will be looking closely at the possibility of you (Robz) being Marquis tonight after all.
Logged

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2572 on: February 19, 2013, 09:10:24 am »

Robz, there is definatly a fair chance of there bieng another MU. and if there is another MU I feel very good about it being you.

Yuma, you can go ahead and vote. I'll make a solid rule actually:

Anyone can vote all they want, as long as they don't ever put anyone at two votes, or L-1, unless the only person who could quickhammer is me.

I think this makes it so that scum can never quickhammer. Therefore I don't think I'm going to vote until I hammer.

Part of the reason that I was saying we shouldn't worry about Jimmmmm is related to this. We need everyone except the lynchee to agree. I was fairly sure that yuma and robz were going to have solid "scumreads" on each other, and leave their votes parked on each other.

Yuma stole the points I was going to make about why MU might kill ash. what seems less likely is that maquis wouldn't kill anyone that one night. I could make a case that it HAS to be MU, not maquis based on this.
Logged

liopoil

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2587
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2573 on: February 19, 2013, 09:13:51 am »

maquis would especially want to kill Ash the night theorel died because they knew he would investigate me, which would clear me. The only thing I can think of is maybe they thought Yuma's LR would go through, so they thought that maybe they could make town assume that there was only MU left by yuma not dying (Jimmmmm saves him). Or I guess if Yuma was Maquis he could have used LR and not killed anyone so that he would survive. (again relying on Jimmmmm saving him.)
Logged

Robz888

  • Margrave
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2644
  • Shuffle iT Username: Robz888
    • View Profile
Re: Mafia XIX: Deep Space Nine Mafia (Day 6)
« Reply #2574 on: February 19, 2013, 01:33:15 pm »

Look, I agree it isn't a perfect balance. But I don't think it is as far off as you seem to think it is. But regardless, you do bring back the point of scum being Marquis rather than MU. Like I mentioned in the post above I think you fit the MU role and haven't looked very closely at the possibility of you being Marquis.

That would make the teams:

MU: Rolecop, Bomb
Marquis: Neighbor, 1-shot Roleblocker, x-shot JK

This doesn't seem anymore balanced than the alternative though. A little off, but close enough.

Or if you think I am still lying.

MU: Rolecop, Bomb
Marquis: Neighbor 1-shot Roleblocker, X-role.

Again, doesn't seem anymore balanced than the alternative. A little off, but close enough.

I guess I will be looking closely at the possibility of you (Robz) being Marquis tonight after all.

I haven't looked closely at the possibility of me being maquis because I am not maquis. I haven't addressed the accusation that I am a maquis because there haven't been any. I am self-aware that the case that I am MU is better than the case that I am maquis (although I have voted to lynch members of both teams, but a smart partner would have had to, sure).

If you do think I'm maquis, I would argue that I was most directly responsible for shifting the Day 3 lynch to Glooble instead of liopoil. I re-read them both and settled, narrowly, on Glooble. The town then followed my lead and we lynched maquis Glooble. Hopefully this is at least some evidence that I am not maquis.
Logged
I have been forced to accept that lackluster play is a town tell for you.
Pages: 1 ... 101 102 [103] 104 105 ... 125  All
 

Page created in 0.083 seconds with 20 queries.