I really don't understand the Munch wagon, what we need to do is look at people in relation to Grujah yesterday, look at reasons why people were off the wagon (i agree that more suspicions--but not all the suspicion--should go here), and reasons why people were on the wagon. I'll be doing that in my next post, after I say one more time that y'all are wrong about Munch. I recall what eevee said about day 1 much earlier
"Lets not go after the first guy who gets up to 6 votes because of some pseudo-slip like we usually do, we all know how that would work out.
Also, ftl's point was an excellent one. This forum tends to want lynch active players for slips that weren't really slips."
I know that day 2 will be different, and with more information, many of the pseudo-slips are more likely to be actual slips. But it feels like lots of people are treating this with day 1 attitude and haven't made use of the past information we have when determining if Munch feels scummy or actually is being scummy (eHalcyon has looked at the past stuff, i know, kudos to that action--but he still needs to lay off of his Munch tunnelling). I love that anyone is reading into my defending Munch as a scumpairing. Yeah, that's a real bang-up job of scum that we're doing. "Hey, I know, I'll be all caustic and make people upset at me, while you post vague and easily misconstrued posts so that everyone gets a bad feeling about you. Then instead of doing something rational and cutting ties with you and trying to gain cred, I'll just shout at the top of my lungs that you're town hoping that people believe me"
This little wagon on Munch just feels like day 1 blundering instead of the day 2 calculated lynches that we should be able to pull off. I really feel like people aren't paying enough attention to eHalcyon's post about off-wagon people. To use his words:
"We have all this info and nobody wants to use it. Come on people."
So next post will have info and me making use of it.