But I don't buy Ashersky's conflict with faust - the argument that from the name of an item you can make an educated guess on what it does is reasonable. Having just one item confirmed is solid evidence for that argument. Besides, no one seemed to have any issue with people suggesting that Bow and Arrow was likely vig.
What do you mean by not "buying" my conflict? Do you mean that I am faking the fight with faust (which would make us partners)? Are you saying you don't agree with my side of the argument? Please clarify.
You say "having just one item confirmed is solid evidence for that argument." Is that your honest belief in how the world work? Here:
"Slamming my head on a keyboard is an efficient way to write out genetic code."
cfklxzklcx.cx,/l;ssdl;kkl;dlskr;eior5opK4['wrIOWEF'a;u/kls;aior'q'.lcx,cxkdxlop.vg;lp.cjmjxkkdkslo;.pxl;.jkchjcxvhjkvjucfjsdlo.zsl.djumdweidiofp/womjm fiuexol.;wik,dkuedxku,edxlfcku,ifggciufxudki,fcj,fcxhmdzjmufxku,fckfdxjdxzj,dxkifxck,udryehdxzk,fclifc,kfdxdj
Hey look, there's at least one instance of consecutive letters that correspond to the way we write out genetic code in there. Looks like we have "one item confirmed" that "is solid evidence for that argument."