SS isn’t this flawed as Town
vote: debate. Even if he did appropriate my question, that's not very scummy.
The evidence is below.
SS continues to pester (98 & 315) MCMC about how serious was he about the block plan, but MCMC already said it, not once but twice (253 & 271). They MCMC & SS where functionally taking about MiX being scummy about lying in that same timeframe (MCMC-258 & SS-261).
When confronted with this fact (MiX 317), SS says that wasn't his question (yes it was) and morphs the question into EFHWs question (260). Why is SS push MCMC when MCMC answered the question twice while SS was on? Why does SS ask EFHW's question, partners?
The Dialogs: (Read this section bottom up)
SS (
320) - Not quite answer, want to know what would they have done if people went along?
MiX (
317) - they did in 271.
SS (
315) - 2 days later - Please answer my ?
SS (
276) 1009am - dialog mix policy vote, don’t lie or not keep promises as Town.
MCMC (
275) 1006am - answers db8’s question about how scum hunting can be non-protown
MCMC (
271) 956am - had some town reads, block could have led to interesting interactions for future examination
SS (
261) 911am - Vote MiX for “there is no reason for me to follow through with my word”
EFHW (
260) 908am - How did you imagine the plan working?
MCMC (
258) 854am - Questions MiX for “there is no reason for me to follow through with my word”
MCMC (
253) 758am - Vote: EFHW & Serious
SS (
98) - how serious was your block?