no result was also because of anything that can go on in this game. who steals stuff and why on N3? How did my result be exact on N1?
Your result for N1, while correct, was arbitrary. If nobody had claimed to target Robz, you easily could've suggested that scum (Gkrieg here) must've stolen from Robz N1 or targeted him in some fashion (RB, RC, JK, anything).
N3 I'm guessing you stole from Mcmc for two reasons:
A) To get the sword. Definitely the right play here. Don't want that falling into hands that can use it.
B) To safely check whether I commuted without wasting your kill on the possibility that I could/did.
question is why nothing was stolen before N3.
Also explain, how all my targets made sense from scum!perspective? I md'ed Robz then Haddock, then mcmc, then faust then Hydrad. Those were my scumreads.
Robz & Haddock didn't have items. N1, N2. Mcmc had his items stolen. N3. Faust had his items stolen. N4.
Your claimed MD targets match perfectly with potential thievery. And you're never wrong about Motion around said players.
Of course I am never wrong, this is my role, mod doesn't lie.
How exactly dumb should I be to claim my own stealing targets if I am the stealer?
Only kind of. Had you claimed motion elsewhere (or none), you ran the risk of being called out ("Actually, I DID take an action last night" or "That's weird, how can there be motion when nobody targeted said player")
Also, it's hard to really argue those were your scum reads. Look at your voting history through D4:
Hydrad, Mcmc, faust, faust, Gkrieg, faust, Robz, PPS, faust, IDPTG, faust, faust, Gkrieg, faust, Gkrieg
No votes Robz D1, or Haddock D1 or D2. And while you had a single vote on Mcmc D1, it would've been silly to MD him as a scum read D3 when you knew he was IC'ing himself (or not) D4. I mean, why would you target someone to check for motion that
you knew was going to be using an item and creating motion? Like, what did you hope to learn here?
Whereas it makes sense that you were stealing the sword...