Space, while calling scum teams is almost always frowned upon it's definitely something that's been on my mind because somewhere the bids just... have to make sense. I believe what I've proposed for You/Swan/e/iguana does that.
I actually disagree that calling scumteams is a bad idea -- I've used interactions before to look for likely sets of people. It's actually more likely to be accurate than considering each person alone, because they're likely to acting as part of a team. However, the thing here is that you're proposing a team based not on interactions or mutual support or whatever, but on your personal aesthetic for what you think a desirable set of bids for a scumteam would be. The whole point of this sort of bidding game is that the unexpected bids perform better than the sheep-bids, so "this is a good spread of numbers that performed well" is not a strong premise for an entire case.
I'm not against reconsidering my position on Faust. The point that you've made regarding vote history is valid. I was 100% wrong on votes in M100 while you were 100% correct - and (I, as scum) argued you were too perfect to be town.
And you won that game for scum by getting me mislynched with exactly that argument.
Here, Faust is in that situation of being 100% wrong. That said, his sample size is far smaller (3 lynches), and Iguana was lynched primarily by those who logged on - so it's not quite fair to hold that one against him (I'm assuming he didn't post D3, but could be wrong).
Are you really saying that faust, strong player that he is, lives this long while acting this scummily, and is still more likely in your opinion to be town than I am, when your primary case against me is in number bids?
So what's the scum team that reasonably gets them Poisoner?
Am I being invited to join in your name-the-team game now, just so you can go back to telling us that it's frowned upon to call teams? :-P I'll bite anyway. I think faust/Eevee/e/Iguana works convincingly, with e as poisoner, faust as the RB/JOAT, and Eevee as scum!tracker.
faust: 73, got #9, Barracks, claimed as iguana.
Eevee: 5, got #13, Tracker
e: 4/8?, got #1, Poisoner, claimed as faust.
iguana 3, got #15, Goon, claimed as e.
Sorry if the formatting is weird.. it's pasted from my text buffer of ideas about the game, and I'm using a monospaced font over there to keep things lined up nicely. I think blanketing 3, 4 and 5, plus having an oddball bid is at least as plausible as your "they must have exactly n Lost numbers" theory, and I'm basing my scum team call on actual behaviour/votes in-game, rather than on the bids first and then fitting behavioural evidence retrospectively.
I'm also not saying that I don't believe any other suggestions about DatSwan being a good possibility, but given that your argument against him also incorrectly tars me at the same time, I remain sceptical.