@Joseph, are you deliberately ignoring my request for you to clarify how your traitor reasoning works with respect to LL?
Somewhat purposely. I saw it yesterday, but by that time I wasn't sobre enough to give a decent response.
If LL is traitor and he thinks WW is town, then he's being clever by getting himself off of a mislynch wagon. But he can then use vig shot to shoot WW, and there's another person lynched. I.e. He gets more information, and the person he thinks is town still dies.
Of course, it turned out WW was scum, but we have to assume the traitor was pretty sure WW was town.
Your logic is still horribly tenuous even without alcohol getting involved. What you're saying is that at post #80 in the thread, which is where LL switched his vote from WW to me, LL had such a convincing townread on WW that he formulated a plan to gain townpoints for cleverly and pointedly withdrawing support for the wagon. That's what you're saying, right?
By post #80, WW had made two whole posts in the
entire game. The first actual game post in the thread was at post #49, and was LL. The second was at post #50, and that was where LL voted for WW. So that's 30 posts'-worth of playing in which LL formulated all this (in case you want to count things up in terms of how much PoE info he might also have gathered in that time). I think there's just nothing there to support your "leading theory" about how LL is the traitor.
OTOH, gkrieg was suggesting that LL moving his vote might be an indication he's WW's partner. I can see that idea much more clearly, because in that case, LL knows WW's alignment and knows he doesn't want the wagon to succeed. I feel like you've seen gkrieg making an argument about how LL's vote was scummy, changed it around a bit so you can pretend it's original insight, and then suddenly had to retrofit a sub-par excuse to it after the fact.