Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Seprix]

Lynch me or don't. You have two days to decide.

[Awaclus]

Player's don't play perfectly.

They need to, and it needs to be assumed.

[Joseph2302]

Deadline: Tuesday, June 21st at 5 p.m. forum time

So, just over 31 hours? We need to start actually doing things then.
I'd lynch RR or Seprix.
RR is scum.
Seprix is definitely anti-town (fakeclaiming which helped scum is so bad), and could well be scum.
No-one else seems particularly scummy to me.

[Haddock]

I'm OK with an RR lynch.

Chickening out of the Seprix lynch a bit, to be honest.  I still think he's probably better than RR, but only slightly now.  Awaclus's hyperactive tunneling is not exactly making me feel comfortable about the location of my vote.

[gkrieg13]

Vote Count 2.krieg

Seprix (2): ced, iguana, Awaclus, Haddock
Roadrunner (0): Joseph, gkrieg
gkrieg (0): Seprix
Joseph (2): Roadrunner, ADK
Awaclus (0): silverspawn



With 10 alive, it takes 6 to majority lynch

Deadline: Tuesday, June 21st at 5 p.m. forum time


I think this is the current vote count. On mobile so had to remember votes but it wasn't too bad

[iguanaiguana]

It is amazing to me that the day did not go like this:

3 couples votes Seprix within 48 hours > lynch Seprix > day ends.

Instead, we are wasting our time talking about nothing all day long unable to cobble a lynch together until the deadline.

The only consolation is that when we do still lynch Seprix at EoD, at least tomorrow we can look at the people who opposed his lynch today and decide which of them is his remaining partner, and which of them are just people who are wrong.

I have nothing else to say about this game.

[Awaclus]

Awaclus's hyperactive tunneling is not exactly making me feel comfortable about the location of my vote.

It should. My reads have a tendency to be excellent.

[gkrieg13]

I'm actually fine with any of the three lynches at this point.

[iguanaiguana]

Awaclus's hyperactive tunneling is not exactly making me feel comfortable about the location of my vote.

It should. My reads have a tendency to be excellent.

Who do you think is the third scum?

[Awaclus]

Awaclus's hyperactive tunneling is not exactly making me feel comfortable about the location of my vote.

It should. My reads have a tendency to be excellent.

Who do you think is the third scum?

I'm not going to answer that.

[silverspawn]

I'll support RR over Seprix, because RR is a wildcard. But Awaclus is the way to go.

[gkrieg13]

I guess I should point out the reason I'm not commenting too much us that I'm really fine with a lynch of any of the three but want RR just a little bit more than seprix so I will leave my vote there.  Plus unless we get to deadline a vote on seprix from me won't get him lynched

[Joseph2302]

Joseph lynch >>>> Seprix lynch

Even though I'm sort of worried he wouldn't tunnel me as scum knowing I'm town, I still would enjoy his lynch.

I'll stop tunnelling you when I get an acceptable answer to this:

Why would killing faust be better than killing me & you?

I cannot see scum taking 1 kill over 2, ergo you must be scum.

[Roadrunner7671]

WIFOM. Why kill us when they could get us to waste 2 days lynching each other?

[Haddock]

Awaclus's hyperactive tunneling is not exactly making me feel comfortable about the location of my vote.

It should. My reads have a tendency to be excellent.

Tell that to all the people you've tunneled to a mislynch/near mislynch lately.

I might be willing to concede that when you give townreads they tend to be accurate. 

PPE Joseph.  The answer to that is pretty obvious - so that town think the way you're thinking and lynch you and RR, for two free mislynches.  WIFOM, basically.  I thought it was likely you would be killed anyway, but scum get benefit either way.

[iguanaiguana]

Haddock & Roadrunner give the exact same answer to a question. Lulz

[Awaclus]

Tell that to all the people you've tunneled to a mislynch/near mislynch lately.

What about all the people I've tunneled to a correct lynch/near correct lynch lately?

[iguanaiguana]

I don't really think your success rate has been better than most people. In this case, though, it's pretty clear that Seprix is scum.

[iguanaiguana]

I mean, better than average in the past several games.

[Seprix]

Awaclus's hyperactive tunneling is not exactly making me feel comfortable about the location of my vote.

It should. My reads have a tendency to be excellent.

On the contrary, you've said I was scum every game, and so far, you have been wrong every single time. I mean, you'll eventually be right, but you apparently cannot read me at all it seems.

In other news, I could vote for RR, Iguana, Joseph, or gkrieg. I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

[Joseph2302]

In other news, I could vote for RR, Iguana, Joseph, or gkrieg. I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

So very non-committal then? Basically, you'll vote for anyone to get lynched other than you.

[Awaclus]

I mean, better than average in the past several games.

It has been higher than the expected 1/4 for sure. I didn't check whether or not this is true though because I'm confident enough that it is.

On the contrary, you've said I was scum every game, and so far, you have been wrong every single time. I mean, you'll eventually be right, but you apparently cannot read me at all it seems.

In other news, I could vote for RR, Iguana, Joseph, or gkrieg. I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

More blatant lies. In 1 out of 1 games I've played with you recently, I did not vote for you and you ended up being town.


But more importantly, Seprix completely blew it with this post.

I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

In other words, he has current information, according to which anyone else cannot even potentially be scum. Only scum can have that kind of information.

[iguanaiguana]

I mean, better than average in the past several games.

It has been higher than the expected 1/4 for sure. I didn't check whether or not this is true though because I'm confident enough that it is.

On the contrary, you've said I was scum every game, and so far, you have been wrong every single time. I mean, you'll eventually be right, but you apparently cannot read me at all it seems.

In other news, I could vote for RR, Iguana, Joseph, or gkrieg. I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

More blatant lies. In 1 out of 1 games I've played with you recently, I did not vote for you and you ended up being town.


But more importantly, Seprix completely blew it with this post.

I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

In other words, he has current information, according to which anyone else cannot even potentially be scum. Only scum can have that kind of information.

Why are you wasting your time arguing with someone who is already the majority-rules lynch?

[Seprix]

But more importantly, Seprix completely blew it with this post.

I don't think anyone else is potentially scum with the current information I have.

In other words, he has current information, according to which anyone else cannot even potentially be scum. Only scum can have that kind of information.

It also could mean I'm a PR. Or it could mean that I only have information regarding what I reread, and that more information will be revealed once the next NK and lynch happens, along with all of the PR claims afterwards.

[Awaclus]

Why are you wasting your time arguing with someone who is already the majority-rules lynch?

As I see it, it can only have a positive impact on the game. If it doesn't end up having any, that's fine too.