Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Awaclus]

play this game or die.

That's pretty violent.

[gkrieg13]

I requested faust because I had a scum read on him so it would have been pretty good to become lovers with him, also I didn't want to lose my ability to vote for Seprix who was an even bigger scum read.

Ya I understand that now.  It's kinda too bad

[Roadrunner7671]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

[Haddock]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

I'd like a poll on what people think of this post.
I for one think it looks like RR trying to emulate his meta.  But I have no idea any more re. RR. His meta is way unpredictable of late.

[Roadrunner7671]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

I'd like a poll on what people think of this post.
I for one think it looks like RR trying to emulate his meta.  But I have no idea any more re. RR. His meta is way unpredictable of late.

I think it's scummy but ADK has been super quiet, and the thread has been super quiet, so it's something to talk about.

Challenge Joseph

[gkrieg13]

I'm fine with a Seprix, RR, or Joseph lynch at this point.  Would rather lynch Joseph, but Seprix would make me very happy as well.

[Seprix]

Why is a Joseph lynch okay? Isn't he a Doctor?

[Seprix]

Okay, scratch that, Joseph is fine. He is no longer a lover. That's right, I forgot.

[A Drowned Kernel]

vote: joseph

Let's stir up some shit.

[Seprix]

I think I will be rereading Joseph tomorrow.

[Joseph2302]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

I'd like a poll on what people think of this post.
I for one think it looks like RR trying to emulate his meta.  But I have no idea any more re. RR. His meta is way unpredictable of late.

I think it's scummy but ADK has been super quiet, and the thread has been super quiet, so it's something to talk about.

Challenge Joseph

I'm okay with a challenge. Just lynch one of us today, if we mislynch me then they can lynch you tomorrow.

[Roadrunner7671]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

I'd like a poll on what people think of this post.
I for one think it looks like RR trying to emulate his meta.  But I have no idea any more re. RR. His meta is way unpredictable of late.

I think it's scummy but ADK has been super quiet, and the thread has been super quiet, so it's something to talk about.

Challenge Joseph

I'm okay with a challenge. Just lynch one of us today, if we mislynch me then they can lynch you tomorrow.

This is a problem. I think it's very possible we're both town and both of us will get lynched.

[Awaclus]

Let's just correctly lynch Seprix today.

[Joseph2302]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

I'd like a poll on what people think of this post.
I for one think it looks like RR trying to emulate his meta.  But I have no idea any more re. RR. His meta is way unpredictable of late.

I think it's scummy but ADK has been super quiet, and the thread has been super quiet, so it's something to talk about.

Challenge Joseph

I'm okay with a challenge. Just lynch one of us today, if we mislynch me then they can lynch you tomorrow.

This is a problem. I think it's very possible we're both town and both of us will get lynched.

If you think I might be town, then why on earth launch a challenge against me?

[Roadrunner7671]

Vote: Joseph
Everything he says about me applies to him. Why was he so quick to claim? Why is he tunneling me? Is it really because he thinks I'm scum...?

I'd like a poll on what people think of this post.
I for one think it looks like RR trying to emulate his meta.  But I have no idea any more re. RR. His meta is way unpredictable of late.

I think it's scummy but ADK has been super quiet, and the thread has been super quiet, so it's something to talk about.

Challenge Joseph

I'm okay with a challenge. Just lynch one of us today, if we mislynch me then they can lynch you tomorrow.

This is a problem. I think it's very possible we're both town and both of us will get lynched.

If you think I might be town, then why on earth launch a challenge against me?

Because I'm not a Gladiator and I do what I want.

[EFHW]

Vote Count 2.2

Seprix (2): ced, iguana, Awaclus, Haddock
Roadrunner (0): Joseph, gkrieg
gkrieg (0): silverspawn
Joseph (2): Roadrunner, ADK

not voting (1): Seprix

With 10 alive, it takes 6 to majority lynch

Deadline: Tuesday, June 21st at 5 p.m. forum time

[ced]

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.

I don't see any reason or rule why you shouldn't be able to quote from the qts. I believe I've quoted from the qt at least a couple of times yesterday, and nothing happened to me anyway. The mod can correct me if I'm wrong.

Why are you voting Joseph?

[EFHW]

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.

I don't see any reason or rule why you shouldn't be able to quote from the qts. I believe I've quoted from the qt at least a couple of times yesterday, and nothing happened to me anyway. The mod can correct me if I'm wrong.

Why are you voting Joseph?

You may only exact quote yourself.  Anything else should be paraphrased.

[A Drowned Kernel]

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.

I don't see any reason or rule why you shouldn't be able to quote from the qts. I believe I've quoted from the qt at least a couple of times yesterday, and nothing happened to me anyway. The mod can correct me if I'm wrong.

Why are you voting Joseph?

I'm sheeping my date to see what happens.

[Joseph2302]

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.

I don't see any reason or rule why you shouldn't be able to quote from the qts. I believe I've quoted from the qt at least a couple of times yesterday, and nothing happened to me anyway. The mod can correct me if I'm wrong.

Why are you voting Joseph?

I'm sheeping my date to see what happens.

Your date is scum though.

[Seprix]

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.

I don't see any reason or rule why you shouldn't be able to quote from the qts. I believe I've quoted from the qt at least a couple of times yesterday, and nothing happened to me anyway. The mod can correct me if I'm wrong.

Why are you voting Joseph?

I'm sheeping my date to see what happens.

Your date is scum though.

Not to pull an Awaclus, did you just confess that you are scum?

[Joseph2302]

The problem is, AFAIK exact quoting is not allowed, and its the specific wording he used that made it seem scummy to me. I said that I didn't see how me telling him who I requested would benefit him as scum but that I didn't want to do it anyway just in case, and he replied that he also didn't see how it would benefit him as scum, except worded in such a way that seemed like a scumslip because it implied that he was in fact scum.

I don't see any reason or rule why you shouldn't be able to quote from the qts. I believe I've quoted from the qt at least a couple of times yesterday, and nothing happened to me anyway. The mod can correct me if I'm wrong.

Why are you voting Joseph?

I'm sheeping my date to see what happens.

Your date is scum though.

Not to pull an Awaclus, did you just confess that you are scum?

No.
I told ADK that his date is scum.
His date is RR.
How is that "me admitting being scum"?

[Seprix]

I thought you were his date.

[ced]

The game's slowing down for some reason. We're halfway through the day and not a lot has happened.

On Joseph/RR: Firstly, I consider this situation not necessarily a dichotomy. It's certainly possible that they didn't get NK'd as lovers because one of them is scum, but there's just too much WIFOM to consider it a definite.
I am more interested in their part in Jimmm's lynch. After all, he got lynched pretty much because he had several votes on him at a critical juncture - and RR/Joseph were these votes. What I would like to know is what was going on in their qt when they voted. RR/Joseph: In your own words, why do you think the other one of you voted for Jimmm?

On Seprix: His lover claim yesterday is the big thing. Now, lying about role info can be a tricky thing sometimes - I have known some players to lie about critical info on somebody if they're sure they are scum. But I don't know if I believe Seprix's explanation here. He says that he was "100% sure" Jimmm was town after 705, but to me that seems a stretch at best - Jimmm was just refusing to contribute to the end in that post, and I could have told you that yesterday. I just don't believe he was that sure he was prepared to lie to save Jimmm.
As for his posting today, I'm not impressed. In 807 he says that he "thinks he's found the next scum", but then he says in 829 that he lost his big post (I could buy that, it's happened to me before), but his tldr is more of a PoE that omits ADK for some strange reason. There's no real analysis going on here, or even naming of who he thinks is scum - his rhetoric is to mention "alternatives" and a "viable option" (words I consider suggestive of an underlying mindset of looking for mislynches). As of yet, there's still no explanation of his tldr, and it feels like he's stalling.

[Seprix]

I forgot to write the thing. Thanks for reminding me, I will either do it tonight or tomorrow. Off to work.