Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[silverspawn]

18. ◯/L

[silverspawn]

I keep waiting for the amazing winning streak but it's not happening

[silverspawn]

19. M/L

[silverspawn]

Ok let's try again tomorrow

[silverspawn]

New day!

1. ◯/W
2. ◯/W
3. ◯/W
4. ◯/W

Better! Granted, two of them have mistakes that almost qualify, but the category was supposed to be only for really bad mistakes that I think I should realistically almost never make. And in game 2 my opponent resigned after 2 moves, but I'm counting it. You can't stop me.

[silverspawn]

5. ◯/L
6. M/W

That's too bad. I played against someone with 9/10 luck and eventually won his queen (though it wouldn't have worked if he had calculated, but I guess if he had calculated I wouldn't have gotten in time trouble either) but I had too little time to win it

Then he challenged me to a rematch and obviously lost. But I got annoyed and blundered a pawn, hence the M

[silverspawn]

Having insane luck and then winning in a lost position due to time and then challenging your opponent to a rematch is... actually probably a pretty good strategy since it'll make them emotional

[silverspawn]

Still that's one M in 6 games, that's better. Let's keep that up. Not not right now I really need to get stuff done

[silverspawn]

7. ◯/L
8. M/L

[silverspawn]

9. ◯/W
10. M/L
11. ◯/W

[silverspawn]

Everyone who talks about the brain in relation to digital AI seems to have one of two positions

- Obviously if the brain does X, then AI needs to do something very similar to X or it can't work
- Obviously it doesn't matter what the brain does lol stack more layers

With the first one usually from neuroscientists and the second from AI people. Both of these are really stupid! And actually the first seems more stupid on first glance since there are clear counter-examples, like airplanes, where we ignored what biology did and solved the problem differently.

It is true that AI requires a ridiculous amount of data to do anything and humans don't, but it's not at all clear that this limitation is fatal.

[silverspawn]

12. ◯/W
13. ◯/L

At some point I gotta analyze this data for correlations and also for effect of order

[silverspawn]

14. ◯/W

[silverspawn]

15. ◯/W
16. M/L

[silverspawn]

17. ◯/W
18. ◯/W
19. ◯/L
20. ◯/W
21. ◯/L
22. ◯/L

Ok let's try again tomorrow. But at least no more blunders.

[silverspawn]

Actually I think 19 was M/L

[Awaclus]

Everyone who talks about the brain in relation to digital AI seems to have one of two positions

- Obviously if the brain does X, then AI needs to do something very similar to X or it can't work
- Obviously it doesn't matter what the brain does lol stack more layers

With the first one usually from neuroscientists and the second from AI people. Both of these are really stupid! And actually the first seems more stupid on first glance since there are clear counter-examples, like airplanes, where we ignored what biology did and solved the problem differently.

It is true that AI requires a ridiculous amount of data to do anything and humans don't, but it's not at all clear that this limitation is fatal.

The amount of data in human genes is ridiculous.

[silverspawn]

Yeah but that's like hard-coded data; I think that's comparable to the program code of AI, not the training data. Wrt training, the observation is that a child can understand what a horse is based on 2 pictures, and an artificial neural net needs 2000 (or probably more).

[silverspawn]

So idk about anyone else but I find this super fascinating



In my model, the seeing is part of qualia, which means that it relies on the global EM field that doesn't care about the connection between hemispheres, whereas recognizing is at least partially, maybe entirely, due to unconscious processes that do require a physical connection.

Both parts seem really crucial, in that missing either is really debilitating. Ofc this doesn't really apply to split-brain patients since it's only in half of their field, and so they can solve it by just moving their eyes.

[silverspawn]

[silverspawn]

New day!

1. ◯/W
2. L/W
3. ◯/L (<- opponent was good)
4. ◯/L (<- that was 10/10 luck, one of the most ridiculous games I've ever played)

[silverspawn]

That game is what it looks like when the universe is deciding to fight me

[silverspawn]

5. ◯/W
6. M/L (<- played a beautiful game up until a single mistake)

[silverspawn]

7. M/L (<- ditto)

Should have stopped after #6 but I'm annoyed. Well today isn't working at all.

[silverspawn]

8. ◯/W
9. ◯/L (seemed like my opponent was 500 rating points above me and the analysis said the same, but sometimes you just have perfect games)
10. ◯/W
11. ◯/W