Um. This is bad. OK. I'll respond to some of e's case. Not much I can do other than that.
Oh and I'll
vote: RR because his lynch is guaranteed better than mine.
So. I like my vote where it is. On Haddock.
So I'd love to hear e's case on me since he started the wagon and noone else has offered any reason.
Lets do it.
This was the reason I first cast my vote on Haddock. It felt like he was building a case before a case could be made. Not just on me, but on anyone. Anyway. I thought it was worth a vote.
Dude. I was defending you from a vote placed by a new player for a not very good reason. Simple as that.
And then we get an Awaclus vote. How original. It's not like you won't have people agreeing that Awaclus is scummy. But really, all he had done to that point was argue grammar. Hardly anything scummy. But still, a nice place to hang out on.
Then we get to his first response to "THE WAGON." (at this time it is e, Ichimaru Gin, Axxle, Limetime)
He does several things here:
1) Insists on an official "case"
2) Calls everyone sheepy
3) Claims he hasn't even posted enough for that many people to think he is scummy
Now, I will take those on one by one.
1) Insisting on an official case on D1 is nice and all, and it is a great way for people to think you aren't a great lynch. Because there is no case! I mean, even this long post is nothing but my random ideas about you and how I think you are more scummy than other people except for like one post that I will talk about later.
2) Discrediting votes is scummy
3) Just not true
1) I just wanted any reason at all, not a whole case. Not a single point has been offered until this post you're making now.
2) people were sheeping. No question. That's OK in itself. But the very definition of sheeping is unexplained votes following another players unexplained vote.
3) I was definitely posting less than normal early on today and was aware of it.
He then has this really cool nice unbiased reasoned out post about his attitude toward wagons. Good stuff. Except he even admits that he does it as town and scum (again, that unbiased nonsense that people use to make them look cool and rational and townie. Because it is cool and townie)
People also do that "unbiased nonsense" when they're town.
Well, I already explained the case thing, and it sure is frustrating to get lynched D1 as scum. I mean, you like let your whole team down. It sucks.
He then gets some unvotes, cools down, and we get this:
but I do still want to see e's case.
And yes. I am still working on it. Give me some time. For realz.
Ok but you never indicated that you were working on it. Forgive me for nagging.
He is now in the clear, and able to post some good reads. Except he forgets that he used to find Awaclus scummy. I mean, I seriously doubt that is a partner tell, I think it is more of "I am listing 5 people, who do I think we can lynch and who else can I throw in there" tell.
Except wait. He does replly to why Awaclus used to be scummy and is not anymore. He was just frustrated with Awaclus. It was a frustration read not a logic read and therefore invalid. But wait! Much later he is back to Awaclus as a real vote. Now I am really confused.
I think frustration vote is a fair way to describe my original vote on Awaclus. Then I went back to null on him.
And then as deadline approached and all lynches started looking better, Awaclus was a good option because he basically always is.
And so here we have him. Sitting on Awaclus. With a voting history of Awaclus, Hydrad, and RR. Best Votes Ever!
I really hadn't realised just how bad my vote history looks this game. I agree it looks bad. But I'm not going to edit my reads (which are genuine) to look townier. I'll do other things to look towny probably but not that.
Also I have a couple of time discussed gkrieg and been largely ignored. Never did vote for him, which was probably a mistake, but I feel that should be taken into account.
Well that's what I got. Obviously i'm thinking about claiming. But everyone has a pr, so not sure what the gain would be this close to deadline.