Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Teproc]

Could someone just use <b> on a vote or something so we can jump on the scumslip, please?

Also, semi-v/la for the weekend starting in ~30 minutes from this post.

I thought your L-1 thingie somehow convinced you that I was scum ?

ADK : what's your read on WW ?

[A Drowned Kernel]

Mmm I'm considering. Are you maintaining your position that he's scummy?

[chairs]

Could someone just use <b> on a vote or something so we can jump on the scumslip, please?

Also, semi-v/la for the weekend starting in ~30 minutes from this post.

I thought your L-1 thingie somehow convinced you that I was scum ?

ADK : what's your read on WW ?

I'm less convinced now than I was then. Actually kind of thinking vote: mail-mi now. I'm going to get my cutie mark in Mafia busting!

[chairs]

God, no matter how I look at it, pink is a bad font color for the forum with the theme I'm using.

In case anybody's having trouble reading it, that says "I'm going to get my cutie mark in Mafia busting!".

[Teproc]

Mmm I'm considering. Are you maintaining your position that he's scummy?

Yes. He's my preferred lynch for today, by a mile.

[A Drowned Kernel]

Suppose you couldn't lynch WW and were forced to pick someone else. Who would that be?

[Teproc]

Suppose you couldn't lynch WW and were forced to pick someone else. Who would that be?

My first instinct is skip, but I don't like lynching newbies on their first day, so I'd go with Awaclus. Completely under the radar, hasn't said anything of substance I can remember, and I do seem to recall that scum!Awaclus tends to be in the background, though I'd have to check.

[Seprix]

I'm not talking about two people arguing, I'm talking about mail-mi commenting on Teproc and WW and how there's a decent argument that that post is more likely to come from scum.

I think the argument I'm quoting has merit, which is now another reason I wish to vote for Mail-mi.

And why are you so certain that there's no information to be gained from Teproc and WW's argument?

I wasn't talking about the argument per se, rather the statement of the 'scum vs scum or town vs town' thing. I originally was going to clarify my earlier rambles on that, but I thought it would be understood in context. Eh. Rereading it now, it's pretty vague. Wish I clarified.

[Seprix]

God, no matter how I look at it, pink is a bad font color for the forum with the theme I'm using.

I am offended that you think I cannot read pink against white

[silverspawn]

I am offended that you think I cannot read pink against white

Tiny text is disallowed in the base maifa ruleset. I don't really mind personally, but since you agreed to it it's probably better if you don't use it.

[Awaclus]

Suppose you couldn't lynch WW and were forced to pick someone else. Who would that be?

My first instinct is skip, but I don't like lynching newbies on their first day, so I'd go with Awaclus. Completely under the radar, hasn't said anything of substance I can remember, and I do seem to recall that scum!Awaclus tends to be in the background, though I'd have to check.

Water is wet. Now I've said something of a substance you probably remember. 

I'm in the background because of midsummer and other ongoing games. I don't think it's typical for me to lurk a lot as either alignment, but I've done it more as town.

[Joseph2302]

God, no matter how I look at it, pink is a bad font color for the forum with the theme I'm using.

In case anybody's having trouble reading it, that says "I'm going to get my cutie mark in Mafia busting!".

Pink is the best, unfortunately all the pink colours on here don't show up well unless they're in bold, and you shouldn't bold stuff unless you're the mod. All the best mods use pink text though.

[Joseph2302]

Well I promised a serious vote. vote: UoS. I still don't like the rvs justification, I don't like this question. It doesn't seem genuine. They're not the kinds of things I remember from your other games (although they were quite a while ago, and were heavy in theory talk). I think this is worth some exploration.

It seems a bit odd I guess- could someone who's played with them before say if slightly odd is their usual meta or not?

I did know it was L-1.

I appreciate all the reactions.

vote: Teproc.  Sorry to worry you, WW, I just wanted to see what Teproc would do to an unannounced L-1

Town read on chairs.

Agree, also posting more than usual chairs is probably town!chairs. If chairs was scum, he could lurk as much as he wanted without attracting much suspicion. The post count isn't super-high, but enough to be very different to usual.

I don't think the mail-mi/Teproc scumteam line of reasoning makes much sense either (not only for the obvious reasons), but I doubt WW meant much by it. As a reminder : thinking about scumteams on day 1 is almost always counterproductive.

It's something Jimmmm pointed out once: a lot of the time, when scum has a  scumpartners in a big argument, etc., they make comments like "town v. town" or "same alignment" or something to that effect.

I buy this, actually. Teproc and mail-mi are probably either both town or both scum.

Hm I always forget that this could be the case, this happened in M62 (Hearthstone)- e and Teproc spent most of it accusing each other of being scum, and they were the scumteam. I guess I can see the argument, but how often is it actually same alignment, rather than different alignment?

Suppose you couldn't lynch WW and were forced to pick someone else. Who would that be?

My first instinct is skip, but I don't like lynching newbies on their first day, so I'd go with Awaclus. Completely under the radar, hasn't said anything of substance I can remember, and I do seem to recall that scum!Awaclus tends to be in the background, though I'd have to check.

Water is wet. Now I've said something of a substance you probably remember. 

I'm in the background because of midsummer and other ongoing games. I don't think it's typical for me to lurk a lot as either alignment, but I've done it more as town.

I guess it's something you've done as both, I seem to think you've been lurky D1 more often as town.

[silverspawn]

(...) and you shouldn't bold stuff unless you're the mod.

You can use bold text if you want, as long as it's different enough from this.

[pacovf]

I will give some thoughts tonight.

[Joseph2302]

(...) and you shouldn't bold stuff unless you're the mod.

You can use bold text if you want, as long as it's different enough from this.

Awesome, hot pink is the best colour.

[mail-mi]

Is all this voting for me because of

I have been lurking indeed; yesterday was busy. I should be on more today to answer any questions.

No that was not a hedge defense of skip, I just wanted to see what ADK's reasoning is.

I think Teproc and WW are of the same alignment. Whether that's town or scum, I don't know.

?

Well what else am I supposed to say? This argument sounds like a town v. town or a scum v. scum argument. That's my honest-to-goodness opinion, and if I'm scummy for it, well then fine.

As for right now, I like chairs' argument for teproc. vote: teproc

[UmbrageOfSnow]

skip / UoS scumteam, calling it now.

Eh, looks like town vs. town to me

I think you're possibly the type of person who may feel like you're not participating enough if you know you're really scum.

So to boil down your explanation: you wanted to see what I thought of you and seprix?

Not really.  I mean that's what I was really asking but I asked because I wanted to get a read on you and see what your thought process was like, and me and Seprix had had the most solid interaction at that point.

alright, I guess. Sounds weak, though

In all seriousness, Skip, this seems like you're coming from a place of assuming I'm scum first and looking for reasons, rather than reading my posts and evaluating.

I don't know what kind of brilliant grand plan you were expecting me to have behind my question but it reads like you were going to find me scummy for this regardless of what I said.  And your logic is that as scum I would want to be active (fair enough), but with no consideration to whether I'd ask the same question as town.  You're starting with your conclusion in mind.  If you're town, you should be careful of this.

What's your read on A Drowned Kernel?

[UmbrageOfSnow]

Hi Mail-mi.

What are your thoughts on WW in the WW-Teproc argument?

[mail-mi]

Hi Mail-mi.

What are your thoughts on WW in the WW-Teproc argument?

Nullish/scummy. I think Teproc comes out as more scummy, but I can definitely see WW being scum in this situation.

[skip wooznum]

skip / UoS scumteam, calling it now.

Eh, looks like town vs. town to me

I think you're possibly the type of person who may feel like you're not participating enough if you know you're really scum.

So to boil down your explanation: you wanted to see what I thought of you and seprix?

Not really.  I mean that's what I was really asking but I asked because I wanted to get a read on you and see what your thought process was like, and me and Seprix had had the most solid interaction at that point.

alright, I guess. Sounds weak, though

In all seriousness, Skip, this seems like you're coming from a place of assuming I'm scum first and looking for reasons, rather than reading my posts and evaluating.

I don't know what kind of brilliant grand plan you were expecting me to have behind my question but it reads like you were going to find me scummy for this regardless of what I said.  And your logic is that as scum I would want to be active (fair enough), but with no consideration to whether I'd ask the same question as town.  You're starting with your conclusion in mind.  If you're town, you should be careful of this.

What's your read on A Drowned Kernel?

I didn't come from a place of assuming you're scum. I came from a place of suspecting you're scum. I came from that place upon rereading your question to me. If you would have supplied a good explanation (which as you yourself say in the quoted post was something I could reasonably assume wouldn't happen) I would have been less suspecting (although I was assuming you wouldn't explain it well). I didn't particularly suspect you before I re-read that post of yours, if that's what you're insinuating.

[skip wooznum]

And im leaning town on adk.

[A Drowned Kernel]

We need more activity here. vote: pacovf, he hasn't received much scrutiny and has been doing a good job of blending in.

[Seprix]

Sorry, I'm planning a stream, and have been busy with college. I don't have much to say in all honesty at the moment. Mail-mi still seems like a good lynch.

[A Drowned Kernel]

Sorry, I'm planning a stream, and have been busy with college. I don't have much to say in all honesty at the moment. Mail-mi still seems like a good lynch.

Do you have any opinions on a pacovf lynch?