Topic: RMM26: Mistborn Mafia (Game Over!) (Read 197084 times)

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1325 on:** July 28, 2015, 01:40:00 pm »

I like vote: Ghacob

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1326 on:** July 28, 2015, 01:40:16 pm »

unvote

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1327 on:** July 28, 2015, 01:40:35 pm »

that would have been L-1

Witherweaver · « **Reply #1328 on:** July 28, 2015, 01:41:20 pm »

.. why are you afraid of L-1?

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1329 on:** July 28, 2015, 01:44:59 pm »

Quote from: Witherweaver on July 28, 2015, 01:41:20 pm

.. why are you afraid of L-1?

I just wanted to look at him one more time. He seems pretty scummy to me still.
The other reason is because mail-mi is on his wagon, and I still think he's scum too. And he wrote up a case on him.
vote: Ghacob

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1330 on:** July 28, 2015, 01:45:14 pm »

Still L-1

ashersky · « **Reply #1331 on:** July 28, 2015, 02:03:35 pm »

Vote Count 4.5:

Ghacob (5): hockeysemlan, mail-mi, Seprix, Hydrad, gkrieg13
Seprix (1): EFHW

Not Voting (5): witherweaver, IG, chairs, Ghacob, TA

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Day 4 ends on August 1 at 1:00 p.m.

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1332 on:** July 28, 2015, 02:06:53 pm »

Quote from: ashersky on July 28, 2015, 02:03:35 pm

Vote Count 4.5:

Ghacob (5): hockeysemlan, mail-mi, Seprix, Hydrad, gkrieg13
Seprix (1): EFHW

Not Voting (5): witherweaver, IG, chairs, Ghacob, TA

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

Day 4 ends on August 1 at 1:00 p.m.

That means no double vote this time

Witherweaver · « **Reply #1333 on:** July 28, 2015, 02:23:17 pm »

Oooh, interesting. We might be able to deduce who has it then.

Seprix · « **Reply #1334 on:** July 28, 2015, 02:30:14 pm »

I'm eyeing TA or IG right now.

Ichimaru Gin · « **Reply #1335 on:** July 28, 2015, 02:42:53 pm »

Why me? I know my activity has been pretty abysmal lately, but I'm here right now

chairs · « **Reply #1336 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:16:59 pm »

In case it's a "hidden double vote" where the vote is automatically laid when the first vote is made, maybe we can have one person on Ghacob's wagon get off for a moment, and then have each of those not already on his wagon put their vote on, then off in turn?

I'd be willing to go first if we go through with this plan.

Ichimaru Gin · « **Reply #1337 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:18:00 pm »

Quote from: chairs on July 28, 2015, 03:16:59 pm

In case it's a "hidden double vote" where the vote is automatically laid when the first vote is made, maybe we can have one person on Ghacob's wagon get off for a moment, and then have each of those not already on his wagon put their vote on, then off in turn?

I'd be willing to go first if we go through with this plan.

Sure. I'm willing to try that.

chairs · « **Reply #1338 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:18:19 pm »

(Note that I am suggesting we lynch Ghacob - just that we force the doublevoter to be outed if their role is compulsory by making them hammer with it)

hockeysemlan · « **Reply #1339 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:19:23 pm »

Quote from: chairs on July 28, 2015, 03:16:59 pm

In case it's a "hidden double vote" where the vote is automatically laid when the first vote is made, maybe we can have one person on Ghacob's wagon get off for a moment, and then have each of those not already on his wagon put their vote on, then off in turn?

I'd be willing to go first if we go through with this plan.

Hard to see why not

unvote

chairs · « **Reply #1340 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:20:31 pm »

...already found the flaw in my plan. If the vote is an optional day action independent of their visible vote, the doublevoter can actually frame it as a compulsory vote from any of the remaining off-wagon people simply be being sufficiently active to ensure their vote gets laid in before the desired person on the test list votes.

chairs · « **Reply #1341 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:21:12 pm »

That being said, I think we're early enough since l-1 happened that I can at least show it's not me.

vote: ghacob
unvote

Ichimaru Gin · « **Reply #1342 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:21:30 pm »

Ugh. Yeah that does leave us with know way of telling then, huh.

chairs · « **Reply #1343 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:22:18 pm »

Yeah, although my test there, if it results in a lynch, heavily implicates you, hockey, or myself, as the 3 active people in the thread.

chairs · « **Reply #1344 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:22:45 pm »

(YAY TIMING GAMES IN A FORUM-BASED GAME

)

hockeysemlan · « **Reply #1345 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:33:58 pm »

Quote from: chairs on July 28, 2015, 03:22:45 pm

(YAY TIMING GAMES IN A FORUM-BASED GAME )

Well, i lol'ed ^^

Can I vote back now or are we still testing? (And where IS Ghacob? Last time I saw him get pushed this far he went crazy- and with right since he was town.)

gkrieg13 · « **Reply #1346 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:35:09 pm »

I technically already did your test

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #1347 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:50:37 pm »

Quote from: hockeysemlan on July 28, 2015, 10:27:47 am

Quote from: Seprix on July 28, 2015, 10:19:12 am
Quote from: hockeysemlan on July 28, 2015, 10:15:36 am
Quote from: Seprix on July 28, 2015, 10:08:19 am
His reread is taking awhile.. Scum for delaying or town for playing more carelessly?

I know what I think on the matter...

Which is...?

Scum. Follow the votes.

Gah, I hate the fact that I'm so lousy at finding relevant quotes, but look up on how oblivious he was to e:s scummyness. Sure, e is a good scum, and the case on him wasn't the biggest one ever, but Ghacob and I were both in hearthstone where e crushed us. The resemblence to his play there made me sure enough to vote him and Ghacob should be able to recognize the same thing as I did..

That, plus the mislynches makes me pretty certain his caught and is delaying his response because of it. I might be wrong, both Ghacob and I are rather new so maybe I'm just far out here, but I think not.

I like this line of thinking. Honestly I feel like I've been trying to come up with a good case that fits perfectly and while it's possible (and I lot of the things I found scummy about e were actually scummy!) it's very easy to look for a perfect case rather than looking at what's obvious. This is definitely a scum narrative for ghacob based on his votes and his defense of e.

Twistedarcher · « **Reply #1348 on:** July 28, 2015, 03:53:37 pm »

Chairs narrative doesn't make sense. He says he's worried about scum roleblocking him so that there's no trail he can prove himself on later, but doctors don't really leave a trail. Also don't like that he's assuming his doctoring isn't working when he really couldn't know it isn't unless he attempted to doctor a nk. For all he would know we're playing multiball/sk (I think more unlikely than not) and chairs has blocked kills yet he assumed this wasn't the case.

EFHW · « **Reply #1349 on:** July 28, 2015, 04:59:06 pm »

Quote from: Twistedarcher on July 28, 2015, 03:53:37 pm

Chairs narrative doesn't make sense. He says he's worried about scum roleblocking him so that there's no trail he can prove himself on later, but doctors don't really leave a trail. Also don't like that he's assuming his doctoring isn't working when he really couldn't know it isn't unless he attempted to doctor a nk. For all he would know we're playing multiball/sk (I think more unlikely than not) and chairs has blocked kills yet he assumed this wasn't the case.

I've been wondering about this too - that's why I asked who his targets had been.

Dominion Strategy Forum

News:

Author Topic: RMM26: Mistborn Mafia (Game Over!) (Read 197084 times)