So who do you want to lynch?
Seprix/LA!
That's funny because Seprix is the person I find most suspicious right now.
vote: Seprix (for now)
For the same reason Hydrad said:
LA has felt pretty scummy to me since day 1 but I gave him a bye since hes new. Seprix Just feels like he switches votes whenever a wagon hes on starts stalling and moves to the next likely target. It feels like hes just looking for a lynch and doesn't care who it is.
People are saying I seem scummy, but I don't remember anyone presenting a case or reason for it. Is it because, like Seprix, I don't have much go on against anyone?
Now I kinda feel hypocritical for voting Seprix. I'm about to hammer Pit, but I think I want another day to consider options.
Faust seemed towny most of the game until he started pushing no lynch. I don't think Swamp Hag would keep mafia from killing, and agree with Grey that it's really unlikely that we wouldn't hit mafia with at least one of those lynches. Town kills are always better than mafia kills. Let's use our town kills.
Giving up a lynch... Loses us a lynch. With no benefit.
hmmm, I didn't think pit seemed particularly suspicious until this post:
Completely forgot about this game, sorry. I agree with faust, a single lynch actualy seems better than the double lynch.
I mean swamp hag is okay and all, but you'll never figure out who is hated at 4:3
Why not? Even if it takes 24h per player, that's still enough time. + We can surely find a time where 4 (or more) of us have 15 minutes time to coordinate 7 votes each...
Besides my obvious dislike for pushing no-lynch, I really don't like the idea of trying to get each person to L-1 to kill the hated scum when it would be so easy for scum to hammer whoever. Then again... if scum hammers a townsperson, then we'll know he's scum. Is that such a bad thing?