I'm not sure what's unclear. Let me try this: why is e scummy?
1. He basically had one sentence to say about Hydrad. Period. That's scummy.
2. He's been lurking and hasn't gotten much suspicion until now. His overall play just doesn't feel like town!e to me.
3. He made a poor case on me and has tunneled me since then while simultaneously chastising me and telling me changing your mind is the towniest thing ever. And don't tell me that's OMGUS. Great cases have been made on me in the past, and I have acknowledged them as such. I've had enough of scum bullying me into feeling like scummy town, when I know they're in the wrong.
4. He's defended you heavily all day, yet has managed to give virtually nothing of substance except how "mysterious" your role is or something.
5. He thinks it's a good idea to let Joseph poison 2 people tonight?! Ash made a good post about how that's far and above more likely to screw us over--especially considering who Joseph claimed to have targeted N1.
6. He made this post.
No, no, no. I hate OMGUS. It is silly. I wanted a good case that I could respond to and demonstrably prove that I am town. Which I don't get either. Because you didn't create a case, you created a summary. Which is really easy to do. As scum
There are so many things wrong with this post, I don't even know where to begin. I'll just continue the list.
7. He says he hates OMGUS and wanted a "good case" and then says he doesn't get that "either". What is "either" referring to here? It is obviously scum!e dissapointed that I didn't make some terrible case on him that he could exploit to his benefit.
8. I call him out for his obviously dishonest use of "good case". What player of any alignment ever wants a good case on them? No one. And I ask him explicitly
How would me making a good case help you prove you are town? A good case would prove you are scum. (though of course, nothing can really be "proved" per se).
And he just dodges the question with another post about what he "actually" meant. A word that he seems to favor in responding to me. It is glaringly obvious that he wanted me to post something that would make me look bad and that he could exploit to continue tunneling me--which of course he does anyway with some bullshit about summaries being scummy. How would you define a case?
I agree with ss that a case is basically a subset of a summary with a person's scummiest posts--and some thoughts about those posts. A summary is actually harder since you have to say something about every single important post--it also gives a clearer picture and is more useful overall. I never used the word case; e's the one that used that word. I planned to do a reread all along. Frankly the whole case/summary (technically reread) thing is annoying and pointless. e's fixation on it is so strange it's comical.
I don't really expect WW to be convinced by this--because I think he's e's partner, but I expect it to be useful to others. And watch, now that I've made something akin to a case, e will just continue chanting how scummy I am.