Dominion Strategy Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - wharf_rat

Filter to certain boards:

Pages: [1]
1
Dominion League / Re: Season 35 - Newsletter: Feedback
« on: July 21, 2019, 11:06:02 pm »
What follows is the agenda for the rules portion of the Season 35 moderators meeting, along with all votes taken during this portion.
  • Changes to the rules document itself
    • Living document/Google doc
      • Make Rules & Regulations change log public
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • "Tighten up" and make more precise
      • Will handle on a case-by-case basis.
    • Amendment process
      • Motion to add Amendment section postulating that moderators may change the rules by a majority vote of all League moderators for a given season
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Motion to add a comment to above section that exceptions to the rules can be changed mid-season (by a majority vote) if and only if all directly affected players agree to such a change.
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
  • Community relations
    • Other ways to collect feedback beyond Returning form
      • Agree to allow players to submit feedback that we will look at via newsletter forum post replies
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • League Fan role question in Returning form
      • Add "Would you like the League Fan role?" to the returning form for non-returners
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Town Hall meetings
      • Town Hall meetings as an option for challenges on which we need creativity
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Dedicated feedback Discord channel
      • No dedicated feedback channel for now, reassess next season
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Dedicated moderator liaison
      • No liaison for now. Revisit if there is substantial disagreement between players and moderators
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
  • Changes to League structure
    • New tiebreakers
      • Add the third tiebreaker before the "final tiebreaker"
        • Result: NO (4 dissenting)
      • "Add the third tiebreaker?" as a question for the returning form?
        • Result: YES (2 dissenting)
      • What should the final tiebreaker be? (approval votes)
        • 2-3 game playoff (9)
        • 4-5 game playoff (4)
        • 1 game playoff (3)
        • Coin flip (2)
        • Coin flip, but flip ahead (and announce) (2)
        • 6-7 game playoff (0)
      • Allow concessions in tiebreaker match
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • If one player is non-responsive within a reasonable time (48 hours in worst case, likely 7 days), give the win to their opponent
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Results of previous two votes go in the FAQ (as opposed to the rules).
        • Result: NO (2 dissenting)
      • If both players are responsive but mutually unable to schedule, they may mutually agree for a coin flip instead
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • If both players are non-responsive, we flip a coin
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • If both players are responsive, but one is completely unavailable and does not wish to concede (votes)
        • Give the win to the available player ( 8 )
        • We flip a coin (1)
      • Add the above poll to the returning form?
        • Result: NO (unanimous)
      • If both players are responsive and available at times but not available at the same time, we flip a coin
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Expand A (or other divisions)
      • Using SamE’s informal discord poll (“Fully-fleshed-out options that have been proposed so far to cover the case of more players returning to a tier than there are spots at that tier and above,” Monday, July 15, 16:13 UTC), moderators voted among themselves between the two most popular options: “1) Expand to however many seven-player divisions are necessary with two demotions. Divisions would stay at 7 until there are fewer returners than leavers,” and “0) Of course, there is also the status quo option of just encouraging these players to return at a lower level.”
        • Result: Option 0 (unanimous)
      • Add the same poll between options 0 and 1 to the returning form?
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Should we hold a Town Hall on division expansion?
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Way for 2nd place to promote
      • Need to see a complete proposal to assess properly.
    • Seeding
      • Proposal: Ask in the returning form about what aspects of the general philosophy of seeding people find relevant
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Poll longer season breaks in the returning form?
        • Result: NO (1 dissenting)
    • Longer/shorter break between seasons
      • Infeasible on the moderator end to shorten it. Will discuss lengths of breaks at a future Town Hall.
  • Changes to matches and games
    • Scheduling issues
      • Encourage people to friend their League opponents on the client in Discord Post 2
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Ban list
      • When the banlist feature comes out, respect banned cards in League matches by default
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Banlist default on the returning form
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Default for current season is to have only Possession banned, but of course players can mutually agree to respect ban lists.
        • Result: YES (1 dissenting)
      • Banlists are not allowed to be changed within a match (except by mutual agreement)
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Once the banlist feature is live, have a Town Hall about it.
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Undo rules
      • Undo rule details should be in the official document
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Keep content of our undo policy
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
      • Reword undo policy to emphasize the default and pre-match discussions
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
  • Changes to moderator technologies
    • Week 2 stats and spreadsheets meeting
      • Will try it out this season.
    • Bots know about scheduled matches (for internal tracking)
      • Will see how difficult this is to implement.
    • Week 7 daily bot messages
      • No change to messaging pattern. All late match communication handled directly by the moderator, not the bot.
  • Changes to moderator responsibilities
    • Increase transparency
      • Several plans already in the works, see later votes.
    • Separation of duties
      • Unclear, will be handled on a case-by-case basis.
    • Conflicts of interest
      • Already minimized. Unclear how they could be further reduced.
    • Selection of new moderators
      • Add a line to the Moderation section that new moderators are chosen by a vote of the previous season's moderator team
        • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Selection of new administrative moderator
      • Future arrangements might be different from the current one given moderator availability/skills.
  • Retention
    • Will discuss at a future Town Hall.
  • Miscellaneous
    • Make #announcements read- and react-only for non-moderators
      • Result: NO (1 dissenting)
    • Include the championship match in the rules
      • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Post list of moderators and their divisions somewhere - #announcements proposed
      • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Should there be a rules committee?
      • Result: NO (unanimous)
    • Adding the agenda + votes of the moderator meeting to the end of the newsletter (as a reply)
      • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Require the agenda and votes to be recorded in every season going forward (put this in the rules)
      • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Don't post anything additional about player who were dropped outside their division channel
      • Result: YES (unanimous)
    • Table discussion of "spreading out" new players to next season
      • Result: YES (unanimous)

2
Commentary by Sharur, aku chi, and ceviri.


3
Tournaments and Events / Re: Renaissance: The Tournament
« on: September 23, 2018, 01:02:55 am »
In

4
Just chiming in to note one interesting moment I had with Guardian and no attacks. I had the $2/$7 opening with Cursed Gold, and could use a Guardian buy Turn 1 to Donate Turn 2 and pay off all debt right away, leaving 5 coppers, allowing me to Windfall Turn 3.

5
Dominion League / Re: Season 26 - Signups
« on: February 04, 2018, 12:49:21 pm »
Count me in for my first season

wharf_rat

America/Chicago

6
Tournaments and Events / Re: Noctournament (Dualset)
« on: December 10, 2017, 04:56:16 pm »
jakey 4 - 3 wharf_rat

9522072 Empires
9522588 Base
9523329 Alch/Promos
9523927 Adventures
9524319 Seaside
9524917 Prosperity
9525394 Nocturne

7
Tournaments and Events / Re: Noctournament (Dualset)
« on: December 02, 2017, 02:27:46 pm »
wharf_rat 1 - 5 Awaclus

9267042 (Seaside)
9267622 (Empires)
9267822 (Intrigue)
9268114 (Adventures)
9268484 (Prosperity)
9268758 (Hinterlands)

8
Tournaments and Events / Re: Noctournament (Dualset)
« on: November 17, 2017, 10:56:19 am »
In

Pages: [1]

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 19 queries.